Re: [PATCH] define-grobs.scm: Alphabetize grob list. (was: Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?)

2009-06-29 Thread Mark Polesky
Mark Polesky wrote: > Okay, one thing at a time. > I'll patch the next one after this one gets applied. oops. Forgot to move the very last one in the list. This one's better. - Mark 0001-define-grobs.scm-Alphabetize-grob-list.patch Description: Binary data __

function renaming in "latest" texi2html

2009-06-29 Thread Graham Percival
Hi Reinhold, You recently committed d41b484a83c68e0f12800c3f073eb991af1e7946, which (apparently) stopped some breakage with the latext texi2html version. Is that for 1.82, or for a CVS version of texi2html? I'm wondering if I need to apply something similar to the web-gop texi2html init file. C

Re: type-check list in NR 6.1.1 (was: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?)

2009-06-29 Thread Carl D. Sorensen
On 6/29/09 7:08 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote: > > > Carl D. Sorensen wrote: >> Well it might require some serious hacking. But it ought to be possible to >> create a python script to do your regex search (and maybe even eliminate the >> duplicates). This could be stored as a .scm file that def

Re: New website: Logos

2009-06-29 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Francisco Vila wrote: > 2009/6/29 Graham Percival : >> IMO, this whole thing is bloody bollocks.  Let's stop wasting our >> time and simply remove every graphical logo from the website. > > I agree. It does not worth the headache. Why dont you just leave them, and

Re: [PATCH] LilyPond Mac GUI update and polish

2009-06-29 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 06:29:39PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 06:16:41PM -0700, Graham Percival wrote: > > Do you know if py2app can be run on debian? I couldn't find a > > package for it... I don't mind installing it manually, but if it > > depends on having an osx sd

Re: membership for the issue tracker

2009-06-29 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 03:28:44PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: > > Graham Percival wrote: > > - enhancement: something which requires new code. > > this is informative! Might as well cc this to CG 6.2 with a > heading like "TODO: clean this up." Well, there's a few other tags, and it needs to be

Re: [PATCH] LilyPond Mac GUI update and polish

2009-06-29 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 06:16:41PM -0700, Graham Percival wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:15:51PM +0200, Christian Hitz wrote: > > I have uploaded a patch to Rietveld: > > > > http://codereview.appspot.com/88076/show > > Thanks, committed! > > Do you know if py2app can be run on debian? I co

Re: [PATCH] LilyPond Mac GUI update and polish

2009-06-29 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:15:51PM +0200, Christian Hitz wrote: > I have uploaded a patch to Rietveld: > > http://codereview.appspot.com/88076/show Thanks, committed! Do you know if py2app can be run on debian? I couldn't find a package for it... I don't mind installing it manually, but if it de

Re: type-check list in NR 6.1.1 (was: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?)

2009-06-29 Thread Mark Polesky
Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > Well it might require some serious hacking. But it ought to be possible to > create a python script to do your regex search (and maybe even eliminate the > duplicates). This could be stored as a .scm file that defines a list of > ly:predicates. > > Then, there could be

Re: type-check list in NR 6.1.1 (was: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?)

2009-06-29 Thread Carl D. Sorensen
On 6/29/09 12:50 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote: > > > Neil Puttock wrote: >>> 1) I'd like to have all of type-p-name-alist listed in NR 6.1.1 >>> Overview of music functions (programming-interface.itely, line >>> 76). Any objections? >> >> None here, as long as you automate it (perhaps use a

[PATCH] define-grobs.scm: Alphabetize grob list. (was: Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?)

2009-06-29 Thread Mark Polesky
Neil Puttock wrote: > > 0) should I redo this? http://codereview.appspot.com/83042/show > > Yes please, at least to remove your comment concerning the duplication > (line 1613). > > You might as well leave the duplicated 'direction setting for the moment. Okay, one thing at a time. I'll patch t

Re: discrepancies in IR 4 "Scheme functions"

2009-06-29 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Mark Polesky wrote: >> >> 0) scheme-function "ly:in-event-class?" is define-public'd in >>   define-event-classes.scm but never called. Do we add it to >>   the list in IR 4 Scheme Functions or remove it alto

Re: discrepancies in IR 4 "Scheme functions"

2009-06-29 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Mark Polesky wrote: > > 0) scheme-function "ly:in-event-class?" is define-public'd in >   define-event-classes.scm but never called. Do we add it to >   the list in IR 4 Scheme Functions or remove it altogether? All of the IR 4 functions are auto-generated from C++

discrepancies in IR 4 "Scheme functions"

2009-06-29 Thread Mark Polesky
0) scheme-function "ly:in-event-class?" is define-public'd in define-event-classes.scm but never called. Do we add it to the list in IR 4 Scheme Functions or remove it altogether? 1) scheme-functions "dispatcher" and "listener" are in the list in IR 4 Scheme Functions, but should they be

