I reckon it'd be better to split the whole thing into three entries.
Whether an instrument transposes or not has nothing to do with concert pitch.
Here's my rough try at the three entries:
Concert Pitch:
Notes like a, b, c etc., describe a relationship between themselves,
not an absolute pitch.
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 08:48:15PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> Patrick,
>
> I applied this patch. I actually had to redo it, because I changed
> define-grobs.scm first, so the patch wouldn't apply. But it's
> applied now, along with the changes to lily/beam.cc and
> scm/define-grob-interfac
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 06:11:32PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> I'm going to step in here, perhaps where wise men fear to tread.
>
> The LilyPond music glossary isn't intended to be a definitive music
> dictionary, is it?
Nope, not at all.
> So do we care what reference concert pitch uses?
Patrick,
I applied this patch. I actually had to redo it, because I changed
define-grobs.scm first, so the patch wouldn't apply. But it's applied now,
along with the changes to lily/beam.cc and scm/define-grob-interfaces.scm so
that details works as desired for beams.
Thanks for your help in ge
On 4/6/09 6:41 PM, "Paul Scott" wrote:
> Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>> So do we care what reference concert pitch uses? Does it matter if it's
>> A=440, or A=445, or A=450?
>>
>
> Some of us care for a non-notational reason: Woodwinds are built to
> specific proportions which make them much
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
I'm going to step in here, perhaps where wise men fear to tread.
The LilyPond music glossary isn't intended to be a definitive music
dictionary, is it?
Nope. A basic understanding of transposition should be all that is
important here.
So do we care what reference
I'm going to step in here, perhaps where wise men fear to tread.
The LilyPond music glossary isn't intended to be a definitive music
dictionary, is it?
So do we care what reference concert pitch uses? Does it matter if it's
A=440, or A=445, or A=450?
Aren't the key issues that:
1) Concert pit
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> I've been working on fixing the documentation of details for beaming.
>
> One of the parameters in details is inter-quant-penalty.
>
> However, this property is only read in lily/beam-quanting.cc; it is never
> used.
>
> Further, a git grep
I've been working on fixing the documentation of details for beaming.
One of the parameters in details is inter-quant-penalty.
However, this property is only read in lily/beam-quanting.cc; it is never
used.
Further, a git grep for inter-quant-penalty returns only the single
reference in lily/bea
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009, "Anthony W. Youngman"
said:
> Sounds good.
one down? !!!
> I think it's your use of "informally adopted" that jars - it implies
> that they've ignored the Standard, when the standard didn't even exist
> at the time.
didnt have any one particular standard in mind; when o
In message ,
dem...@suffolk.lib.ny.us writes
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009, "Anthony W. Youngman"
said:
Okay, we've got more feedback (isn't this fun :-).
welcome to electronic commiteedom :-)
1.64 Concert pitch
The convention (standardised by ISO 16) that A above middle C represents
the note at 44
On 4/6/09 12:44 PM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 07:46:41AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>>
>> So the new assignment, then, is to modify the *.cc file for each
>> object that has a details property so that the elements of the
>> details are included. I haven't rev
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009, "Anthony W. Youngman"
said:
> Okay, we've got more feedback (isn't this fun :-).
welcome to electronic commiteedom :-)
> 1.64 Concert pitch
>
> The convention (standardised by ISO 16) that A above middle C represents
> the note at 440 Hertz. This is commonly notated by t
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 07:46:41AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 4/6/09 7:10 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote:
> >
> > What do you mean? The way it's done for the Stem related
> > subproperties is that the documentation is included together with
> > the other stem-interface documentation at the
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
The way it's done for the Stem related subproperties
is that the documentation is included together with the other
stem-interface documentation at the end of the file lily/stem.cc. ...
Ahh -OK. I had missed the description at the top, and had just noticed that
On 4/6/09 7:10 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote:
>>> Thanks Mats, I did not think of doing that.
>>>
>>> This will be a task in itself. For example, Tie has 26 different
>>> subproperties of 'details to document!
>>>
>>>
>>
>> This documentation *has* to be automatically generated.
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 4/6/09 3:48 AM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 09:37:09AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Patrick McCarty wrote:
So, is the patch okay as it is?
Don't refer to *.cc files for more information on the subproperties in
deta
On 4/6/09 3:48 AM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 09:37:09AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>>
>>
>> Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>>
>>> So, is the patch okay as it is?
>>>
>> Don't refer to *.cc files for more information on the subproperties in
>> details. These are (or at
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 09:37:09AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>
>
> Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>
>> So, is the patch okay as it is?
>>
> Don't refer to *.cc files for more information on the subproperties in
> details. These are (or at least should be) described in the
> corresponding *-inter
Carl
I would have liked to tackle this, but I think it is beyond my
skills at the moment. Changes will be needed to C++ code to
implement the new beam sub-dividing at least, and I have no means of
compiling LilyPond for testing.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Carl D. Sorensen
On 6 Apr 2009, at 00:11, Hans Aberg wrote:
Depending on the design of the instrument, some instruments have a
lowest (pedal) note whose wavelength is twice the length of the
instrument and can play all harmonics thereof (1/2, 2/2, 3/2...),
while others have a pedal note whose wavelength is fo
Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 01:53:43PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 4/3/09 1:43 PM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
Unfortunately, there are different 'details lists for different grobs,
so there's n
22 matches
Mail list logo
