Texi2html: Change text of [To Documentation Overview] link

Reviewers: Reinhold, Message: I would recommend making the small change that's explained in the comment. Thanks, Patrick http://codereview.appspot.com/11851/diff/1/2 File lilypond-texi2html.init (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/11851/diff/1/2#newcode669 Line 669: print $fh "[...] Other

new info for releases (was: 2.12 out - what now?)

On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 02:49:46AM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 24. Dezember 2008 19:34:04 schrieb Graham Percival: > > There seems to be some confusion about what happens next. Here's > > the plan. > > Can I commit the keySignature reverse alist patch, which should add a conve

Re: 2.12 out - what now?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Mittwoch, 24. Dezember 2008 19:34:04 schrieb Graham Percival: > There seems to be some confusion about what happens next. Here's > the plan. > > Very short-term (1-2 days): > - John updates webpage to have 2.12 links, news item, etc. > - I send ann

Re: Are tick barlines too thin?

Reinhold Kainhofer kainhofer.com> writes: > > > Am Mittwoch, 24. Dezember 2008 22:13:57 schrieb Trevor Daniels: > > Neil Puttock wrote Wednesday, December 24, 2008 3:36 PM > > > > > Should tick barlines be the same thickness as nornal barlines? > > > Currently they get their width from line-thi

Re: 2.12 uploaded

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Mittwoch, 24. Dezember 2008 14:39:46 schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer: > For example, I have two local patches, which I think > should go in 2.12. One of them is the renaming of the "<< Back to documentation index" link in the docs. Here's the patch: h

Re: 2.12 uploaded

On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 04:30:02PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote: > Le mercredi 24 d??cembre 2008 ?? 15:17 +0100, John Mandereau a ??crit : > > Le mercredi 24 d??cembre 2008 ?? 01:47 -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys a ??crit : > > > Note that I also did not update the website accordingly, so you'll > > > need

Re: Are tick barlines too thin?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Mittwoch, 24. Dezember 2008 22:13:57 schrieb Trevor Daniels: > Neil Puttock wrote Wednesday, December 24, 2008 3:36 PM > > > Should tick barlines be the same thickness as nornal barlines? > > Currently they get their width from line-thickness which

Re: 2.12 out - what now?

Le mercredi 24 décembre 2008 à 10:34 -0800, Graham Percival a écrit : > There seems to be some confusion about what happens next. Indeed. FWIW Fedora 10 which was out one month ago provides release 2.11.57. > Very short-term (1-2 days): > - John updates webpage to have 2.12 links, news item, et

Re: Are tick barlines too thin?

Neil Puttock wrote Wednesday, December 24, 2008 3:36 PM Should tick barlines be the same thickness as nornal barlines? Currently they get their width from line-thickness which makes them slightly lighter; it also makes it impossible to tweak their appearance without altering the look of the who

2.12 out - what now?

There seems to be some confusion about what happens next. Here's the plan. Very short-term (1-2 days): - John updates webpage to have 2.12 links, news item, etc. - I send announcement to -user. Short-term (1 week at most, but start this stuff now as well): - people commit any "last-minute" stuff

Re: 2.12 uploaded

[Reinhold] > For such a big release it would have been nice to have a fixed date beforehand so that one can make sure that everything that is supposed to be in there is really in. For example, I have two local patches, which I think should go in 2.12. [Valentin] > I hope (and believe) everything w

Are tick barlines too thin?

Hi everybody, Should tick barlines be the same thickness as nornal barlines? Currently they get their width from line-thickness which makes them slightly lighter; it also makes it impossible to tweak their appearance without altering the look of the whole stave. Regards, Neil __

Re: 2.12 uploaded

Le mercredi 24 décembre 2008 à 15:17 +0100, John Mandereau a écrit : > Le mercredi 24 décembre 2008 à 01:47 -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys a écrit : > > Note that I also did not update the website accordingly, so you'll > > need to update the download page too. > > I'm doing this. Ugh, http://lilypond.o

Re: [patch] new convert-ly rule for 2.12

2008/12/24 Graham Percival : > Whoever is up-to-date on convert-ly (I'm not), please review and > apply. Thanks, Graham. I've simplified it a bit (the FROM_TO section isn't required). Once I've run a clean build, I'll commit it together with a version bump for .ly files. Cheers, Neil

Re: 2.12 uploaded

2008/12/24 Reinhold Kainhofer : > I would have preferred an internal announcement a week ago or so, that 2.12 > will be branched on this or that day and that everyone should make sure that > what he thinks should be in 2.12 is committed by then. Yeah, but then we'd have missed the "Christmas time

Re: 2.12 uploaded

Le mercredi 24 décembre 2008 à 01:47 -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys a écrit : > Note that I also did not update the website accordingly, so you'll > need to update the download page too. I'm doing this. Best, John ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-de

Re: 2.12 uploaded

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Mittwoch, 24. Dezember 2008 03:27:33 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys: > I have just cut a 2.12.0 release, uploaded it to lilypond.org, and > switched over the redirects to v2.12. Great to hear! Did you build it with gub? I'm asking, because my gub builds

Re: Tunable vs. internal properties

2008/12/23 Patrick McCarty : > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:18:04PM +, Neil Puttock wrote: >> 2008/12/22 Patrick McCarty : >> >> > BTW, I think I these properties need to be moved from "internal >> > backend" to "user backend": >> > >> > - circled-tip >> > - padding-pairs >> > - skyline-horizonta

Re: Convert-ly rules

Hi Max, 2008/12/22 Maximilian Albert : > 2008/12/22 Maximilian Albert : >> Should convert-ly rules be formulated so that Scheme-version >> of commands like the above are also taken into account? > > Never mind, I just saw that the rule for \center-align already has > this. So here is a patch for \