Quoting Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
* Benoit Sigoure wrote on Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 07:55:38AM CET:
Quoting Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>* Benoit Sigoure wrote on Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 07:27:13AM CET:
>
>>If simply passing -mno-cygwin to gcc is exactly like using mingw gcc,
>
>No, e.g., for path handling reasons already stated, this is already
>wrong.
Don't be picky :P
Well, it will hit you time and again if you don't listen.
Usually shortly before a deadline.
Yes you're totally right but besides this difference, are there other
differences I need to be aware of?
>Also note that techincally you're cross-compiling, so you need
>--host, and will encounter some more fun.
Yeah well, it's not like if I was to compile Windows binaries on Linux, I
can still run what I compile etc (important for make check).
Passing --host is necessary in general.
Alright I'll pass --host=mingw32.
Hmm I think this means "no, libtool doesn't work with vc++" :)
No, it meant: do what I wrote and then libtool will work reasonably well
with MSVC.
OK.
Does any of you people know about cccl [http://cccl.sourceforge.net/]?
Yes. It's helpful already for some things Autoconf assumes.
Nice. I'll try it out.
--
SIGOURE Benoit aka Tsuna
_____
/EPITA\ Promo 2008, LRDE
_______________________________________________
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
