On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Matthias Kilian <k...@outback.escape.de> wrote: > 1. is the way to go. Sure, it would put some pressure on people > working on big changes, which kind of sucks (it could even slow > down implementing cool new stuff). On the other hand, it enforces > smaller steps towards new features, which is good (easier to track > down regressions, easier to *understand* what's going on).
I'm not entirely sure everything can be implemented using small steps (e.g. spacing code overhaul, as has happened in the past). As I suggested this summer, the new Fedora branching model looks pretty interesting to me: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Branched (then again, developing a whole distribution is certainly very different from developing a relatively specialized project such as Lily). Of course, it does require some resources. But (as always) I do trust Carl to be exactly the person we need :-) Cheers, Valentin. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
