RE: Absolute paths generated by libtool.

2006-11-15 Thread Duft Markus
We could talk about it if you would be able to talk like a grown up... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Dessent Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 8:17 AM To: libtool@gnu.org Subject: Re: Absolute paths generated by libtool. Duft Mar

Re: Absolute paths generated by libtool.

2006-11-15 Thread Benoit Sigoure
Quoting Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: * Benoit Sigoure wrote on Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 07:55:38AM CET: Quoting Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >* Benoit Sigoure wrote on Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 07:27:13AM CET: > >>If simply passing -mno-cygwin to gcc is exactly like using mingw gcc, > >N

Re: Absolute paths generated by libtool.

2006-11-15 Thread Bob Rossi
> cross-compiling them from cygwin. Or consider making your project depend > on cygwin in the first place; since cygwin tends to be the more POSIX-like > environment, the port from Unix to cygwin is easier. Watch out. I _think_ if you do this it'll force your project to be licensed under the GPL.

Re: Absolute paths generated by libtool.

2006-11-15 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Bob Rossi on 11/15/2006 6:51 AM: >> cross-compiling them from cygwin. Or consider making your project depend >> on cygwin in the first place; since cygwin tends to be the more POSIX-like >> environment, the port from Unix to cygwin is eas