2011/4/14 James Lowe :
> I use Lilygit.tcl every single day. I've just used it this morning - I can't
> produce patches without it.
> I have to admit that I have not had to use lilygit to pull a brand new
> install for a few weeks, but nothing has been added to Lilygit.tcl for a lot
> longer tha
On Apr 15, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/15/11 12:32 PM, "Matthias Kilian" wrote:
>
>> [random notes from soneone who is *not* actively hacking on LilyPond,
>> so feel free to ignore it ;-)]
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 03:29:52PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
>>> The
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 07:11:21PM -0400, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>
> I agree - it is for this reason that I feel the only two solutions are to:
>
> (1) Freeze pushes to the master branch save ones that are
> explicitly authorized by Graham.
Oh god no.
> (2) Keep working at our normal
2011/4/15 Graham Percival :
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 01:07:02AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> 2011/4/7 Graham Percival
>> > You severely over-estimate either the number of "seasoned
>> > developers", or the skill of most people on this mailing list.
> ...
>> > The same goes for vir
On 4/15/11 12:32 PM, "Matthias Kilian" wrote:
> [random notes from soneone who is *not* actively hacking on LilyPond,
> so feel free to ignore it ;-)]
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 03:29:52PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
>> The reason that I'm pessimistic is that we racked up a huge amount
>>
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> 1. is the way to go. Sure, it would put some pressure on people
> working on big changes, which kind of sucks (it could even slow
> down implementing cool new stuff). On the other hand, it enforces
> smaller steps towards new features, whic
2011/4/15 Graham Percival :
> But the development community has a very huge problem:
> - the very skilled members generally have full-time jobs and
> familes.
Then Graham, I'm afraid you and I desperately are without any skill :-)
> - it takes about 5 hours a week simply to keep "up to date"
>
[random notes from soneone who is *not* actively hacking on LilyPond,
so feel free to ignore it ;-)]
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 03:29:52PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> The reason that I'm pessimistic is that we racked up a huge amount
> of "technical debt" (i.e. bugs) during 2.11 and the early pha
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:19:12AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 4/15/11 9:23 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
> > Great! I'll make another unstable release tomorrow and merge it
> > into stable/2.14, and thereafter you can cherry-pick at will.
> > I'll make all future 2.13 releases from stable
On 4/15/11 9:23 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 08:33:20AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> On 4/15/11 8:29 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>>
>>> But I suppose we can come back to that debate later. For now, who
>>> is volunteering to handle the cherry-picking?
>>
>> I will
On 4/15/11 9:23 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 08:33:20AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> On 4/15/11 8:29 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>>
>>> But I suppose we can come back to that debate later. For now, who
>>> is volunteering to handle the cherry-picking?
>>
>> I w
Am Freitag, 15. April 2011, 17:41:05 schrieb Bertrand Bordage:
> A shorter example would be :
>
> \version "2.13.60"
> \markup \page-link ##f "a"
Fixed.
Cheers,
Reinhold
--
--
Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://rei
Hello,
Reinhold's last commit (3d571d9c80b7855422c96ecc6966bcbfa4dfb9ff) just broke
the table of contents when we use a TOC command before a bookpart :
\version "2.13.60"
\book {
\markuplines \table-of-contents
\tocItem "a"
\bookpart {
\tocItem "the first"
\score {{ a
A short
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 08:33:20AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 4/15/11 8:29 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
> > But I suppose we can come back to that debate later. For now, who
> > is volunteering to handle the cherry-picking?
>
> I will cherry pick.
Great! I'll make another unstable rel
On 4/15/11 8:29 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:08:08AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 7:30 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
>> wrote:
this issue was exposed due to a (seemingly innocuous) one-line change
by Mike. Can I ask that you branch
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:08:08AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 7:30 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
> wrote:
> >> this issue was exposed due to a (seemingly innocuous) one-line change
> >> by Mike. Can I ask that you branch off the 2.14 branch so the release
> >> candidate
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 01:57:52PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> Attached is a patch that includes this.
Thanks, pushed.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reviewers: ,
Message:
This is in response to Mike's last entry
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1612
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/4440041/
Affected files:
M Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely
Index: Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely
diff --
Attached is a patch that includes this.
2011/4/15 Tom Cloyd :
> This deals with the problem of getting correct midi output when playing of
> repeats is desired AND the score has multiple voices.
>
> I suggest insertion of the following sentence (as its own paragraph)
> immediately before the sente
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 09:36:36AM -0400, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> For the past couple weeks, when running the regtests, all of the midi files
> have failed on my system:
Can't reproduce here.
> warning: found more than 5 voices on a staff, expect bad output
This warning is expected.
> F
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 01:07:02AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> 2011/4/7 Graham Percival
> > You severely over-estimate either the number of "seasoned
> > developers", or the skill of most people on this mailing list.
...
> > The same goes for virtually every aspect of lilypond. The
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:23:56AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> |git --git-dir=/home/janek/lilypond-git/.git fetch --depth 1 2>@1
> )
> But then nothing happens.
Confirmed. :(
Thanks, added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1615
Could somebody look into this? It's a serio
Thanks to Carl's help, I've fixed the text spanner formatting. I think
it's ready to be pushed.
(I'll add it to the next patches countdown)
http://codereview.appspot.com/4373046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.
23 matches
Mail list logo
