PATCH: Countdown to 20120923

2012-09-20 Thread Colin Campbell
For 20:00 MDT Sunday September 23 Critical: Issue 2831 : Crash with slurs and flags and duration-override - R 6500130 Documentation: Issue 2807

Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint

2012-09-20 Thread Thomas Morley
Sorry, forgot to complete the mail adresses. 2012/9/20 David Kastrup : > Marc Hohl writes: [...] > But we don't have users involved either. And those are actually the > ones for which such additions are made. Involving them instead in a > planning stage largely disconnected from actual develo

Re: GOP2-5 - GLISS discussions

2012-09-20 Thread Ian Hulin
On 14/09/12 07:13, Graham Percival wrote: > http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_6.html > > ** Summary > > We’ve gone over the same arguments a number of times, so let’s try > to resolve them. Fluff will go on a new mailing lilypond-quacks > mailing list. Serious proposals, if any, will go to > li

Re: Doc: Improve documentation of \glissando. (issue 6529043)

2012-09-20 Thread thomasmorley65
On 2012/09/20 18:08:15, Graham Percival wrote: We normally do not include \override in most sections of the Notation manual. Instead, we ask users to submit LSR snippets showing the \override, then we include those snippets in the docs. This allows us to improve the documentation with mini

Re: Doc: Improve documentation of \glissando. (issue 6529043)

2012-09-20 Thread lemzwerg
Reviewers: Graham Percival, Message: I agree with your argumentation. However, I don't have time to fix the patch. Maybe a good soul from the documentation team can improve this. Description: Doc: Improve documentation of \glissando. Based on work from Tiresia GIUNO . Please review this at h

Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2717 in lilypond: Patch: Implement \hidden/\hide as shorthands for \tweak/\override #'stencil = ##f

2012-09-20 Thread David Kastrup
Jean-Charles Malahieude writes: > Le 20/09/2012 19:15, Marc Hohl disait : >> Am 20.09.2012 18:17, schrieb lilyp...@googlecode.com: >>> [...] >>> >>> Oh. \omit is actually even better, isn't it? >> Yes, I like it! >>> >>> I'll likely change that, short of protests. Still, something more >>> conv

Re: how do i feel about GLISS discussions

2012-09-20 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:11:22AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote: > i was going to write that i'm tired by the arguments that seem to > plague our GLISS discussions, and that i need a break. That's the correct thing to do. The current flamefest is going nowhere. Or rather, it's going backwards: by

Re: Doc: Improve documentation of \glissando. (issue 6529043)

2012-09-20 Thread Marc Hohl
Am 20.09.2012 20:08, schrieb gra...@percival-music.ca: We normally do not include \override in most sections of the Notation manual. Instead, we ask users to submit LSR snippets showing the \override, then we include those snippets in the docs. This allows us to improve the documentation with m

Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint

2012-09-20 Thread Marc Hohl
[sorry, forgot to hit "Reply to all"] Am 20.09.2012 19:02, schrieb David Kastrup: Marc Hohl writes: [...] The problem is not people not interested in this kind of discussions/proposals. The problem is people who stop being interested in an oh so important problem the moment one tries offerin

Doc: Improve documentation of \glissando. (issue 6529043)

2012-09-20 Thread graham
We normally do not include \override in most sections of the Notation manual. Instead, we ask users to submit LSR snippets showing the \override, then we include those snippets in the docs. This allows us to improve the documentation with minimal effort on the part of developers. If there's a s

Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2717 in lilypond: Patch: Implement \hidden/\hide as shorthands for \tweak/\override #'stencil = ##f

2012-09-20 Thread Jean-Charles Malahieude
Le 20/09/2012 19:15, Marc Hohl disait : Am 20.09.2012 18:17, schrieb lilyp...@googlecode.com: [...] Oh. \omit is actually even better, isn't it? Yes, I like it! I'll likely change that, short of protests. Still, something more convincing for \single would be nice. Yes, but I still have no

Doc: extend explanation of relative-includes (2558) (issue 6490120)

2012-09-20 Thread graham
LGTM http://codereview.appspot.com/6490120/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: [patch] Doc: fix small inaccuracy

2012-09-20 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 07:35:41PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote: > I don't remember whether simple patches like this can obtain LGTM > directly through the list or they need a rietveld push in any case. Sure, that's simple enough. LGTM, please push directly. - Graham

[patch] Doc: fix small inaccuracy

2012-09-20 Thread Francisco Vila
Hello, this patch changes "variables"-->"commands" when talking about \germanChords, \semiGermanChords etc in NR 2.7.2. I don't remember whether simple patches like this can obtain LGTM directly through the list or they need a rietveld push in any case. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.pacon

Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2717 in lilypond: Patch: Implement \hidden/\hide as shorthands for \tweak/\override #'stencil = ##f

2012-09-20 Thread David Kastrup
Werner LEMBERG writes: >> Still, something more convincing for \single would be nice. > > \immediate? How is \once not immediate? Or actually any override? At least I am not convinced. Another thought I had was to punt and not create a separate command, but just let \tweak itself take an over

Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2717 in lilypond: Patch: Implement \hidden/\hide as shorthands for \tweak/\override #'stencil = ##f

2012-09-20 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Still, something more convincing for \single would be nice. \immediate? Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2717 in lilypond: Patch: Implement \hidden/\hide as shorthands for \tweak/\override #'stencil = ##f

2012-09-20 Thread Marc Hohl
Am 20.09.2012 18:17, schrieb lilyp...@googlecode.com: [...] Oh. \omit is actually even better, isn't it? Yes, I like it! I'll likely change that, short of protests. Still, something more convincing for \single would be nice. Yes, but I still have no clue ... _

Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint

2012-09-20 Thread David Kastrup
Marc Hohl writes: > Am 20.09.2012 11:56, schrieb David Kastrup: >> David Kastrup writes: >> >>> Within your own scores, be consistent in your choices. How this >>> consistency looks, does not matter. Within LilyPond, there is a large >>> consistency which elements are uppercase, and which lowe

Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint

2012-09-20 Thread Marc Hohl
Am 20.09.2012 11:56, schrieb David Kastrup: David Kastrup writes: Within your own scores, be consistent in your choices. How this consistency looks, does not matter. Within LilyPond, there is a large consistency which elements are uppercase, and which lowercase. The one thing that actually

Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint

2012-09-20 Thread David Kastrup
David Kastrup writes: > Within your own scores, be consistent in your choices. How this > consistency looks, does not matter. Within LilyPond, there is a large > consistency which elements are uppercase, and which lowercase. The one > thing that actually gets annoying is CamelCase. However, a

how do i feel about GLISS discussions

2012-09-20 Thread Janek Warchoł
Hi Team, i was going to write that i'm tired by the arguments that seem to plague our GLISS discussions, and that i need a break. But then i realized that i love Lilypond too much, and that i care both about her development and her developers, so i'll continue participating in the discussions :)