On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 10:23:36PM -0700, Colin Campbell wrote:
> Actually, and before I go stepping on toes in all directions, I
> wouldn't mind some guidance on a couple of things, please. CG 12.2
> Meisters describes the Frog Meister as being responsible for code
> patches from (relatively) ine
On 11-03-04 02:09 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 01:43:19PM -0700, Colin Campbell wrote:
On 11-03-04 01:05 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/patch-handling
For the sake of keeping an eye on the issues list, looking for
"patc
> i suggest making unbeamed 32nd stems a bit shorter than they are
> now. The main reason for doing so is to better match the stem
> length of the beamed notes.
While I generally agree with your suggestions, I'm not sure that it is
the right solution. In many of the `red' cases of the `old' ima
2011/3/4 Janek Warchoł :
> Hi,
> this is the next step of making stems and flags more beautiful:
> i suggest making unbeamed 32nd stems a bit shorter than they are now.
..
> Therefore i call for shortening 32nd unbeamed notes by 0.25 ss. Do you
> agree?
SGTM - I don't think we ever put this much t
Mike Solomon ufl.edu> writes:
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4182071
>
> I have no clue how convert-ly works: would anyone like to take on the task of
implementing these conversions
> in that script?
>
> Cheers,
> MS
Well, eventually somebody has to clean up because your blanket NOT_SMART
On 3/4/11 4:42 PM, "Janek Warchoł" wrote:
> Hi,
> Therefore i call for shortening 32nd unbeamed notes by 0.25 ss. Do you agree?
I can't see any downside to the proposal. So I agree.
Thanks,
Carl
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.o
On 4 March 2011 22:56, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> I think that the commit with SHA1 ID b02ea152073d11899bb17eecabe4d47a6009756d
> may have caused this:
>
> Writing "internals.texi"...ERROR: In procedure procedure-name:
> ERROR: Wrong type argument in position 1: #f
>
> I'm not sure, though, a
I think that the commit with SHA1 ID b02ea152073d11899bb17eecabe4d47a6009756d
may have caused this:
Writing "internals.texi"...ERROR: In procedure procedure-name:
ERROR: Wrong type argument in position 1: #f
I'm not sure, though, and don't have time to do a git bisect now. Can anyone
confirm t
On Mar 4, 2011, at 5:02 PM, mts...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thank you very much, Han Wen, for your comments. It optimizes several
> sluggish parts of the algorithm and makes for more maintainable &
> readable code.
>
> I feel that, when you read over my comments below, you'll see that the
> stuff in t
On 3/4/11 1:05 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:38:19AM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> On 3/4/11 11:09 AM, "Colin Campbell" wrote:
>>
>>> On 11-03-04 10:54 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 3/4/11 10:31 AM, "Colin Campbell" wrote:
>
> [subject: wiki or not?]
>
>
Thank you very much, Han Wen, for your comments. It optimizes several
sluggish parts of the algorithm and makes for more maintainable &
readable code.
I feel that, when you read over my comments below, you'll see that the
stuff in the balloon engraver is necessary to get correctly working
annota
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 01:43:19PM -0700, Colin Campbell wrote:
> On 11-03-04 01:05 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
> >http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/patch-handling
> >
> For the sake of keeping an eye on the issues list, looking for
> "patch-review" then applying the test as li
On 11-03-04 01:05 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
Oh, there _is_ one way: if more people took on more of my current
duties, I'd have more time left in my 10 hours, and could thus
spend more time helping this process. The biggest/easiest time
sink for me right now is checking and bestowing Patch-revi
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:38:19AM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 3/4/11 11:09 AM, "Colin Campbell" wrote:
>
> > On 11-03-04 10:54 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> >> On 3/4/11 10:31 AM, "Colin Campbell" wrote:
> >>
[subject: wiki or not?]
> >>> I'm the noob here, so I'll defer to greater wisdom.
Am 04.03.2011 um 20:41 schrieb Graham Percival:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 05:17:39PM +0100, Patrick Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm, it doesn't apply for me. Could you do a git pull -r , and then
>>> try making the patch again?
>>>
>> Sorry for that. Don't know what I'm doing wrong. How about this o
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 05:17:39PM +0100, Patrick Schmidt wrote:
>
> > Hmm, it doesn't apply for me. Could you do a git pull -r , and then
> > try making the patch again?
> >
> Sorry for that. Don't know what I'm doing wrong. How about this one?
Thanks, it applied without any problems whatsoeve
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 07:43:34PM +0100, Patrick Schmidt wrote:
>
> Am 04.03.2011 um 19:14 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
>
> > It should be
> > easy for Graham to fix this before applying.
Oops, I didn't notice. But yes, it will be.
> That is strange! I'm using Mac OS X/Ubuntu (Lilydev in
> Virtual
Am 04.03.2011 um 19:14 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
> Patrick Schmidt wrote Friday, March 04, 2011 4:17 PM
>>
>>> Hmm, it doesn't apply for me. Could you do a git pull -r , and then
>>> try making the patch again?
>>>
>> Sorry for that. Don't know what I'm doing wrong. How about this one?
>
> The
On 3/4/11 11:09 AM, "Colin Campbell" wrote:
> On 11-03-04 10:54 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> On 3/4/11 10:31 AM, "Colin Campbell" wrote:
>>
>>> I'm the noob here, so I'll defer to greater wisdom. A couple of
>>> thoughts do occur, though: using the CG to collect discoveries, insights
>>> etc. h
Patrick Schmidt wrote Friday, March 04, 2011 4:17 PM
Hmm, it doesn't apply for me. Could you do a git pull -r , and
then
try making the patch again?
Sorry for that. Don't know what I'm doing wrong. How about this
one?
The problem is the line endings. They are DOS but should be Unix
in pa
On 11-03-04 10:54 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 3/4/11 10:31 AM, "Colin Campbell" wrote:
On 11-03-04 05:55 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Lily devel"
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: build system work
On 3
On 3/4/11 10:31 AM, "Colin Campbell" wrote:
> On 11-03-04 05:55 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
>> - Original Message - From: "Graham Percival"
>>
>> To: "Phil Holmes"
>> Cc: "Lily devel"
>> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 12:50 PM
>> Subject: Re: build system work
>>
>>
>>> On 3/4/11, Phil Holm
On 11-03-04 09:23 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
2011/3/4 Graham Percival:
To that end, I've just added a new CG 12 Build system notes. The goal
is to have a "wiki-like" dump of whatever info we suspect about the
build system.
Does that include the _doc_ build system?
I'll take the liberty of rep
On 11-03-04 05:55 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Lily devel"
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: build system work
On 3/4/11, Phil Holmes wrote:
I'm wondering whether we should actually start with a real Wi
Hi mike,
wow , you have a penchant for attacking difficult problems!
A lot of comments below; overall my impression is that you try to do
everything at the same time. It would be easier (also for reviewers) if
you feed them your ideas bit by bit. I think that the whole balloon
hack and position
2011/3/4 Graham Percival :
> To that end, I've just added a new CG 12 Build system notes. The goal
> is to have a "wiki-like" dump of whatever info we suspect about the
> build system.
Does that include the _doc_ build system?
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.
> Hmm, it doesn't apply for me. Could you do a git pull -r , and then
> try making the patch again?
>
Sorry for that. Don't know what I'm doing wrong. How about this one?
Cheers,
patrick
> Cheers,
> - Graham
--
GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 Euro/mtl.! Jetzt mit
gratis Handy-Flat! http://port
Hello,
)-Original Message-
)From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
)[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On
)Behalf Of Patrick Schmidt
)Sent: 04 March 2011 13:15
)To: Phil Holmes
)Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
)Subject: Re: VirtualBox
)
)
)Am 0
Hi Phil
I did this a few days ago. No problems. I sent a note
about it to -devel, but it didn't seem to get distributed.
I've attached it.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To:
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 12:58 PM
Subject: VirtualBox
I use VirtualBox to run the Li
On 3/4/11, Patrick Schmidt wrote:
> Thanks for your help!
Hmm, it doesn't apply for me. Could you do a git pull -r , and then
try making the patch again?
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mai
Am 04.03.2011 um 13:58 schrieb Phil Holmes:
> I use VirtualBox to run the LilyPond Ubuntu virtual machine, and for a week
> or so it's been nagging me to upgrade to 4.0.4. Has anyone done this, and is
> it painless?
I upgraded to 4.0.4. At the moment lily-git.tcl doesn't work for me but I don'
I use VirtualBox to run the LilyPond Ubuntu virtual machine, and for a week
or so it's been nagging me to upgrade to 4.0.4. Has anyone done this, and
is it painless?
--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Lily devel"
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: build system work
On 3/4/11, Phil Holmes wrote:
I'm wondering whether we should actually start with a real Wiki - like
the
one used for the regtests.
On 3/4/11, Phil Holmes wrote:
> I'm wondering whether we should actually start with a real Wiki - like the
> one used for the regtests. Doing this would mean that any work done would
> be immediately visible, rather than having to pull git and make docs, which
> would save me oodles of time (a te
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Lily devel"
Cc: "Phil Holmes"
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 12:16 PM
Subject: build system work
There is widespread dissatisfaction with our current build system.
Replacing it is estimated to take at least 200 hours, but that's a
tota
Looks good, and there's no complaints. Could you send me the full patch
for pushing?
http://codereview.appspot.com/4186049/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
There is widespread dissatisfaction with our current build system.
Replacing it is estimated to take at least 200 hours, but that's a
total shot in the dark. However, a few people have expressed interest
in working on this.
IMO, such a project should begin by figuring out what the current
build s
On 3/4/11 3:39 AM, "James Lowe" wrote:
> Zhang
>
>
>
> From: zhangxy [mailto:zhangxy290626...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 04 March 2011 06:55
> To: James Lowe
> Subject: Is it possible to get the code coverage of scheme in lilypond
>
> Dear James,
> Now I want to analyze the test coverage of lil
On 3/4/11, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
> Thanks!
> {dumb typo} * 2
Thanks, pushed.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Zhang
From: zhangxy [mailto:zhangxy290626...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 March 2011 06:55
To: James Lowe
Subject: Is it possible to get the code coverage of scheme in lilypond
Dear James,
Now I want to analyze the test coverage of lilypond. I use gcov for c++, but I
couldn't find an effective tool for
40 matches
Mail list logo
