some cases they are even more permissive than AGPL.
So, just sharing.
Thanks!
Ofer
On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 03:45, David Woolley
wrote:
> On 09/08/2019 15:57, Gil Yehuda via License-discuss wrote:
> > Depending on what you mean "dual,"
>
> Dual in the context of open s
Related question -
Can I release the software under a dual license: AGPL and my modified
Apache?
Assuming my modified Apache is not open source by OSI, would the code still
be open source by OSI because it's also licensed under AGPL?
If so, then we end up with either:
* Disclose any modifications
* Support amount (can be 0)
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 00:01, Russell McOrmond
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019, 11:44 Ofer wrote:
>
>> Let me clarify, I don't determine that, you do :-)
>> You use the code, you "Make sure your use of the software complies with
>&
t $12 a year to
> charity as our way to perform Da'ana... We encourage users of our source
> code to do the same and make the world a better place." That can't hurt,
> it's a declaration, not a condition of use. Licenses are not inspirational
> texts.
>
> Gil
r the above 2 sections in the
Apache license:
https://github.com/wakkaworks/wakka/blob/master/LICENSE#L180-L191
I'd love to know what you think of the whole thing.
Thanks,
Ofer Bartal
CEO@WakkaWorks
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@
