Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes: >> Still, something more convincing for \single would be nice. > > \immediate?
How is \once not immediate? Or actually any override? At least I am not convinced. Another thought I had was to punt and not create a separate command, but just let \tweak itself take an override instead of a specification, like \tweak \hideNotes c but I am not particularly enthused about that. Currently the signature of \tweak is something like (parser location name property value music) ((string?) symbol? scheme? ly:music?) and this change would not really be all that compatible. I think I figured some rather contrived combination of options to hand-simulate that kind of behavior, but I am no longer sure. A separate word seems saner. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel