[Libreoffice] Disputed bug requires developer ruling

2011-09-18 Thread Jonathan
I need to call bug 40893 to the attention of somebody in a position to rule on it. It has been closed inappropriately by a non dev without a second opinion or review by a developer. The bug has been reproduced and has documentation in the user interface, so triage should now be complete and it

Re: Internal Updater

2014-07-21 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
te a few times as something that we feel need some >> love/attention. >> >> >> >> Best Regards, >> Joel >> ___ >> LibreOffice mailing list >> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice >> > > > ___ > LibreOffice mailing list > LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice > > -- Jonathan Aquilina ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Presentation Video Bug - Need Dev/QA Feedback

2014-06-03 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
hat are not necessarily native to windows itself as well. -- Jonathan Aquilina ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Quantifying the time overhead of Cygwin make

2014-06-11 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
> LibreOffice mailing list > LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice > -- Jonathan Aquilina ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Quantifying the time overhead of Cygwin make

2014-06-11 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
What would be interesting to see is a bench mark in terms of compilation times and evaluate if its really worth changing the ABI and breaking compatability. On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 06/12/2014 08:30 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > >> I am n

Re: Getting started, need to learn

2014-04-24 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
_____ > LibreOffice mailing list > LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice > > -- Jonathan Aquilina ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Presenter Console

2010-11-19 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
bold, 'line drawing' icons > > -- > Andrew > > ___ > LibreOffice mailing list > LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice > > -- Jonathan Aquilina ___ LibreOffice mailing l

[Libreoffice] compilation of LO on mac

2010-11-24 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
hey guys is it possible to compile LO on mac osx? if so what dependencies does one need to satisfy before compiling it. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] installation on mac doesnt require read me or licenses

2010-11-24 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
hey guys i'm noticing something interesting. wouldn't it be better to use an installer to make sure the read me's as well as the licenses get installed in the LO directory. currently the way it is i don't have to drag either of them into the application directory. __

Re: [Libreoffice] installation on mac doesnt require read me or licenses

2010-11-25 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
wrote: > Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > hey guys i'm noticing something interesting. wouldn't it be better > > to use an installer to make sure the read me's as well as the > > licenses get installed in the LO directory. currently the way it is > > i don&#x

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH 3/9] warnings in binfilters sc_interpr4.cxx

2010-11-25 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Quick question wouldn't it be better to have the comments in English instead of German? ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Crash after Preference selection on Mac

2010-11-26 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Chris i'm on a mac running 10.6.5 and cant replicate the issue. also i know a few weeks ago there was an update for java. do you have all updates installed for java? ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedeskto

Re: [Libreoffice] Are ISC/BSD-licensed contributions acceptable?

2010-11-26 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Why not see if someone can try to port it to python or code something in another language that would be more beneficial instead of java? On 11/25/10 1:52 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 09:47 +0100, Gioele Barabucci wrote: in bug #31633 I proposed a patch to one of the export fi

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-11-26 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
> > > > Thank you, > > Kendy > > All the details are here [1]. Feel free to jump in and add to the agenda. > ;-) > > [1] http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/ConfCalls > > David Nelson > __

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-11-26 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
hijacking the thread here, but it might come in hand if users who want to join in so they can give their point of view. are end users also welcome to join? On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:29 AM, David Nelson wrote: > Hi, :-) > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 18:22, Jonathan Aquilina > wrote

[Libreoffice] getting LO into debian

2010-11-27 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
hey guys what is being done to get LO into debian so that downstream ubuntu can get it pulled from the upstream debian repository? -- Jonathan Aquilina ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman

Re: [Libreoffice] getting LO into debian

2010-11-27 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Jani if im not mistaken if a bug gets filed they might include it. Isnt Canonical a sponsor of the project. if that is the case they might bypass the rule and include it directly with out going to upstream debian ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOff

Re: [Libreoffice] getting LO into debian

2010-11-27 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Andrew thats the problem with this medium today of emails and chats its hard to gauge ones emotions. i have to agree that there are some Ubuntu ops that might have a stick shove a little far up their backsides. Now I'm stopping there. ___ LibreOffice

Re: [Libreoffice] libreoffice3.3-freedesktop-menus-3.3.1.noarch.rpm - what distri is this for

2010-11-28 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
when it says no arch it means its not specific to any architecture like x86 or x86_64 arm or sparc etc. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] profiling & optimising ...

