On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 02:25:57AM -0500, David Santamauro wrote: > > On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 10:19:18 +0000 > Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1074 > > Patches appreciated. Unfortunately I doubt that anything will > > happen unless you personally work on it, but it's "on the books". > > Question: Should the be_verbose_global variable control this? I'm not > sure a new command line argument is really needed as long as it is > agreed upon what verbose is and isn't.
> I added a be_quiet_global in my sandbox but reading the thread makes me > think that simplification is needed and not an expansion. Since we already have a be_verbose_global variable, I can't imagine much serious objection to having a be_quiet_global. My initial guess would be that we want three different types of output: - verbose - normal - quiet However, this is definitely outside my depth. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
