On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:25:40 -0700, Mike Solomon wrote:
On Aug 19, 2011, at 5:01 AM, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
A swing and a miss, I'm afraid.
See input/regression/pedal-bracket for what the original alignment goals
were. (You could expand that reg-test to cover issue 723)
I think the cor
It's been a few weeks since we had the last mentors
"organization".
I must admit that I haven't been a particularly good mentor.
Notably, I failed #5 "keep track of patches from your contributor"
and #7 "contact your contributor at least once a week".
Other mentors, how have you done? You don't n
I have grave doubts about adding a second search box.
1) it makes the top bar uncomfortably squashed in my default web browser
window
2) it requires users to choose which type of search they want to do.
#1 isn't about me forcing my desktop browser preferences on anybody, but
rather I'm making th
LGTM, please push.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4938044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/4888046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 04:05:14PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> I'm looking at documenting this, and I think it needs to go in 2
> places: the section on compiling the docs: 4.6.2 Generating
> documentation
Yes, definitely!
> and the section in 2.3 Compiling with lilydev on
> making docs.
Please
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 03:19:50PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Graham Percival"
>
> >In the short-term, I think it would be extremely helpful if you
> >could create the $HOME/lilypond/media stuff, then create the
> >website from a blank build tree -- convince yo
LGTM. Please push without waiting for a countdown.
(but maybe remove the parentheses first)
http://codereview.appspot.com/4921050/diff/2001/python/book_texinfo.py
File python/book_texinfo.py (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4921050/diff/2001/python/book_texinfo.py#newcode250
python/book_
depending on how smart git is, it might be good to rebase and upload a
new draft of this patch after
http://codereview.appspot.com/4888046/
is pushed (currently on a 48-hour countdown)
http://codereview.appspot.com/4940043/diff/1/python/book_snippets.py
File python/book_snippets.py (right):
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 07:56:10PM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
>Of the 14 patches for review, 6 are less than 48 hours old and too young
>to be on this list,
What? There's no point waiting. If something is marked
patch-review, then (space permitting) it should go on the next
countdown.
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 05:01:04PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> Currently, version numbers are hard-coded into one of the scripts
> that is run by make website. It'd be fairly trivial to parse the
> VERSION file in the top-level source directory to create this
> correctly, on the fly. Is this the
On Aug 25, 2011, at 9:08 PM, Mike Solomon wrote:
> On Aug 25, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Mike Solomon wrote:
>>
>>> I have verified via pacifier prints that the pure heights of the flag are
>>> being taken from the stencil function and are g
On Aug 25, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Mike Solomon wrote:
>
>> I have verified via pacifier prints that the pure heights of the flag are
>> being taken from the stencil function and are going into the spacing engine
>> in separation-item.cc. H
Currently, version numbers are hard-coded into one of the scripts that is
run by make website. It'd be fairly trivial to parse the VERSION file in
the top-level source directory to create this correctly, on the fly. Is
this the right approach/file to use, or is there an alternative "approved"
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Mike Solomon wrote:
> On Aug 23, 2011, at 6:55 AM, joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/4860042/diff/1/lily/bezier.cc
>> File lily/bezier.cc (right):
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/4860042/diff/1/lily/bezier.cc#newcode239
>> lily/b
- Original Message -
From: "Federico Bruni"
italian:
"Search docs" » "Cerca nella documentazione"
"Search site" » "Cerca nel sito"
Can "Cerca nella documentazione" be abbreviated to "Cerca nella doc" without
losing its meaning?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Graham Percival"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: Quick way to recreate docs
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: Quick
Sorry, I forgot to send the comments.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4931043/diff/1/mf/feta-noteheads.mf
File mf/feta-noteheads.mf (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4931043/diff/1/mf/feta-noteheads.mf#newcode168
mf/feta-noteheads.mf:168: gap# := (0.95 - 0.008 * design_size) *
stemthick#;
Yo
Just a quick review.