2010-11-28 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Funny you post this on the list i was asking about optimization of LO in irc the other day. Thanks for this interesting read :) ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] High contrast issue

2010-11-30 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
, but that is unrelated to the project. what could be done to see if the theme is a dark theme so that the start will have black text instead of white? On 11/30/2010 10:44 AM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:28:58 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: Hey guys I am experiencing a r

Re: [Libreoffice] High contrast issue

2010-12-01 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
If you guys have any further questions regarding this issue please don't hesitate to contact me. On 12/01/2010 03:01 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Jonathan, Jonathan Aquilina píše v Út 30. 11. 2010 v 09:28 +0100: Hey guys I am experiencing a really nasty HC issue. I am using the obs

Re: [Libreoffice] Error in autogen.sh of rawbuild : Bad substitution

2010-12-01 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
what is the difference between using /bin/sh and /bin/bash? On 12/2/10 4:35 AM, Suren wrote: Hey Kendy, The new portability stuff added to autogen.sh works fine for me now( in /bin/sh itself that is). Regards, ~Suren On 12/02/2010 04:49 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Julien, On 2010-12-01 a

Re: [Libreoffice] Is ant a pre-requisite for java support?

2010-12-02 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Is this when you run the autogen.sh? if it is, i had an issue with it bombing on junit. can you try and change in the autogen.sh from /bin/sh at the top to /bin/bash. that fixed my issue. if thats the case, not sure where else to turn to isolate this bug.. On 12/02/2010 12:10 PM, Wols Lists wr

Re: [Libreoffice] Is ant a pre-requisite for java support?

2010-12-02 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
also might want to pull the latest as it seems from talking to kendy on irc that he pushed some things to fix it. might want to keep it as is and pull latest and try with that. On 12/02/2010 12:37 PM, Wols Lists wrote: On 02/12/10 11:21, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: Is this when you run the

Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

2010-12-02 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
would that also fix the issue of LO not finding junit jar and needing to use --without-junit when running ./autogen.sh? On 12/2/10 5:33 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: So, As part of the quest to make LibreOffice easier to build; and in parallel to annoy developers who are missing those java

Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

2010-12-02 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
i'm not worried bout not having junit wasn't sure if junit would have been affected by --without-java. reason i was having as of last night was small issue with autogen.sh which kendy kindly fixed On 12/2/10 5:57 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 05:34:59PM +0100

Re: [Libreoffice] Deleting Java from Base

2010-12-03 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
i was talking to kendy this morning on irc and i was told that java is eventually going to be phased out its a matter of porting the code from java to c++. What i would be flustered with is where to begin in my honest opinion On 12/3/10 2:00 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Hi Wols, *, On Fri,

Re: [Libreoffice] New bootstrap: another stop

2010-12-03 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
As mentioned in a separate thread your going to have issues with Base if you disable Java. On 12/03/2010 06:47 PM, Wols Lists wrote: Replying to myself again ... And it appears to be a java problem ... changing the autogen arguments to --without-java and it's gone away ... Cheers, Wol On 03

Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

2010-12-03 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
This is quite interesting Sebastian. I'm on Kubuntu on my netbook and i am using the openjdk. From what i have asked in the past about java jre and jdk you can have multiple versions installed. on mac for instance it comes with both the 32bit and 64bit jdk and jre. On 12/2/10 8:22 PM, Sebastia

Re: [Libreoffice] The future of help [was: Re: Deleting Java from Base]

2010-12-03 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Are those tags XML tags? Was just thinking what about an XML based help system. I have seen programs that have the web based files but they are stored on the local machine. On 12/4/10 6:51 AM, Sophie Gautier wrote: On 03/12/2010 19:51, Cor Nouws wrote: Hi kendy, Jan Holesovsky wrote (03-12-1

