Re: Line breaking, simple-spacer, etc.

2010-02-09 Thread Boris Shingarov
Quoting Joe Neeman : We create lots of extra grobs (eg. a BarNumber at every bar line) but most of them are not drawn. See the break-visibility property in item-interface. Thanks Joe, this explanation does help a lot. I hope I am not abusing your (and the list's) patience by asking another

Search box searches in 2.12

2010-02-09 Thread Francisco Vila
Hello. The google filter for our search box in the new webpage applies +2.12, shouldn't it be +2.13 instead? Searches on stable docs are great, but the new webpage currently hosts unstable. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com _

Re: Scheme engraver structure questions

2010-02-09 Thread Nicolas Sceaux
Le 9 févr. 2010 à 21:32, David Kastrup a écrit : > If you really must, you should probably use make-procedure-with-setter > in order to be able to use > > (define (engraver-method engraver 'initialize) ... According to:

Re: Scheme engraver structure questions

2010-02-09 Thread David Kastrup
Nicolas Sceaux writes: > Le 9 févr. 2010 à 14:42, David Kastrup a écrit : > >> I find that syntax tiresome to read. It requires evaluation and thus >> does not have a close correspondence to print syntax. >> >> That's partly because of the way the Scheme engraver example has been >> written. >>

Re: Scheme engraver structure questions

2010-02-09 Thread Nicolas Sceaux
Le 9 févr. 2010 à 14:42, David Kastrup a écrit : > I find that syntax tiresome to read. It requires evaluation and thus > does not have a close correspondence to print syntax. > > That's partly because of the way the Scheme engraver example has been > written. > > I'd much prefer it to use back

Re: Scheme engraver structure questions

2010-02-09 Thread David Kastrup
Eric Knapp writes: > I'm learning more Scheme. (I think I'll be learning Scheme for a > while.) I'm looking at the sample file scheme-engraver.ly and I have a > few questions. I think I'm understanding the structure of the Scheme, > it appears to be a list of Scheme pairs. Each pair (cons) has a

Re: more clef changes

2010-02-09 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Patrick Schmidt wrote: > Hi Graham, > > I moved the tab clef to fretted-strings and the percussion clef to percussion > for the following reasons: > > 1) (in a strict sense) they don't display pitches (1.1.3 Displaying pitches) That's a nice argument, but it does

Re: Patch: issue #659

2010-02-09 Thread Marc Hohl
Hi Alexander, Alexander Kobel schrieb: [...] I just noticed that the 'extra-offset won't influence the spacing of the notes before the bar line. The better property to tweak should be the right-edge extra space, but this does not work if the line ends prematurely. (See the attached exa

Re: problem with right-edge extra-space after \stopStaff

2010-02-09 Thread Marc Hohl
Neil Puttock schrieb: On 5 February 2010 08:38, Marc Hohl wrote: Any ideas/hints etc. are highly appreciated! If you have a spacer rest after \stopStaff, there's no right edge for the column which the segno's attached to (it's no longer the last column in the system). So \stopSta

Re: Patch: issue #659

2010-02-09 Thread Marc Hohl
Alexander Kobel schrieb: Marc Hohl wrote: Alexander Kobel schrieb: I don't really know if I saw the "||-before-break, S-after-break" combination, but I think it makes sense to offer it since coda parts are often seperated by double bar lines when the "default" segno sign is above them. I'll s