Re: Google Summer of Code 2015

2015-03-06 Thread Georgy Frolov
Hello, I too would like to do a lilypond-related GSoC project. I'm doing the final year of my MSc degree in mathematical physics, sing in a choir and occasionally use lilypond to typeset some choral scores; not yet familiar with its internals though. I've been working much with numerical codes in

Docs: Issue 4181: Expose \stemUp and \stemDown predefs less (issue 214870044 by tdanielsmu...@googlemail.com)

2015-03-06 Thread tdanielsmusic
Reviewers: , Message: This patch eliminates virtually all mention of the \stemUp and \stemDown predefs from the LM. Most of the uses of these predefs in the NR are sensible, so I have left untouched the ones in ancient, editorial, percussion and staff. Apart from the bald mention in staff, thes

New German PO file for 'lilypond' (version 2.19.16)

2015-03-06 Thread Translation Project Robot
Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. A revised PO file for textual domain 'lilypond' has been submitted by the German team of translators. The file is available at: http://translationproject.org/latest/lilypond/de.po (We can arrange things so that

Re: Google Summer of Code 2015

2015-03-06 Thread david156
Thanks for all the info and support! I am happy there is interest in the program. In response to Urs' first reply, it seems as though lily <-> xml is the more GSoC-oriented project. I take it that the tie formatting project is too large? Does alternative involve implementing heuristics that Janek W

Re: lilypond documentation build issue (both 2.18.2 and 2.19.16)

2015-03-06 Thread James Lowe
On 06/03/15 14:33, Petr Gajdos wrote: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 03:09:36PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: >>> fretted-strings.texi2pdf.log reads: > >> So the problem is not one with fretted-strings.texi but rather >> with what causes your build procedure to run texi2pdf on it in >> the first place. >

Re: lilypond documentation build issue (both 2.18.2 and 2.19.16)

2015-03-06 Thread Petr Gajdos
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 03:09:36PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > > fretted-strings.texi2pdf.log reads: > So the problem is not one with fretted-strings.texi but rather with what > causes your build procedure to run texi2pdf on it in the first place. Thanks for the pointer, will try to look in th

Re: lilypond documentation build issue (both 2.18.2 and 2.19.16)

2015-03-06 Thread David Kastrup
Petr Gajdos writes: > Hello, > > please help me with debugging following build failure: > > https://build.opensuse.org/build/multimedia:apps/openSUSE_Factory/x86_64/lilypond-doc/_log > > fretted-strings.texi2pdf.log reads: > > --- >> > This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.5-1.

lilypond documentation build issue (both 2.18.2 and 2.19.16)

2015-03-06 Thread Petr Gajdos
Hello, please help me with debugging following build failure: https://build.opensuse.org/build/multimedia:apps/openSUSE_Factory/x86_64/lilypond-doc/_log fretted-strings.texi2pdf.log reads: --- > This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.5-1.40.14 (TeX Live 2013/TeX Live for SUSE

Re: Remove redundant (and) in ly/init.ly (issue 209320043 by lilyli...@googlemail.com)

2015-03-06 Thread dak
This has been added as commit 4e4a3b4106cb4982f0c06ca26bad2f2641c0382e Author: Han-Wen Nienhuys Date: Tue Mar 29 14:15:39 2005 + *** empty log message *** and is clearly an intentional addition for the sake of making it easy to disable this functionality. I don't see much of a point

Re: Remove redundant (and) in ly/init.ly (issue 209320043 by lilyli...@googlemail.com)

2015-03-06 Thread Urs Liska
OK, thanks for the explanation. But after all these lines one more with a conclusion wouldn't have hurt, isn't is? Did you want to say the patch should be discarded? Am 06.03.2015 11:55, schrieb d...@gnu.org: On 2015/03/06 10:45:14, uliska wrote: See discussion here: http://lists.gnu.org/arch

Re: Remove redundant (and) in ly/init.ly (issue 209320043 by lilyli...@googlemail.com)

2015-03-06 Thread dak
On 2015/03/06 10:45:14, uliska wrote: See discussion here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-03/msg00180.html The point of this construct is that you can just edit the #t to be #f if you want to disable the functionality. The discussion apparently only centers around whether

Remove redundant (and) in ly/init.ly (issue 209320043 by lilyli...@googlemail.com)

2015-03-06 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Message: See discussion here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-03/msg00180.html Description: Remove redundant (and) in ly/init.ly This (and) construct is redundant because the first expression is explicitly #t. Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.c

PATCHES: Countdown for March 9th 2015

2015-03-06 Thread James Lowe
Hello, Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on March 9th. You can always view the most current countdown list here: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?q=Patch%3Apush%2Ccountdown%2Creview%2Cnew%2Cwaiting&colspec=Patch%20Owner%20ID%20Summary&sort=patch __

PATCHES: Countdown for March 3rd 2015

2015-03-06 Thread James Lowe
Hello, Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on March 9th. You can always view the most current countdown list here: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?q=Patch%3Apush%2Ccountdown%2Creview%2Cnew%2Cwaiting&colspec=Patch%20Owner%20ID%20Summary&sort=patch __

Re: Patch for issue 3882: stencils with stroke-thickness set to zero (issue 201520044 by luk.piet...@gmail.com)

2015-03-06 Thread pkx166h
Patch counted down - please push https://codereview.appspot.com/201520044/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel