On 3/4/11, Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net> wrote: > I'm wondering whether we should actually start with a real Wiki - like the > one used for the regtests. Doing this would mean that any work done would > be immediately visible, rather than having to pull git and make docs, which > would save me oodles of time (a technical phrase).
I dislike wikis; it's yet one more markup format to learn, I can't easily edit them with my normal text editor, they rely on having an internet connection, there's no permanent record, and they don't fit into the current development skills used for lilypond. Also, once you've built the docs once -- and if there's no build system changes from the translations -- then rebuilding the CG is really fast, since the CG doesn't include any @lilypond example. However, if you and Colin would find it easier to work on a wiki, then by all means do so. There's no point adding artificial constraints to this task; it's hard enough as it is. But please move material into the CG from time to time (say, once a month?), otherwise we'll lose whatever documentation you two write. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
