Hi, 2013/12/12 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 01:48:54PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote: >> PS ccing to Graham because he might be interested to know that >> Someone(TM) is doing Something(TM) to help new contributors! > > Sorry, this awoke Grumpy Graham.
I should have expected that. Quite frankly, when i read your reply 3 weeks ago, i got irritated, but fortunately i didn't have time to answer ;-) and now - after calming down - i have to admit that you make some good points. My proposal was not good enough (and i certainly failed to express myself clearly, because it seems you had slightly misunderstood me). Anyway, there are two parts to this cg cleanup: 1) removing obsolete info 2) reorganizing things. 1) is a no-brainer, and i'll do it now (and push after patchy confirms it isn't broken). 2) will have to wait till i have more time (summer?). >> After a good deal of thinking, here's how i think CG should be >> structured. > > More thinking and discussion than we had the previous 4 times we > reorganized the CG? Quite frankly, i'm pretty sure that i gave CG more thought than all of us combined since Waltrop 2012 ;-) Also, times change and stuff like CG gets out of date - even if it was ok after previous reorganization, it doesn't mean that a new reorganization isn't warranted, don't you think? Anyway, guess what? +1 for Graham! :-) cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