Re: [Libreoffice] Deleting Java from Base

2010-12-05 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
:40:07PM +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Hi Jonathan, *, On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: i was talking to kendy this morning on irc and i was told that java is eventually going to be phased out its a matter of porting the code from java to c++. What i would be

Re: [Libreoffice] new bootstrap: quick stop

2010-12-05 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
I had an issue with /bin/sh as the shebang. Kendy seems to have fixed that issue for me. What i have been informed as to why /bin/sh is being used is for portability. On 12/6/10 2:17 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Thomas Klausner wrote: I found the simplest fix f

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-07 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Marc you mentioned a lack of a spell checker. what bout on any OS using another dictionary like Aspell or something of the sort? On 12/07/2010 07:33 AM, Marc Paré wrote: Le 2010-12-06 17:10, Michael Meeks a écrit : ingos usWell - we are looking again at how best to re-package it. The 'obvi

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-07 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Tor they wont, but what if they need a quick solution for something they need to work on at work, the could be in a lot of trouble. On 12/07/2010 01:24 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: Does it really matter a lot if downloading the LibreOffice installer takes four or eight hours on some specific slow

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1 spell checking

2010-12-08 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
What about mac and windows users? Is Hunspell available for them as well? On 12/8/10 10:34 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 09:20 +, Michael Meeks wrote: On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 14:33 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: Marc you mentioned a lack of a spell checker. what bout on

Re: [Libreoffice] High contrast issue

2010-12-08 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Kendy is this in regards to the high contrast issue I found? On 12/09/2010 02:13 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Andrew, On 2010-12-02 at 22:16 +, Andrew C. E. Dent wrote: I have made simple HC variants for the start center images here:http://people.bath.ac.uk/ea2aced/OOo/Backing_HC.zip Hop

Re: [Libreoffice] Bundled fonts

2010-12-10 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Shouldn't there be some sort of check against already system installed fonts so duplicate installation doesn't occur? I feel that fonts that aren't part of the system should be installed. On 12/11/10 8:18 AM, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote: Hello, On 12/08/2010 10:53 AM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:

Re: [Libreoffice] Help?

2010-12-12 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
I had come across this issue as well and removing the file it suggests works just fine. After you should be able to run make again no problem. On 12/13/2010 02:41 AM, Júlio Hoffimann wrote: Hi Jerry, I'm new to opensource like you, sometimes we just need to read. :-) This problem happened to

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-13 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
I have one suggestion and I have seen this on the Ubuntu wiki. When any editing is done on a page its emailed to a team, in this case the wiki team, and they check it for formatting so its consistent as well as the content. On 12/13/2010 11:46 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Jean-Baptiste, On

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp discussion

2010-12-13 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Regardless if its spam posting or editing of a pages its all moderated so if there is spam its automatically denied. also they have it to where you have to have a login to be able to do any editing. CAPTCHA can also help mitigate spam and bots when users sign up to be able to do any editing of

Re: [Libreoffice] howto tar or deb package

2010-12-22 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
What distro are you using? If you are using ubuntu, on irc.freenode.net there is an ubuntu-packaging channel. they might be able to provide you some help with packaging of LO. On 12/22/10 10:07 AM, Ralf Saalmüller wrote: Hello to LibreOffice a short introduction: I use StarOffice / OOo / Libr

Re: [Libreoffice] Updating to latest git source code

2011-01-05 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
type ./g pull -r in the boot strap directory let me know if it works. On 1/5/11 2:40 PM, Grega Fajdiga wrote: Hi, Could somebody tell me how to update to the latest git release? There used to be a bin/g scvript that did that but it's gone. Thanks, ___

Re: [Libreoffice] Thoughts on releasing ...

