Re: Fix Issue 1290 (issue3832046)

2011-01-01 Thread joeneeman
I don't know if it's important, but it may be worth mentioning somewhere that skyline-horizontal-padding works differently for VerticalAxisGroup and System. (Because in VerticalAxisGroup, skyline-horizontal-padding takes effect while the outside-staff-grobs are being placed). http://codereview.a

Fix Issue 1290 (issue3832046)

2011-01-01 Thread Carl . D . Sorensen
Reviewers: , Message: Here is a patch to fix issue 1290. It works, but it may need to be cleaned up. I'm not sure the code is as elegant as it could be. I'm not really comfortable with all of the C++ syntax used in lilypond. Please review it carefully, and let me know how it can be improved.

Re: critical issues

2011-01-01 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 01:06:04PM +0100, Karl Hammar wrote: > Graham: > > Of course, writing artistic and research grants is a non-trivial > > amount of work, and it's hardly guaranteed to have any results. > > But I think that with the right angle -- be that "collaborative > > folk music archival

Re: Broken Link in CG to http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/linkdoc/

2011-01-01 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 03:38:47PM +, James Lowe wrote: > In CG 5.4.3 Checking Cross References there is a para that refers to Thanks, added as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1469 Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list

Re: lilypond too noisy on the cmd line

2011-01-01 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 02:25:57AM -0500, David Santamauro wrote: > > On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 10:19:18 + > Graham Percival wrote: > > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1074 > > Patches appreciated. Unfortunately I doubt that anything will > > happen unless you personally work

Re: issue 1464 (was: a plea to new contributors)

2011-01-01 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Matthias Kilian wrote: > On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 02:10:04PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote: > > I don't know why gdb doesn't find paper-column.hh, but anyaway... > > it looks like Item::get_column() returns NULL, because its parent's > > get_column() returns NULL (I c

Re: a plea to new contributors

2011-01-01 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 12:21:24PM +0100, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > > I have a flight on January 4th from London to New York. I would be happy to > devote the entire flight to solving two issues, but I do not want to > duplicate the work of someone else. These are the current Critical iss

Issue 1290

2011-01-01 Thread Carl Sorensen
I have a patch for Issue 1290 that fixes the improper spacing. I am currently doing a regression test. Thanks, Carl ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: issue 1464 (was: a plea to new contributors)

2011-01-01 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 08:14:36PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote: > On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 02:10:04PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote: > > I don't know why gdb doesn't find paper-column.hh, but anyaway... > > it looks like Item::get_column() returns NULL, because its parent's > > get_column() returns

Fix 1464 (segfault with R1 and metronome) (issue3858041)

2011-01-01 Thread percival . music . ca
Reviewers: , Message: Fixes a segfault, passes the regtest comparison, code by Matthias Kilian. Description: Fix 1464 (segfault with R1 and metronome) This code came from Mathias Kilian. Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/3858041/ Affected files: A input/regression/metronom

Re: PDF hyperlinks

2011-01-01 Thread Dan Eble
On 2010-12-27, at 15:14 , Dan Eble wrote: > Here's some prototype code which works for me in 2.13.9. Correction: 2.13.18. -- Dan ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Updates to bagpipe.ly (issue3825043)

2011-01-01 Thread percival . music . ca
looks mostly ok, but I don't know what's up with those beaming rules. http://codereview.appspot.com/3825043/diff/1/ly/bagpipe.ly File ly/bagpipe.ly (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/3825043/diff/1/ly/bagpipe.ly#newcode72 ly/bagpipe.ly:72: #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 1 2 'St

Re: issue 1464 (was: a plea to new contributors)

2011-01-01 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 02:10:04PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote: > I don't know why gdb doesn't find paper-column.hh, but anyaway... > it looks like Item::get_column() returns NULL, because its parent's > get_column() returns NULL (I checked that the parent on the X_AXIS > itself is not NULL). Bis

Re: Issue 1268 in lilypond: [PATCH] span-bar problem

2011-01-01 Thread Benkő Pál
hi Joe, >> do you think my patch is a good start? > > Yes, but you need to be careful about what happens when bar-size is set. > Currently, your patch will break (for example) input/regression/drums.ly > because it ignores bar-size. well, I admit I haven't run regtests, but I did now and (having

issue 1464 (was: a plea to new contributors)

2011-01-01 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 06:51:49AM +, Graham Percival wrote: > The next step in issue 1464 is just to create a backtrace. See the blurb below this mail (no, I'm not going to sign up at google for adding it there). I don't know why gdb doesn't find paper-column.hh, but anyaway... it looks lik

Re: Updates to bagpipe.ly

2011-01-01 Thread Sven Axelsson
On 31 December 2010 23:53, Graham Percival wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 05:35:43PM +0100, Sven Axelsson wrote: >> Perhaps a starting point would be if someone could have a look at what >> I'm doing in https://github.com/svenax/bagpipemusic/. The relevant >> file is bagpipe_new.ly, and there ar

