On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:52 AM, <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > If I rewrite the example to get along without those modules, are there > chances that the results will get accepted? > > http://codereview.appspot.com/216066/show
I think that is an excellent idea. We may want to keep both examples though, just to show people how things work. In any event it would be interesting to see which of both is simpler and easier to follow. it is somewhat disappointing that the scheme examples weighs in at 190 lines of code, vs. 220 lines for the C++ version. Scheme engravers would be more convincing if they could drastically reduce the amount of code needed to write them. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