2011-01-07 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Michael you mention release updates more often. Does LO have a feature that can check against an update server that way we wont have to redownload and install LO. On 01/07/2011 01:40 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Cor, Sorry for the long delay; Christmas and all that. On Thu, 2010-12-16

Re: [Libreoffice] Linux distros and LibO packaging

2011-01-09 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Not trying to hijack the thread here but what is Ubuntu doing about LO i know its supposed to be part of their next release instead of OOo, but normally they get packages from upstream Debian, is someone working on getting it in Debian? On 01/09/2011 04:11 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: Hi al

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] request for review for patch for fdo#32742# regression

2011-01-12 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Not trying to hijack, but i'm still a novice developer still learning the ways of development, but is there such a thing as over optimization? On 1/12/11 7:36 PM, Noel Power wrote: On 12/01/11 18:03, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Octavio Alvarez wrote: On Wed, 12

Re: [Libreoffice] Build install for DEBS

2011-01-14 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Icecream allows you to spread the compile across multiple machines. On 1/14/11 4:06 PM, Andy Brown wrote: On Fri Jan 14 2011 01:03:13 GMT-0800 (PST) Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Andy, On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 19:24 -0800, Andy Brown wrote: I have been able to download and build the main branch for Li

Re: [Libreoffice] Build install for DEBS

2011-01-15 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
23:16:21 GMT-0800 (PST) Jonathan Aquilina wrote: Icecream allows you to spread the compile across multiple machines. Thanks for the information. Icecream will do me no good as my main machine is the only one that has the processing power to do the compiling. What I really need to find out is

Re: [Libreoffice] Leftovers

2011-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
The same thing happens with other apps on windows. On 1/17/11 12:53 AM, plino wrote: After uninstalling LO RC3, I noticed there are a few leftover files under Program Files\Libreoffice 3 and keys in the registry in HKLM if LO is installed for All users and in HKCU if it is installed for Current

Re: [Libreoffice] This will Blow you Away . Must Read !

2011-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Whats being done to prevent spam on the mailing lists? On 1/17/11 8:00 AM, David Tardon wrote: On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 04:00:02PM -0600, Conchita Aldridge wrote: Hi My name is Conchita I am sending you this E-mail to inform you of this One–of-a-kind System that is widely the fastest gr

Re: [Libreoffice] Announce: gnumake in LibreOffice

2011-01-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Great work, but out of curiosity wouldn't it be better to use cmake instead since we are cross compiling for different platforms? On 1/17/11 4:14 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: Hi all, I've been working for some time to integrate into LibreOffice the great work from Bjoern Michaelsen to migrate t

Re: [Libreoffice] Change executable/sh names

2011-01-17 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
You mentioned incremental updates. how is this done. does LO have an update menu item that will check an update repository and apply the updates, or is a whole reinstall necessary? On 01/17/2011 10:33 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi there, On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 04:12 -0800, plino wrote: Michael,

Re: [Libreoffice] This will Blow you Away . Must Read !

2011-01-17 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Prevention is the best policy IMHO how intensive is a Spam filter like spamassassin. i know someone who has it setup and it filters 1000 emails a min. On 01/17/2011 11:01 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Michael Meeks wrote: On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 08:09 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: Whats being

Re: [Libreoffice] This will Blow you Away . Must Read !

2011-01-17 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
: On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 08:09 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: Whats being done to prevent spam on the mailing lists? I guess - the thing that is blocking spam, is the presence of a set of list moderators with lots of time, willing to sift and/or approve legitimate mail from illegitimate

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] partial easy hack - removal of non-compiled / dead code in sc

2011-01-17 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
I 2nd unit testing. I use it a lot when doing programming in Java. I agree its a great way to test out ones logic before working with the code. Michael I think in this regard though things will be harder as a lot of code has already been implemented. If one isn't familiar with the already impl

Re: [Libreoffice] An image editing extension for writer

2011-01-17 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
I think the biggest question is if its possible to migrate this plugin away from Java, and into c++ for instance? do we have any guide lines established to tell devs/extension devs what they should do and what they should avoid? On 01/17/2011 10:32 PM, Wols Lists wrote: On 17/01/11 21:02, lak

Re: [Libreoffice] This will Blow you Away . Must Read !

