Jean-Charles Malahieude <lily...@orange.fr> writes: > Le 20/09/2012 19:15, Marc Hohl disait : >> Am 20.09.2012 18:17, schrieb lilyp...@googlecode.com: >>> [...] >>> >>> Oh. \omit is actually even better, isn't it? >> Yes, I like it! >>> >>> I'll likely change that, short of protests. Still, something more >>> convincing for \single would be nice. >> Yes, but I still have no clue ... >> > > Why not "\mask", since the space taken by the object is still preserved?
Uh no, it isn't. That's "\hide", working through the "transparent" property. "\omit" does not preserve the space since it removes the "stencil". Yes, the issue title needs to be adapted. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
