On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Simon Tatham wrote:
>>> I went over to the gonville page, and I like the way it looks, and
>>> have to concur that we made Feta (perhaps overly) ornate.
>>>
>>> Just a small comment on the flags: I think gon
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010, Graham Percival wrote:
> Thanks for the report; added as as High-priority build problem:
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1028
>
> However, we have many other problems with the same (or even higher)
> priority. Don't hold your breath waiting for a fix. :(
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Simon Tatham wrote:
>> I went over to the gonville page, and I like the way it looks, and
>> have to concur that we made Feta (perhaps overly) ornate.
>>
>> Just a small comment on the flags: I think gonville could be improved
>> by making the final flag 16th (both
> "Graham" == Graham Percival writes:
Graham> the 2.12.0 and 2.13.13 tags, and add that to the "major
git diff -u -r release/2.12.0-1 -r release/2.13.13-1
Not sure what you want from the documentation.
--
Dr Peter Chubb peter DOT chubb AT nicta.com.au
http:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> I went over to the gonville page, and I like the way it looks, and
> have to concur that we made Feta (perhaps overly) ornate.
>
> Just a small comment on the flags: I think gonville could be improved
> by making the final flag 16th (both up and down) and higher note
>
[on a tangent]
I went over to the gonville page, and I like the way it looks, and
have to concur that we made Feta (perhaps overly) ornate.
Just a small comment on the flags: I think gonville could be improved
by making the final flag 16th (both up and down) and higher note
values slightly smalle
Could somebody figure out how to generate a git diff between the
2.12.0 and 2.13.13 tags, and add that to the "major release
checklist" in Documentation/contributor/release-work.itexi?
Line 266 would be a great location for this. Don't worry about
formatting; I'm treating that part of the CG as a
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> I'm not sure why the current default settings for \thumb were choosen as
> they are
Not sure either.
I've added it as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1029
Cheers,
Valentin
___
Thanks for the report; added as as High-priority build problem:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1028
However, we have many other problems with the same (or even higher)
priority. Don't hold your breath waiting for a fix. :(
Sorry,
- Graham
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Do
I'm not sure why the current default settings for \thumb were choosen as
they are, but if you want to modify it in your files, you can do
\version "2.12.1"
\layout{
\context{
\Score
scriptDefinitions = #(cons `("thumb" .
((script-stencil . (feta . ("thumb" . "thumb")))
(avoid-
James wrote:
[Gonville]
> The instructions to use this replacement for the feta font are simple (if
> rudimentary), but what I wanted to check is that as of 2.13.x there still is
> not a simple function along the lines of what is documented in the Notation
> Reference
>
> Such as #'(font.name.
Hello,
I hope this is the right list to ask this question on.
I am currently helping Graham with Doc edits and am looking at adding into
them somewhere the instructions for Windows/Mac OS and *NIX for the music font
Gonville (for those that don't know
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatha
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:52 AM, wrote:
> If I rewrite the example to get along without those modules, are there
> chances that the results will get accepted?
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/216066/show
I think that is an excellent idea. We may want to keep both examples
though, just to show
Hi,
I'm transcribing a score for cello which uses thumb fingering.
It seems that \thumb has a different "script-priority" (or maybe a
different "avoid-slur") value than other fingerings (Fingering object).
See the following example:
\relative c'' {
e2(-0 g) |
f2(-\thumb g)
}
The thu
The use of modules oop and goops appears to me as part of a programming
practice at a different knowledge level than to be expected from the
audience of this example.
If I rewrite the example to get along without those modules, are there
chances that the results will get accepted?
http://coderev
15 matches
Mail list logo
