Thanks for the feedback everyone. What if I drop the ethics part and drop the 1$ support minimum? The license will only require that users of the code will add themselves to a file in the repo with the following fields: * Company/individual name * Description of how the software is used * Support amount (can be 0)
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 00:01, Russell McOrmond <russellmcorm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019, 11:44 Ofer <blueo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Let me clarify, I don't determine that, you do :-) >> You use the code, you "Make sure your use of the software complies with >> your own ethical standards", and you decide on the support $ amount. >> > > You appear to have confused readme.txt and license.txt . There is nothing > that disallows a request for donations to be included in a software > distribution, but the OSD disallows demanding royalties or restricting > fields of use. > > > Ethics is so subjective, that it is hard for it to have any meaning in a > legal context. Things which aren't about the law and enforceability under > the law have no place in license.txt, and only generate confusion. > > > _______________________________________________ > License-discuss mailing list > License-discuss@lists.opensource.org > > http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org >
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