Re: membership for the issue tracker

2009-06-29 Thread Mark Polesky
Graham Percival wrote: > - enhancement: something which requires new code. > > - accepted: default status once added (by a member) > - fixed: programmer thinks it's resolved > - verified: Bug Meister checks the results in an official binary > and agrees it's resolved > > - priority-high: lilyp

Re: membership for the issue tracker

2009-06-29 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 03:11:09PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: > > Are the exact criteria for labeling posted somewhere? CG 6.2 Issue classification. ... ok, it's a blank section right now, but the location of the *eventual* posting is obvious. :) (once you accept that the CG is your Lord and Ma

Re: membership for the issue tracker

2009-06-29 Thread Mark Polesky
Patrick McCarty wrote: > > IMO, everybody who's semi-seriously (or more) involved in lilypond > > development should be registered there; it would be annoying if > > you fixed some bug, but couldn't register the fix. > > I agree. Are the exact criteria for labeling posted somewhere? I seem to r

Re: membership for the issue tracker

2009-06-29 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 02:31:26PM -0700, Graham Percival wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 04:41:22PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: > > Can you make me a project member on the bug tracker? It will save > > time and hassle if I can do the tagging myself once I've ported each > > bugfix. > > Certainly

Re: membership for the issue tracker

2009-06-29 Thread Francisco Vila
2009/6/29 Graham Percival : > Does anybody else want to be a member for our google issue > tracker?  This lets you add labels (such as "fixed_2_12_x") and > stuff.  You need a google account to do this. For me is enough to be able to make comments (what I currently am). Translation does not benefi

Re: New website: Logos

2009-06-29 Thread Francisco Vila
2009/6/29 Graham Percival : > IMO, this whole thing is bloody bollocks.  Let's stop wasting our > time and simply remove every graphical logo from the website. I agree. It does not worth the headache. > (... ok, I suppose we *could* have a column-center-bottom area at > the bottom of the Download

membership for the issue tracker

2009-06-29 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 04:41:22PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: > Can you make me a project member on the bug tracker? It will save > time and hassle if I can do the tagging myself once I've ported each > bugfix. Certainly! That should been done ages ago. Does anybody else want to be a member for

Re: New website: Logos

2009-06-29 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 04:54:05PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote: > With regarding to the use of logos in the downolad pages, and > specifically about the Linux Tux logo, it can be freely used but the > author Larry Ewing is to be acknowledged. Thanks for looking into all this. I must admit that I

type-check list in NR 6.1.1 (was: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?)

2009-06-29 Thread Mark Polesky
Neil Puttock wrote: > > 1) I'd like to have all of type-p-name-alist listed in NR 6.1.1 > > Overview of music functions (programming-interface.itely, line > > 76). Any objections? > > None here, as long as you automate it (perhaps use a markup command to > extract and prettify the list entrie

Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?

2009-06-29 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/6/28 Mark Polesky : > two questions: > > 0) should I redo this? http://codereview.appspot.com/83042/show Yes please, at least to remove your comment concerning the duplication (line 1613). You might as well leave the duplicated 'direction setting for the moment. > 1) I'd like to have all

Re: [PATCH] Docs: NR 1.2.1 Durations: add 128th notes to examples.

2009-06-29 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/6/28 Mark Polesky : > Please apply. Thanks, applied. Regards, Neil ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: GUB / autoconf out-of-tree builds

2009-06-29 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/6/24 Graham Percival : > If you're willing, then great!  With 2.14 being delayed by another > month, it probably *is* a good idea to get another 2.12 release > out there that includes more than gcc-4.4 fixes. Ok, I'll start work on it in a few days' time once I've tidied up the loose ends wi

Re: New website: Logos

2009-06-29 Thread Francisco Vila
>From Apple legal, but not specifically for the X (from Mac Os X) logo, and if the webpage is a 'publication', we have this: When using the marks in publications that will be distributed only in the United States, include the appropriate TM, SM, or ® symbol on first use. For publications that

Re: New website: Logos

2009-06-29 Thread Francisco Vila
Windows logos are not free and they are problematic. These are in commons and can be used: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Microsoft_Windows_logos The official logo is used in German wikipedia with a warning, but I don't read German: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Logo_Microsoft_W

New website: Logos

2009-06-29 Thread Francisco Vila
With regarding to the use of logos in the downolad pages, and specifically about the Linux Tux logo, it can be freely used but the author Larry Ewing is to be acknowledged. Permission to use and/or modify this image is granted provided you acknowledge me lew...@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP if som

Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine

2009-06-29 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Montag, 22. Juni 2009 15:31:14 schrieb Joe Neeman: > A quick update on the new vertical spacing: the version now in dev/jneeman > has most of the features that I had planned Wow, I just tried it out for the first time, and I must say I'm impressed, Finally the scores look like professional fu