On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 07:56:10PM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote: > Of the 14 patches for review, 6 are less than 48 hours old and too young > to be on this list,
What? There's no point waiting. If something is marked patch-review, then (space permitting) it should go on the next countdown. Obviously is something is still languishing in patch-new, then don't put it on the countdown... and if there's any patch-review with known objections, it shouldn't go on the countdown (and should instead be marked patch-needs_work). I'm aware of approximately 15 patches which haven't gotten into the system as patch-new, so I don't think there's cause for celebration yet. I haven't made a bigger fuss about those because there's plenty of stuff already in patch-review, but once those are under control, we should either recruit a new volunteer to find those lost patches, or I'll do it myself. Let's not let up the pressure yet. (I also don't like having 21 patches languishing as patch-needs_work; I think that once the backlog is gone and we can force reviews within 48 hours, developers will have more motivation to make the required changes and get another set of reviews) Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
