On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Simon Tatham <ana...@pobox.com> wrote: >>> I went over to the gonville page, and I like the way it looks, and >>> have to concur that we made Feta (perhaps overly) ornate. >>> >>> Just a small comment on the flags: I think gonville could be improved >>> by making the final flag 16th (both up and down) and higher note >>> values slightly smaller. Since the last flag has no following flag to >>> counter balance it, it looks a bit out of proportion. >> >> Thank you for the comment! Yes, I think there was mild criticism of >> the flags when I initially mentioned Gonville on this list; I >> regrettably haven't got round to looking at them again, but I still >> mean to... >> >> Meanwhile, I've just had another go at making Lilypond (2.13.14) >> work with Gonville, with a view to updating the Gonville web page to >> supersede my current hacky installation instructions. I was able to >> get most of the musical glyphs to appear in Gonville, but I haven't >> worked out how to get the ASCII parts of the font - the time >> signature and dynamics letters - to switch over as seamlessly. >> >> I attach my test input files. 'test.ly' is the starting point, >> before I do anything to the font configuration; 'testg.ly' is > > [..] > > Let me try to see if I can hack up something that is less hacky.
If I am understanding correctly, the problem is that no workaround for loading Gonville was added to scm/font.scm (search for feta-alphabet-size-vector). I also added a tracker issue for this problem a few days ago: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1021 -Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
