Re: contributing instructions are misleading!

2013-12-31 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 06:35:36PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote: > 2013/12/12 Graham Percival : > > Sorry, this awoke Grumpy Graham. > > I should have expected that. Yes, you should have. :P Happy new year, BTW. > Anyway, there are two parts to this cg cleanup: > 1) removing obsolete info > 2)

Re: CG: basic cleanup (issue 46120044)

2013-12-31 Thread graham
LGTM https://codereview.appspot.com/46120044/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi File Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi (left): https://codereview.appspot.com/46120044/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi#oldcode729 Documentation/contributor/source-code.it

CG: basic cleanup (issue 46120044)

2013-12-31 Thread k-ohara5a5a
looks fine https://codereview.appspot.com/46120044/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi File Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi (left): https://codereview.appspot.com/46120044/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi#oldcode729 Documentation/contributor/source-c

Swap 'polite' and 'l2r' variable definitions (issue 42000044)

2013-12-31 Thread k-ohara5a5a
The old variable definitions followed the corresponding words in the options. I see the bug in the old code, so left-to-right did not behave symmetrically to right-to-left. If the actual behavior fits the chosen options with your change, then good enough. https://codereview.appspot.com/424

Re: Guile 2 support

2013-12-31 Thread karl
David Kastrup: > Sven Axelsson writes: ... > > I know that there have been plans of bumping to Guile 2 for a long > > time now. Is this something that is planned for the next release? > > Oh, definitely. It's not like it wasn't planned for 2.16 and 2.14. But > somebody has to do the heavy lifti

Re: Guile 2 support

2013-12-31 Thread Sven Axelsson
On 1 January 2014 00:30, David Kastrup wrote: > Sven Axelsson writes: > > > Fantastic work everyone with getting version 2.18 out of the door. > > > > When I saw the release notice, I immediately wanted to update the > Homebrew > > formula (Homebrew is a package manager for Mac OS X). However, I

Re: Guile 2 support

2013-12-31 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 12/31/13 4:30 PM, "David Kastrup" wrote: >Sven Axelsson writes: > >> Fantastic work everyone with getting version 2.18 out of the door. >> >> When I saw the release notice, I immediately wanted to update the >>Homebrew >> formula (Homebrew is a package manager for Mac OS X). However, I was >>

Re: Guile 2 support

2013-12-31 Thread David Kastrup
Sven Axelsson writes: > Fantastic work everyone with getting version 2.18 out of the door. > > When I saw the release notice, I immediately wanted to update the Homebrew > formula (Homebrew is a package manager for Mac OS X). However, I was told > by the maintainers that an update would not be ac

Guile 2 support

2013-12-31 Thread Sven Axelsson
Fantastic work everyone with getting version 2.18 out of the door. When I saw the release notice, I immediately wanted to update the Homebrew formula (Homebrew is a package manager for Mac OS X). However, I was told by the maintainers that an update would not be accepted, unless Lilypond would com

Re: Cleanup of ugly MI and SOL shaped noteheads (issue 45160043)

2013-12-31 Thread Carl Peterson
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:29 PM, wrote: > On 2013/12/24 23:22:00, Carl P. wrote: > >> This may well need to happen. As I said, I've tried a few times over > > the >> >> last 8 or 9 months to inquire about the mi head particulary, with no >> response. > > > If you're the only person on the lists

Re: contributing instructions are misleading!

2013-12-31 Thread Janek Warchoł
Hi, 2013/12/12 Graham Percival : > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 01:48:54PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote: >> PS ccing to Graham because he might be interested to know that >> Someone(TM) is doing Something(TM) to help new contributors! > > Sorry, this awoke Grumpy Graham. I should have expected that. Qui

Re: Cleanup of ugly MI and SOL shaped noteheads (issue 45160043)

2013-12-31 Thread Carl . D . Sorensen
On 2013/12/24 23:22:00, Carl P. wrote: This may well need to happen. As I said, I've tried a few times over the last 8 or 9 months to inquire about the mi head particulary, with no response. If you're the only person on the lists who cares, then you should be able to have it the way you want

Re: LilyPond 2.18.0 released

2013-12-31 Thread Richard Shann
... and to prove that 2.18 has arrived, here is perhaps the first published score typeset with it: http://imslp.org/wiki/8_Solos,_Op.1_%28Stanley,_John%29#IMSLP309222 I have had to update Denemo to use the new \bar syntax, but otherwise everything went smoothly. Congratulations on the new release

Doc: NR 2.4.1 - add Hammer/Pull snippets (issue 46730043)

2013-12-31 Thread tdanielsmusic
LGTM, apart from a couple of nits https://codereview.appspot.com/46730043/diff/1/Documentation/snippets/new/hammer-on-and-pull-off-using-chords.ly File Documentation/snippets/new/hammer-on-and-pull-off-using-chords.ly (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/46730043/diff/1/Documentation/snippet

Re: LilyPond 2.18.0 released

2013-12-31 Thread Janek Warchoł
Hi Valentin, 2013/12/31 Valentin Villenave : > > Special thanks to David for his proficiency and availability, and > Janek for his seemingly endless enthusiasm! You're welcome! > There again, people like > you two are (in your own very different ways) a model to me and I wish > I had your energy

Re: LilyPond 2.18.0 released

2013-12-31 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote: > Thanks and congratulations to everyone! Likewise: congratulations on a job well done! I’ve been closely following the latest versions, and I must say working with 2.18 does offer some great improvements over the previous stable releases. I