On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> On 22 March 2011 22:48, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>
>> Would an acceptable alternative be giving the TrillPitchAccidental the
>> inline-accidental-interface?
>
> Sounds good to me.
Sorry - I was confused. I was thinking that trill-pitch
Reviewers: ,
Message:
I'm using this is in a piece I'm working on and figured it may be useful
in LilyPond. Let me know what you think!
Description:
Allows glissandi to be continuous at line breaks
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/4273098/
Affected files:
M lily/line-span
On 10 March 2011 10:06, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> On Mar 9, 2011, at 10:17 PM, n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Does `annotation-whiteout' do anything special? If not, the existing
>> property `whiteout' should suffice.
>>
>
> It puts a whiteout only around the annotation instead of whiting ou
On 2011/03/20 12:00:34, MikeSol wrote:
This is now fully functional.
The only issue is that, for auto-beams, I don't have a good method yet
for
keeping note-heads that are part of the beam out of the covered grobs
list.
This is doable, though - I just have to think of the cleanest way.
Befo
Neil Puttock writes:
> On 22 March 2011 17:20, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> This.
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/4311041>
>>
>> Please improve/discuss. This looks totally insane but does not actually
>> change the existing absurd realities for single-digit unsigned numbers.
>
> I'm afraid I c
On 22 March 2011 22:48, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> Would an acceptable alternative be giving the TrillPitchAccidental the
> inline-accidental-interface?
Sounds good to me.
Cheers,
Neil
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http:
On Mar 22, 2011, at 6:46 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> On 21 March 2011 01:59, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
>> The intention of the fix is incorrect, but can you make the logic
>> explicit? That is, add an interface symbol for "normal" accidentals
>> (normal-accidental-interface, inline-accidental-inte
On 21 March 2011 01:59, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> The intention of the fix is incorrect, but can you make the logic
> explicit? That is, add an interface symbol for "normal" accidentals
> (normal-accidental-interface, inline-accidental-interface, ... ?) and
> acknowledge that explicitly? If not,
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Here's a proposed patch for Issue 1569.
Please review.
Thanks,
Carl
Description:
Fix 1569: Bad behavior of NoteNames context
Changed default value of 'staff-affinity to #UP
Changed default spacing parameters to be the same as for Lyrics
context
Added some docu
On 22 March 2011 12:59, Colin Campbell wrote:
> @dev: Ed's question comes from the recent changes to percent repeats and
> beat slashes: is it possible to revert the double slash now used for short
> (<1/8) notes and mixed note patterns, to a single slash as used prior to
> 2.13.51?
Yes:
\relat
On 22 March 2011 17:20, David Kastrup wrote:
> This.
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4311041>
>
> Please improve/discuss. This looks totally insane but does not actually
> change the existing absurd realities for single-digit unsigned numbers.
I'm afraid I can't even get as far as running `ma
On 3/22/11 11:20 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:48:21PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Perhaps i'll aim for obliterating DIGIT altogether.
>>
>> I certainly can't think of any case in which we actually need/want
>> a DIGIT. I see that DIG
Dear list,
It seems there is some inconsistency in how lilypond-book processes a
master tex file with inputed and included tex files. First I would like
to get a clear idea of the current behavior and it's intended use case.
So, this is what I found. Upon a call to
lilypond-book master.lytex
Martin Tarenskeen schreef op di 22-03-2011 om 08:47 [+0100]:
> But please try the attached example (testmidi.mid).
Nice bug. Fixed in HEAD.
Thanks,
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
Graham Percival writes:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:48:21PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Perhaps i'll aim for obliterating DIGIT altogether.
>
> I certainly can't think of any case in which we actually need/want
> a DIGIT. I see that DIGIT was added in release/0.1.49, back in
> 1998-03-17, as
Top posting - apologies - the penalty of 2 windows users.
James - I'm almost certain Ghostscript is completely standalone. In the
days when Lily left the .ps files in the directory by default, I wrote a
program that I associated with .ps and which called Ghostscript - I found it
handy when I'
Of course, I agree that we should get rid of the two-pass algorithm. But
it's really tricky to do it the clean way :o\
As the issues I pointed out need deep changes, I think the two-pass
algorithm is better than nothing.
For the moment, we can also avoid these issues by displaying footnotes
anot
Hello,
Sorry if this is a basic question, but I have found an issue with Windows 7 and
the latest SP1 that causes GS errors during LP compilation
A bug has been added to the tracker - actually it was closed as I was not able
to reproduce this on a clean system but have subsequently found someon
On 11-03-22 01:09 AM, Ed Gordijn wrote:
Hi Collin,
Ok! That is clear!
Do you know if it is possible to override the stencil? I try to do
that but didn't succeed. Or should I post this question to the list?
Thank you, by the way, for this wonderfull support!
Greetings, Ed
Thanks for the kind
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Martin Tarenskeen schreef op ma 14-03-2011 om 13:10 [+0100]:
Which reminds me: midi2ly still needs a lot of work. In short: it is quite
useless.
Have a look at the latest version. It's starting to work.
Great, it is already much better! I m
20 matches
Mail list logo
