On Tuesday 21 November 2006 16:31, Joe Neeman wrote:
> On 11/21/06, Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My main concern with pure max-slope is that it may not produce good
> > results
> > near tower-roofs. E.g., max-slope = 2 means that (min horizontal
> > distance) is
> > 0.5 * (min verti
John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The mailing list allows the translation to be done in team, just like
> the French translators always have done. It's slower than working alone,
> but results in much more quality.
Ok, so I'd say: go for that.
> Do you mean we must not translate the s
Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm guessing the developers will soon be bending their thoughts
> towards version 2.11, and I'm looking forward to trying it out!
>
> I'm wondering if it will be possible to modify the GUB somehow so the
> development branch and the stable branch can coe
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 21:01, Joe Neeman wrote:
> Bah, my attachments were to big. Trying again...
>
> On 11/15/06, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The jneeman git branch now has 2 new features: max-sloped skylines
> > (currently hard-coded at slope 2) and skyline debugging. I've a
John Mandereau wrote:
> Besides that, I hope I don't have to download the entire git history to
> track the `fr-doc' branch. I'm sure there is an easy way to tell git to
> push to/pull from 'fr-doc' instead of 'stable/2.10', but I'm relatively
> new to it... I'm going to investigate it.
That was j
On 11/20/06, Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I just got another idea of how to improve max-slope skylines. The
motivation
is mathematical rather than scientific, so there's no guarantee it's a
good
idea. But anyways:
The problem that max-slope tries to solve, is to separate object
Of course, the most crucial thing is that these programs don't
run at all for the moment (for the same reason).
/Mats
Quoting Bertalan Fodor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
I'm wondering if it is intentional that lilypond-book.py became
lilypond-book and convert-ly.py became convert-ly in the
John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thank you for bearing with my patch. After that, what do you think the
> most efficient plan is? Should I keep working on the
> makefiles/buildscripts even if you have to polish my work, or should I
> simply restart the translation work on the lilypond-
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Thank you for bearing with my patch. After that, what do you think the
> > most efficient plan is? Should I keep working on the
> > makefiles/buildscripts even if you have to polish my work, or should I
> > simply restart
John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's (finally) my first patch against stable/2.10 git head for the
> documentation build infrastructure.
I've included the patch verbatim and pushed it as the `fr-doc' branch,
and I'm building it right now.
> - French translation of the tutorial, wh
Hello,
I'm wondering if it is intentional that lilypond-book.py became
lilypond-book and convert-ly.py became convert-ly in the Windows version
of 10.0-2. This is important for me, because for running these commands
from LilyPondTool I should know this information. Because if I change
the cod
11 matches
Mail list logo
