> i suggest making unbeamed 32nd stems a bit shorter than they are
> now. The main reason for doing so is to better match the stem
> length of the beamed notes.
While I generally agree with your suggestions, I'm not sure that it is
the right solution. In many of the `red' cases of the `old' image, I
think that the length of the unbeamed 32nd stems are fine, but the
length of the beamed stems you are comparing to are too short. To be
more precise, I would increase the minimum stem length for beamed
32nds so that the beams snap to the next, more distant staff line.
Have you played with that also?
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