2011-01-17 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
list if they stay getting said emails. they will choose to unsubscribe from the list/s On 01/17/2011 08:53 PM, Wols Lists wrote: On 17/01/11 09:11, Michael Meeks wrote: On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 08:09 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: Whats being done to prevent spam on the mailing lists

Re: [Libreoffice] LanguageTool (dev) crashes Libreoffice

2011-01-18 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 01/19/2011 07:28 AM, Arno Teigseth wrote: Hi all I know, it's LanguageTool's fault. I'm developing some rules, and running 1-3 dev. When right-clicking a word in trouble (red/blue underline), I get suggestions to how to fix it. But when I right-click a word that is just fine, then Libreoffi

[Libreoffice] PATCH removal of extra white space lines

2011-01-20 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Attached please find my first patch to remove white space lines in the filter/source/xmlfilteradaptor/genericfilter.cxx feedback is greatly appreciated. Licensed under LGPLv3 >From 744c48dd358a743118ba8cb1bf2162ca7d243df3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jonathan aquilina Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] repo base and filters: removal of extra newlines

2011-01-20 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Fyi that was listed on the easy hack page, which i too started working on, and put down on the wiki that i am working on it. with your permission would it be ok to use the perl script you created to help with this task, or edit the wiki and we can work on this together. What do you think? On

[Libreoffice] PATCH Removal of Extra white space lines

2011-01-21 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Attached please find my amended patch for the removal of extra white space lines in filter/source/xmlfilteradaptor/genericfilter.cxx MMeeks let me know how this looks if its good feel free to push >From 744c48dd358a743118ba8cb1bf2162ca7d243df3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jonathan aquil

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] repo base and filters: removal of extra newlines

2011-01-21 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
s). Licensed under LGPLv3+ / MPL Pushed your patch (Jonathan (eagles) did the other one earlier). It might be an idea to leave him to do the whitespace stuff, and see if your valuable perl skills can be applied to cleaning up eg. build.pl and make_installer.pl pieces which are in dire ne

Re: [Libreoffice] make errors installing dependencies at libIDL - mac osx

2011-01-22 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/22/11 1:59 AM, David Dumaresq wrote: Hi, I'm trying to get started contributing to libreoffice by setting up my Mac. I'm following the steps to prepare my system for dependencies and I'm using this document: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Install_Mac_OS_10.6.4_Depe

Re: [Libreoffice] make errors installing dependencies at libIDL - mac osx

2011-01-22 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/22/11 6:23 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 6:59 PM, David Dumaresq wrote: Hi, I'm trying to get started contributing to libreoffice by setting up my Mac. I'm following the steps to prepare my system for dependencies and I'm using this document: http://wiki.do

Re: [Libreoffice] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

2011-01-22 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/21/11 5:26 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi guys, So - I re-ran the analysis on RC4 which is here: http://users.freedesktop.org/~michael/sizes3.ods (2.2Mb) Apart from a minor cockup (leaving tons of themes in there - when we only really want tango + hicontrast) - the n

Re: [Libreoffice] ok to use MacPorts for dependencies??

2011-01-23 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/23/11 3:43 AM, David Dumaresq wrote: Hello, can anyone verify whether these steps are valid for building LibreOffice? I'm running with 10.6.6 on a 32 bit Mac. I got off to a bad start building manually and then found this link by searching the archives, so I jumped in and started with Mac

Re: [Libreoffice] ok to use MacPorts for dependencies??

2011-01-23 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Christian can you update the wiki please as it has a lot of stuff which as your saying isn't needed. On 1/23/11 4:28 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Hi *, On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: On 1/23/11 3:43 AM, David Dumaresq wrote: 1. coreutils (from MacPorts)

[Libreoffice] PATCH: Removal of last extral lines in genericfilter.cxx

2011-01-23 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Attached please find my patch for the removal of 2 extra lines which i forgot to remove with my first patch which i submitted. >From a5e6ed753aa02139aa2e9ddc481a929f9ee7b8c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jonathan aquilina Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 20:51:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] removed dou

[Libreoffice] PATCH: removal of extra lines in IDocumentFieldsAccess.hxx

2011-01-23 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Attached find a patch to remove extra lines in IDocumentFieldsAccess.hxx >From f997d5451e4893a68a4a5b1c3bb779bf060912f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jonathan aquilina Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 21:43:25 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] removed extra lines in file --- sw/inc/IDocumentFieldsAccess.

