Nicolas Sceaux <nicolas.sce...@gmail.com> writes: > Le 9 févr. 2010 à 14:42, David Kastrup a écrit : > >> I find that syntax tiresome to read. It requires evaluation and thus >> does not have a close correspondence to print syntax. >> >> That's partly because of the way the Scheme engraver example has been >> written. >> >> I'd much prefer it to use backquote syntax, such as > > A real improvement would be to add syntax to define scheme engravers, > something like:
[...] I don't think that this helps understanding all too much: again the results are not what you'd get when trying to print the engraver. This asymmetry does not help. If you really must, you should probably use make-procedure-with-setter in order to be able to use (define (engraver-method engraver 'initialize) ... and retrieve it with (engraver-method ... again. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
