-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am Mittwoch, 24. Dezember 2008 22:13:57 schrieb Trevor Daniels: > Neil Puttock wrote Wednesday, December 24, 2008 3:36 PM > > > Should tick barlines be the same thickness as nornal barlines? > > Currently they get their width from line-thickness which makes them > > slightly lighter; it also makes it impossible to tweak their > > appearance without altering the look of the whole stave. > > Definitely. We don't want different overrides for the different styles > of barline.
I first tried using the barline width for the tick, but then the ticks looked strange and unlike the ticked barlines that I have seen in e.g. transcribed psalms. since in those scores the tick appeared to be the same width as the staff lines, I decided to use that width instead of the barline width... Cheers, Reinhold - -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------ Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJUspATqjEwhXvPN0RApNyAJ9bYqa0dgaFOj62vU7gBm8t8vlbvgCeN81V R+IDowcuy8KT64evevf6Sho= =8QfZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
