On 2011/06/30 00:13:20, J_lowe wrote:
On 2011/06/29 16:32:33, http://mike_apollinemike.com wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2011, at 3:25 PM, mailto:pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Currently, Lilypond does not factor in note position w/ respect to
the staff
> symbol in order to place the tuplet bracket. No
On 2011/07/01 16:13:00, mike_apollinemike.com wrote:
On Jul 1, 2011, at 6:09 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> maybe I misunderstand the problem. Are you fixing the slope of the
> bracket (should be sloped), or the position of the number (not
> centered on the bracket?)
The position of the num
> * input/regression/song-skip-noword.ly
>
> reset *skip-word* to default at end of file to prevent override
> leaking into other regression tests
Just curious: How can this happen? While handling the regression
suite, more than a single test file is processed by a single lilypond
call?
Pass Make but I ge a difference in one reg test
see
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1563#c3
where I have posted the screenshot
http://codereview.appspot.com/4693043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://l
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Here's a patch which implements my proposal for a separate context
modifications init file
(http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-07/msg00359.html).
Description:
Move \RemoveEmptyStaves to new file for context modifications.
This allows \RemoveEmptyStaves t
2011/7/12 Jan Warchoł :
> Jan's translation 446103a87933b297c209e87fec94e97fe9462ad0 is also my
> latest commit. make test-baseline worked for me.
> I'll build again from scratch just to make sure.
I confirm: make test-baseline compiles from scratch.
cheers,
Janek
__
Reviewers: ,
Description:
Fix #1507: Inconsistent \festival output in regression testing.
* input/regression/song-skip-noword.ly
reset *skip-word* to default at end of file to prevent override
leaking
into other regression tests
* ly/festival.ly (festivalsyl):
use paramaterize to set *s
LGTM.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4654090/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Jan's translation 446103a87933b297c209e87fec94e97fe9462ad0 is also my
latest commit. make test-baseline worked for me.
I'll build again from scratch just to make sure.
2011/7/12 James Lowe :
> Hello,
>
> I'v done this a couple of times now and cannot get a make test-baseline to
> work
>
> After
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 07:39:20PM +, James Lowe wrote:
> I'v done this a couple of times now and cannot get a make test-baseline to
> work
...
> Could someone else verify this?
Can't reproduce. Did you completely remove the build/ dir before
each attempt? Remember that our build system can
2011/7/11 cab :
> About the website, I programmed an engine to search for melodies in
> scores, and then I use lilypond to display the score and to hear the music
Ahh, sounds very nice. However, i haven't found any "links" section
on lilypond.org and i think that it doesn't really fit to the
"Pub
Hello,
I'v done this a couple of times now and cannot get a make test-baseline to work
After pulling (Jan's NL translation is my latest commit in gitk) I get
--snip--Traceback (most recent call last):
File "../../scripts/lilypond-book.py", line 684, in
main ()
File "../../scripts/lilypo
in light of the growing consensus for "combined" logfiles for the build
system -- and given that lilypond only produces stuff on stderr and
apparently this isn't going to change -- I wonder if it might be better
to redirect both stdout and sterr to a single .log file.
I'm happy with pushing this
- Original Message -
From:
To: ; ;
Cc: ;
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: Adds redirect-lilypond-output option to lilypond-book
(issue4664060)
in light of the growing consensus for "combined" logfiles for the build
system -- and given that lilypond only produces
http://codereview.appspot.com/4654090/diff/16002/lily/context.cc
File lily/context.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4654090/diff/16002/lily/context.cc#newcode496
lily/context.cc:496: bool type_check_ok;
On 2011/07/11 19:17:39, Neil Puttock wrote:
?
assert (type_check_ok);
Wow...I
15 matches
Mail list logo