[Libreoffice] PATCH: removal of extra lines in attributeoutputbase.hxx

2011-01-23 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Attached please find the patch for attributeoutputbase.hxx to remove extra lines :) >From 5fffeca158bd90c63027c88ad0ae84a982749306 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jonathan aquilina Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 22:02:04 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] removal of extra lines --- sw/source/filter/

Re: [Libreoffice] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

2011-01-24 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 01/24/2011 11:39 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 10:55 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: Of course, help dunging out the sillies that still lurk in there - eg. 'soffice.exe' and 'soffice.bin', bundled testtool, and so on much appreciated. .. Out

Re: [Libreoffice] Build issue with cppu

2011-01-24 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/25/11 6:47 AM, surensp...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Dave, On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:42 AM, David Dumaresq wrote: I suggest you take a look at the advice under The Build Failed... What can I do? here, http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build Dave I already did that and h

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and Wayland support

2011-01-24 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/24/11 5:57 PM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: Hi all, Are there any moves afoot to support Wayland, the potential replacement for X on Linux ? Alex ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/l

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and Wayland support

2011-01-24 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/24/11 5:57 PM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: Hi all, Are there any moves afoot to support Wayland, the potential replacement for X on Linux ? Alex ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/l

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and Wayland support

2011-01-25 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/25/11 10:13 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: Le 25/01/11 08:24, Jonathan Aquilina a écrit : Hi Jonathan, Correct me if I am wrong but wont LO be a little screwed since LO only supports X from what I have seen codewise? That was precisely my point : applications have to be rewritten to work

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and Wayland support

2011-01-25 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/25/11 10:13 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: Le 25/01/11 08:24, Jonathan Aquilina a écrit : Hi Jonathan, Correct me if I am wrong but wont LO be a little screwed since LO only supports X from what I have seen codewise? That was precisely my point : applications have to be rewritten to work

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation fail for branch feature/gnumake2.1

2011-01-25 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/25/11 10:51 PM, Julien Nabet wrote: Hello, I made a make clean yesterday evening. I "git updated" even today followed with an autogen.sh and the compilation fails with this : build -- version: 275224 = Building module libwpd = Entering /home/maryline/gnumakelibr

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] some cppcheck cleaning in basctl

2011-01-26 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/26/11 10:24 PM, Julien Nabet wrote: Hello, Here is a patch for some cppcheck cleaning in basctl Compiling was ok My git account is now created but I don't know what to do next to push my commit. If someone could help me, ideally i need a quick tutorial step by step. I do this : ssh serva

Re: [Libreoffice] web based libre office

2011-01-27 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/24/11 5:53 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Ged, So - thank you for your nice ideas :-) we can setup a list for this discussion: crack-smoking-re-write-everyhing-in-javascr...@tdf.org or somesuch ? :-) On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 17:17 +0100, Ged Wed wrote: well you gotta start sometime and

Re: [Libreoffice] Calc crash when save as xls

2011-01-27 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/27/11 11:29 AM, Tantai Tanakanok wrote: Hi Kohei I create a branch work directory with your shell script. http://kohei.us/2010/11/16/working-with-a-branch-using-git-new-workdir/ I issue the command ./create-branch-build.sh ./libo/clone . libreoffice-3-3-0 After that I go into libreoffice-

Re: [Libreoffice] configure: WARNING: Your gcc is not -fvisibility=hidden safe. Disabling visibility

2011-01-28 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/27/11 10:20 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 13:56 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: Actually I think that warning might be bogus. Digging back into gcc PR26905 I see they specifically don't regress test for this bug on

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and (La)Tex

2011-01-28 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/28/11 12:52 AM, Alexander wrote: Hi, I want to suggest to add in LO support LaTeX as formulas generator. Instead or jointly of Math. Currently, LO inherited old non-wide used StarOffice syntax for formulas. It creates inconveniences: * For LaTex users. They have got used its syntax and

