[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Ah.. I didn't think this was allowed (or at least not recommended). Using > \include at anything else than top level is a kind of substitute for macros, > and macros is something we don't want..
I guess that creating macros with \include is sufficiently painful to deter people from actually doing it. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
