----- Original Message -----
From: <percival.music...@gmail.com>
To: <philehol...@googlemail.com>; <em...@philholmes.net>;
<gra...@percival-music.ca>
Cc: <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>; <re...@codereview.appspotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: Adds redirect-lilypond-output option to lilypond-book
(issue4664060)
in light of the growing consensus for "combined" logfiles for the build
system -- and given that lilypond only produces stuff on stderr and
apparently this isn't going to change -- I wonder if it might be better
to redirect both stdout and sterr to a single .log file.
I'm happy with pushing this patch as-is and changing this later, though.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4664060/
I'd like to propose as a GOP topic that we _do_ change how LilyPond produces
output. Only using stderr is by no means common in the world of GNU-type
programs.
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
