Hi everyone, Thanks for the discussion. Another quick update - I found out these non-open source licenses which on the other hand are not completely closed: https://commonsclause.com https://polyformproject.org
We're also considering them. Even though they're not open source by OSI, in some cases they are even more permissive than AGPL. So, just sharing. Thanks! Ofer On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 03:45, David Woolley <for...@david-woolley.me.uk> wrote: > On 09/08/2019 15:57, Gil Yehuda via License-discuss wrote: > > Depending on what you mean "dual," > > Dual in the context of open source software generally means that you > licence it under two alternative sets of terms and the licensee can > chose which of those sets of terms to honour. Typically they would be > GPL and a non-GPL compatible licence, but one of the sets of terms could > be non-open source. > > They would normally be able to choose the terms differently for each > copy they make. > > _______________________________________________ > License-discuss mailing list > License-discuss@lists.opensource.org > > http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org >
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
