Re: contributor/user split in docs

On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 01:22:47AM +0100, John Mandereau wrote: > Le vendredi 02 janvier 2009 à 18:52 -0800, Graham Percival a écrit : > > I'll have the pdf on my > > website for GOP, and after the first few weeks, this document > > shouldn't be changing much, so the normal stable release will be >

Re: Frog mailing list

Discussion isn't on -devel, and won't be on -devel. That's my experience with GDP; it takes months for people ot feel comfortable posting here. I might even argue that discussion *shouldn't* take place on -devel, but since I'm leaving in less than 12 hours, this isn't the time to start it. :)

Moving communication to lilypond-devel@gnu.org

Dear Frogs, I spoke with Han-Wen about the possibility of creating a lilypond-frogs mailing list to carry frog communication. Instead, he requested that we have the frog communication on lilypond-devel. Please sign up for the lilypond-devel mailing list at

Re: bugfix patch reviewing

On 1/4/09 3:46 PM, "Han-Wen Nienhuys" wrote: > Changes which look innocuous can cause problems in other areas. I'd > like to request that the frogmeister be responsible for running each > change through the regression test, ie. > > git checkout pristine > make test-baseline > git-apply-

Re: Mensural style

On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Trevor Daniels wrote: BTW, the term "accidental style" appears twice in the documentation with a completely different meaning: - in 1.1.3, meaning the way how to display and reset accidentals In the detailed explanation they are named "rules" so I propose to always call t

Re: Frog mailing list

Let's keep the traffic on devel for now - when it gets too much, we can always create the list later. On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > What would it take create a lilypond-frog mailing list at savannah? I > apparently don't have the rights to do so, but I think it might

Re: Updates to fret-diagrams

I agree with joe that there is a lot of duplicate here; it must be possible to rewrite this more tightly. That said, the fret-diagram code is completely your domain, so it's your call. http://codereview.appspot.com/11857/diff/1/4 File scm/fret-diagrams.scm (right): http://codereview.appspot.co

Re: Keep git-update-changelog.py?

Please junk On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:31 AM, John Mandereau wrote: > Do we want to keep buildscripts/git-update-changelog.py? > > This script was designed to update Savannah CVS with changes made in > git.or.cz Git repository during the transition between the two revision > systems. We no longer

Re: 2.12.1 out; announcements and normal stable

On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Graham Percival wrote: >> > The text announcement to info-lilypond should be already out, and >> > should appear in the archives soon: >> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-lilypond/ >> >> It hasn't: you might want to ask Han-Wen to add the posting permission

Re: bugfix patch reviewing

Changes which look innocuous can cause problems in other areas. I'd like to request that the frogmeister be responsible for running each change through the regression test, ie. git checkout pristine make test-baseline git-apply-patch bugfix make check For the rest, the patches should be r

Frog mailing list

What would it take create a lilypond-frog mailing list at savannah? I apparently don't have the rights to do so, but I think it might be useful to separate frog traffic from devel. What do you think? Thanks, Carl ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lil

Re: Mensural style

Francisco Vila wrote Monday, December 29, 2008 10:49 AM 2008/12/29 Stefan Waler : BTW, the term "accidental style" appears twice in the documentation with a completely different meaning: - in 1.1.3, meaning the way how to display and reset accidentals In the detailed explanation they are n

Re: About Learning Manual

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Sonntag, 4. Januar 2009 15:08:48 schrieb Sawada, Yoshiki: > I am using Ubuntu 8.10. Me too. > I found texi2html ver. 1.78 by "sudo apt-get install texi2html", but I > do not know how to install texi2html ver. 1.79 into Ubuntu. texi2html 1.80 has

Re: About Learning Manual

On 2009/01/04 14:08 +, Sawada, Yoshiki wrote: > Yes, it is my hope to provide LilyPond community with my translation. > I am not a professional for music or translation, so my Japanese > document is not so good. But I hope someone will brush it up. You may want to contact Yoshinobu Ishizaki w

Missing 128th note flags in 2.12.1

Hi everybody, Though Max's patch for 128th note flags precedes 2.12.1, it's missing from the docs, both on lilypond.org and kainhofer.com (the news entry just shows a long stem). I've just downloaded 2.12.1 on XP and it's clear that the fonts are out of date, since lilypond complains: warning: f

Re: About Learning Manual

Hello, John, Carl and everyone. Thank you for your replys. > Stencils have an x-extent and a y-extent. Each extent is a pair, > listingthe lowest coordinate and the highest coordinate. > > So imagine that there is a rectangle that goes from (-1,-2) to (3,4). > This would have an x-extent of (-

Re: LM master?

Graham Percival wrote Sunday, January 04, 2009 10:10 AM On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 10:00:58AM -, Trevor Daniels wrote: Graham, you wrote Saturday, January 03, 2009 11:19 PM Oh, one idea: since the templates are available in the Snippet List, and since we assume that users have all pdfs (an

Re: gub3 LDFLAGS error

Op donderdag 01-01-2009 om 13:46 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Graham Percival: > Yes, but I see that there's still some LD_LIBRARY_PATH in > gub/tools.py from the online git version -- lines 31 and 69. Removing this works for a clean build of mingw:: and linux-64::lilypond on linux-64, so I've p

Re: SCons support in LilyPond

Op zaterdag 03-01-2009 om 11:58 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Graham Percival: > I had great success converting another project to cmake last Aug, > but this isn't anything I'd attempt with my current situation. I > might propose it for 2.15 or 2.17 (next fall or sometime next > year), though. H

Re: SCons support in LilyPond

Op zondag 04-01-2009 om 00:39 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef John Mandereau: > I'm afraid it is too late to resurrect SCons, or too early if you > prefer. Yes, quite possibly. SCons has been the new great promising end all solution for Make for a few years too many, maybe. Having said that, past