OK, thanks for the explanation.
But after all these lines one more with a conclusion wouldn't have hurt,
isn't is?
Did you want to say the patch should be discarded?
Am 06.03.2015 11:55, schrieb d...@gnu.org:
On 2015/03/06 10:45:14, uliska wrote:
See discussion here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-03/msg00180.html
The point of this construct is that you can just edit the #t to be #f if
you want to disable the functionality. The discussion apparently only
centers around whether this serves a non-trivial programmatic purpose.
It is similar to occurences of
#if 0
...
...
#endif
in C code. Of course, you can trivially replace this with something
simpler manually without changing the net effect. That's not the point.
The point is that it's easy to change to the opposite behavior, and
that it is something that is half-advertised as something to play with.
https://codereview.appspot.com/209320043/
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
--
Urs Liska
u...@openlilylib.org
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
