Feta Font - G Clef

2004-11-28 Thread J L
Hi, Did LilyPond use to use the G Clef found on the About page of www.lilypond.org? If so, is it possible to have it reinstated in future LilyPond versions under anoter name? I would quite like to use that from time to time. Aligorith

Re: question about a <> mark similar to a c-> notation...

2004-11-28 Thread Arno Waschk
Hi Han-Wen, hm, i am not sure whether i understood correctly what you mean/want, but for me it looks now very similar to the original ">" sign already being in that feta... Hope it helps... Arno On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 12:20:44 +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: guile-gnome

2004-11-28 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Sunday 04 July 2004 17.20, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Pedro Kroger writes: > > Now it seems to be 'working' (i.e. found the modules), but I got > > > > /home/kroger/lilypond/install//share/lilypond/2.3.5/scm/framework-gnome.s > >cm:129:5: While evaluating arguments to map in expression (map > >

new markup remark.

2004-11-28 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
I wouldn't mind of demanding that users write \line explicitly inside \column to go to horizontal mode again, ie. \markup { \column { a b \bold { c d } e f } => \markup { \column { a b \bold c \bold d e f } } I think this is more consistent. Of course, \markup should implicitly enclose

RE: FYI: encoding issues

2004-11-28 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > If not, what is the motivation for continuing to invest time into both > > TeX and PostScript backends? > > Practically: TeX has more formatting capabilities. Personally, I want > to minimize the amount of time I si

Re: LilyPond 2.5: isinf macro/function/template

2004-11-28 Thread Andreas Scherer
On Sunday 28 November 2004 16:25, Christian Hitz wrote: > I got lilypond 2.5.2 to compile by doing the following things: > > - set _GLIBCPP_USE_C99 before #include in the files that use > isinf/isnan > - replace each occurrence of isinf/isnan with std::isinf/std::isnan > > I don't know if this bre

Re: markups: s/<>/{}/

2004-11-28 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Ok, I think I got it. This is not very straightforward. > no, that's why we need a guru like you to do it :-) > > > make web runs OK, except in input/regression where it fails on > ancient-fonts.ly -- I guess this is not related. ancient-font also fails over here.

Re: markups: s/<>/{}/

2004-11-28 Thread Nicolas Sceaux
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> There is one thing I have not done yet: adding a rule in convert-ly. > > I'm not sure that it will be feasible to add convert-ly rules, since > you have to deal with correctly nesting { } I've added a rule that should c

Re: FYI: encoding issues

2004-11-28 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> > IMHO it should be included too. We have plenty of space available... > > Hmmm. We should expand the size of a single brace subfont, > otherwise, we need too many feta-braces-[a-z]-[0-9]*.mf files. Well, it has to look fine :-) > Hmm. I tried to google for sfnt, but without avail. Is SFNT ju

Re: FYI: encoding issues

2004-11-28 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Some minor clarifications and additions. > > > - dynamics, numbers, modern notes, ancient notes should be merged > > into an OpenType font. > > > > [What about the brace font?] > > IMHO it should be included too. We have plenty of space available... Hmmm. We

Re: brace mismatch in init.ly

2004-11-28 Thread Nicolas Sceaux
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> >> Ah.. I didn't think this was allowed (or at least not recommended). Using >> \include at anything else than top level is a kind of substitute for macros, >> and macros is something we don't want.. > > I guess that cr

Re: brace mismatch in init.ly

2004-11-28 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Ah.. I didn't think this was allowed (or at least not recommended). Using > \include at anything else than top level is a kind of substitute for macros, > and macros is something we don't want.. I guess that creating macros with \include is sufficiently painful to

request for command similar to \fatText

2004-11-28 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Consider the following situation: > > Allegro molto >staff 1 |... | . | > >staff 2 |... > > It happens quite often that text strings like `Allegro molto' stick > out to the right. Can you pr

RE: FYI: encoding issues

2004-11-28 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > [...] > > * good support for non-western lyrics, > > > > * usable PostScript output > > > > * better support for TeX's text formatting features. > > > > * A cleaner system for reading and processing fonts. > > Please don't answer the following questions if yo

RE: FYI: encoding issues

2004-11-28 Thread Mark Van den Borre
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > As you might know, the support for languages that use non-ASCII glyphs > (both european characters with accents and non-european characters) is > flaky: choices for glyphs are dependent on the -rather limited- TeX EC > font of the. The problem of

Re: question about a <> mark similar to a c-> notation...

2004-11-28 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Okay, i hope the second attempt includes your suggestions... Better, but the anti-blobbing at the junction is still not perfect. The outside outline should be a straight line ; check what happens with > if you change its value for diminish to 1.0 -- Han-Wen Nienhuy

LilyPond 2.5: isinf macro/function/template

2004-11-28 Thread Andreas Scherer
Hello list, I have tried to analyze the "isinf issue", resulting from my "#include cleanup" patch for LilyPond 2.5, and want to submit the following results, created with gcc/g++/libc/libstdc++ 3.3.4 on SuSE Linux 9.2. If you look at the LilyPond C++ sources you find that the issue with "isinf"

Chordname printing looks strange in 2.2.5

2004-11-28 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hi, > > As a maintainer of the Mutopia site I volunteered to convert old lilypond > files to later versions (currently I am converting to version 2.2.5 on > cygwin). Lately I ran into aproblem that you can perhaps help me with. > Mutopia's TownerDB's 'Trust and Obey' co

Re: question about a <> mark similar to a c-> notation...

2004-11-28 Thread Arno Waschk
Okay, i hope the second attempt includes your suggestions... On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 00:07:28 +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > If I understand you correctly, you want to add a new articulation script > (rather than patching the code for dynamic marks).

Re: FYI: encoding issues

2004-11-28 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Some minor clarifications and additions. > - dynamics, numbers, modern notes, ancient notes should be merged > into an OpenType font. > > [What about the brace font?] IMHO it should be included too. We have plenty of space available... > - font parameters (staff-space, line thickness,