Re: lilypond too noisy on the cmd line

2011-01-01 Thread David Kastrup
Mark Veltzer writes: > - stderr is called stderr and not stddiag since it is intended for errors. I > agree that stdout is intended for further processing but lilypond *does not* > create any further data for further processing so stdout could be used for > version and other stuff much like other

Re: lilypond too noisy on the cmd line

2011-01-01 Thread David Santamauro
Hi, On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 10:19:18 + Graham Percival wrote: > On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 09:49:10AM +, Mark Veltzer wrote: > > - version, progress and general messages which are not error > > messages should go to stdout and NOT stderr. > > Good point; I've added this as > http://code.google

Re: lilypond too noisy on the cmd line

2011-01-01 Thread Mark Veltzer
Hello all, This is in response to David Kastrup. - startup and shutdown messages. These are not usually omitted to stderr, or at least 99.99% of the tools out there do not do it. Most tools actually *have no* startup and shutdown messages. If you have other info then I'd appreciate a list of famo

Re: default .ly file in Windows Install seems to be

2011-01-01 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Jonathan Kulp" To: "Graham Percival" Cc: "James Lowe" ; Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 1:33 AM Subject: Re: default .ly file in Windows Install seems to be On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Graham Percival wrote: On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:30:29AM +000

Re: critical issues

2011-01-01 Thread Karl Hammar
Graham: > On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 09:10:49AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote: ... > > But maybe there is a group of LilyPond philanthropists who can afford > > this and are willing to do so... > I'm not optimistic about that; I think a more realistic > opportunity would be to get some grant money from

Re: lilypond too noisy on the cmd line

2011-01-01 Thread David Kastrup
Mark Veltzer writes: > First is first: thanks for a great piece of software. > > This is a long standing feature request for me which you probably got from > hundreds of other users but I sent it anyway since I see it as a major pain. > > When I run lilypond it is too noisy. It prints out lots of

Re: lilypond too noisy on the cmd line

2011-01-01 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 09:49:10AM +, Mark Veltzer wrote: > - version, progress and general messages which are not error messages should > go > to stdout and NOT stderr. Good point; I've added this as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1468 > - a --quiet flag should be added

Re: critical issues

2011-01-01 Thread David Kastrup
Graham Percival writes: > In my idle moments, I like to discourage myself by trying to > figure out how long it would take to achieve something > "reasonable" for users. Let's play this game now, and start > making some unrealistic-but-just-possible assumptions: > 1. "reasonable" means 100 bugs.

lilypond too noisy on the cmd line

2011-01-01 Thread Mark Veltzer
Hello all! First is first: thanks for a great piece of software. This is a long standing feature request for me which you probably got from hundreds of other users but I sent it anyway since I see it as a major pain. When I run lilypond it is too noisy. It prints out lots of stuff (version, prog

Re: critical issues

2011-01-01 Thread David Kastrup
"Keith OHara" writes: > On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:31:23 -0800, Trevor Daniels > wrote: >> ... the concern I had was this. Quite a lot of the >> documentation was written, not by inspecting the code >> to see what was intended, but by experimenting and >> writing up what was found. I certainly wor

Re: critical issues

2011-01-01 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 09:39:37AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > I'm not optimistic about that; I think a more realistic opportunity > > would be to get some grant money from some artistic organization. > > Mhmm. `Programming' in its broadest sense is research, thus getting > grants limits

Re: critical issues

2011-01-01 Thread Jan Warchoł
2011/1/1 Werner LEMBERG : > What we would need is a payed full-time developer.  However, this is > expensive.  Assuming that the programmer has a family with children, > an appartment, etc., and to provide a reasonably good living for him > or her, this would be about 3000 Euros a month here in Aus

Re: critical issues

2011-01-01 Thread Trevor Daniels
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, January 01, 2011 7:16 AM Nope, for precisely the reason you gave earlier: our documentation generally has zero input from programmers, so it's not at all a good representation of "what's intended". We have a set of "intended to be working" examples. They're ca

Re: critical issues

2011-01-01 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I'm not optimistic about that; I think a more realistic opportunity > would be to get some grant money from some artistic organization. Mhmm. `Programming' in its broadest sense is research, thus getting grants limits the number of persons enormously. However, the number of music researchers

Re: critical issues

2011-01-01 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 09:10:49AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > What we would need is a payed full-time developer. That could help. Or at least having a sponsorship page up, which brings us back to the GOP policy list and the current decision not to begin discussing those until we've gotten 2.1

Re: critical issues

2011-01-01 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> What we would need is a payed full-time developer. I have forgotten to say that such a developer needs certain skills in addition to C++ and Scheme, namely being a musician... Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http:/

Re: critical issues

2011-01-01 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Look, we simply *cannot* offer users anything that would be > "reasonable" by most standards. We have "highly embarrassing" bugs > from 2006 that we're not even *pretending* to be working on. We've > been in "release crunch" mode for at least six months. The only > glimmer of hope on the horiz