Bertrand
http://codereview.appspot.com/4931043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Il giorno gio, 25/08/2011 alle 13.38 +0100, Phil Holmes ha scritto:
> I've got a proposed patch that gets rid of the search box on the Lilypond
> website and replaces it with 2 boxes - "Search docs" and "Search site". The
> former searches all the lilypond site, the latter only the documentation
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Phil Holmes" ;
; ;
;
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 10:11 PM
Subject: Re: Adds a site search to website and improves doc
search(issue4894053)
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 09:32:50PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
-
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:40 AM, wrote:
> Pushed as 29d1121d260318ed07f152c346a1a69e5dadb69d.
>
> Many thanks to Joe and Han-Wen for your comments.
>
> Han-Wen: I didn't hear back from you regarding the intervals for minmax,
> so I went ahead and kept them returning Real values. Lemme know if yo
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Mike Solomon wrote:
> I have verified via pacifier prints that the pure heights of the flag are
> being taken from the stencil function and are going into the spacing engine
> in separation-item.cc. However, in theory, this patch should have null
> effect on t
I've got a proposed patch that gets rid of the search box on the Lilypond
website and replaces it with 2 boxes - "Search docs" and "Search site". The
former searches all the lilypond site, the latter only the documentation.
Separately, I have available code that automatically produces the corre
Reviewers: Graham Percival,
Message:
Please review.
Description:
This is an updated patch to put the missing image files back into
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.html#examples.
It adds an extra element to the path to ly-examples (web/) which fixes
up the links in web-b
On Aug 25, 2011, at 12:03 PM, Mike Solomon wrote:
> On Aug 24, 2011, at 11:53 PM, n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>
>
> Thanks for your suggestions Neil!
>
> I'm holding off on pushing the patch because I have noticed a spacing
> discrepancy in a few regtests. See the attached, where "old" is
On Do., 25. Aug. 2011 09:11:49 CEST, Mike Solomon wrote:
> The issue with Finale and Sibelius exporting is user overrides. I can
> drag a markup over the last note in my score to be in the position of
> the title and it'll look just fine in Finale, but LilyPond will have no
> clue what to do wit
Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
> I don't think it's that easy, in particular if you want to get output
> that you can send to a publisher without being thrown out of the
> office...
I don't think this is a goal that anyone finds worthwile to work
on or pay for.
Consider the facts that --triggered by
Michael Ellis writes:
> That sounds encouraging. So how far away are we from being able to
> handle a more realistic score, say a string quartet or a 4-part choral
> score with with lyrics and piano reduction?
Quite far.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance
Make sure to consider cases like:
\relative c'' {
\stopStaff
\override Staff.StaffSymbol #'line-count = #1
\startStaff
b1
\stopStaff
\revert Staff.StaffSymbol #'line-count
\startStaff
b1
}
I haven't tested it out to see if the result is meh, but if you think it
leads to a bad res
Pushed as 29d1121d260318ed07f152c346a1a69e5dadb69d.
Many thanks to Joe and Han-Wen for your comments.
Han-Wen: I didn't hear back from you regarding the intervals for minmax,
so I went ahead and kept them returning Real values. Lemme know if you
still want them to return intervals and I'll uplo
Pushed as 29d1121d260318ed07f152c346a1a69e5dadb69d.
Keith: I ultimately decided not to change the textLengthOn in the
regtest so that the test can test if objects from the
new-fingering-engraver have their callbacks chained in the correct
order. Even if this leads to an aesthetically inferior re
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Hey all,
This patch changes the name of several variables that I'll need to work
on my beam slope stuff. If any developers are working on
beam-quanting.cc and would like me to wait until their patch is pushed,
please speak up today. Otherwise, I'll push it so that I can c
On Aug 25, 2011, at 9:05 AM, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
> 2. Finale's and Sibelius' MusicXML import isn't 100% perfect either. Yes,
> when Finale exports a MusicXML file and then imports the same MusicXML file
> the result will be quite good. But I would not be surprised if importing
> MusicXML
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
But even with shortcomings, MusicXML would make it easier to convert/import
Lilypond created scores to other programs. Post-editing may
still be needed, but will much less work than when using MIDI export/import.
I meant: will BE much less work
Interesting discussion. And, being primarily a user and not (really) a
developer, I hardly can wait to see where this will lead to. But I will be
patient.
The way I see it: The ideal case would be if a lilypond score that is
converted to musicXML and then imported to some other music scoring
36 matches
Mail list logo