Re: [Libreoffice] configure: WARNING: Your gcc is not -fvisibility=hidden safe. Disabling visibility

2011-01-28 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/28/11 10:23 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 15:20 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: ld: warning: com::sun::star::uno::cpp_release(void*)has different visibility (hidden) in ../../unxmacxi.pro/slo/drwtrans.o and (default) in ../../unxmacxi.pro/slo/ucalc.o And is this a genuin

Re: [Libreoffice] configure: WARNING: Your gcc is not -fvisibility=hidden safe. Disabling visibility

2011-01-28 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/28/11 11:21 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 03:43 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 15:20 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: ld: warning: com::sun::star::uno::cpp_release(void*)has different visibili

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Easy hacks: remove double line spacing

2011-01-28 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/28/11 11:23 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 22:46 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote: Hi, I removed the double line spacings in one file. Hope the resulting style is ok. If so, I'll continue :-) Easy one. :-) Pushed. What file as its something i'm already working on with

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hacks: remove double line spacing

2011-01-28 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/29/11 12:28 AM, Guillaume wrote: Hi, I removed some empty lines in few files for my first patch. I'll continue if it's ok. Regards Guillaume ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/list

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove unused SalFontStructList

2011-01-28 Thread Jonathan Callen
The attached patch removes the declaration of SalFontStructList because it is completely unused. (Verified via ./g grep) This patch, like all other patches for LibreOffice from me (unless otherwise noted) is licensed under both the LGPLv3+ and the MPL. -- Jonathan Callen From

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hacks: remove double line spacing

2011-01-29 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/29/11 2:45 PM, Guillaume wrote: Le samedi 29 janvier 2011 à 01:31 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina a écrit : On 1/29/11 12:28 AM, Guillaume wrote: Hi, I removed some empty lines in few files for my first patch. I'll continue if it's ok. Regards

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hacks: remove double line spacing

2011-01-29 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/29/11 3:42 PM, Guillaume wrote: Le samedi 29 janvier 2011 à 15:27 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina a écrit : On 1/29/11 2:45 PM, Guillaume wrote: Le samedi 29 janvier 2011 à 01:31 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina a écrit : On 1/29/11 12:28 AM, Guillaume wrote: Hi, I removed some empty lines in few

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Easy hacks: remove double line spacing

2011-01-29 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/29/11 9:30 PM, Christina Roßmanith wrote: Hi Jonathan, I expected that there are people working on this topic because there are so many files already striked out on the list in the wiki (and there were many "pushed" messages on #libreoffice the last days). So I took one not i

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hacks: removed double line spacing (and some dead code)

2011-01-29 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/29/11 10:30 PM, Christina Roßmanith wrote: Hi, I'll strike out the files I've fixed on the list. Christina ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice much appreciated

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Convert tools/list.hxx usage to std::list

2011-02-01 Thread Jonathan Callen
and deallocated on removal, so I just made that more explicit by letting std::list handle it. As with all my patches, this is LGPLv3+/MPL. From ee05143cb845bf7f82cf1a55b5e72f7a932946c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonathan Callen Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 01:32:54 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Convert tools

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Convert tools/list.hxx usage to std::list

2011-02-01 Thread Jonathan Callen
On 02/01/2011 01:57 PM, Jonathan Callen wrote: > The attached patch replaces usage of LinkList (declared as > DECLARE_LIST(LinkList, Link*) with std::list. > > I used list instead of list because 1) the elements of the > list were only ever used from within the .cxx file dec

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp

2011-02-03 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 2/2/11 10:01 PM, Kevin Hunter wrote: At 3:31pm -0500 Wed, 02 Feb 2011, Michael Meeks wrote: On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 13:44 +, Wols Lists wrote: Not quite sure what you mean by "legacy Intel", but if you're referring to all single-processor CPUs, they still power most of the budget brand new

Re: [Libreoffice] Who do I know when a patch will make it to a release

2011-02-04 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
For patches to make it into the now stable 3.3.0 branch it would need approval of 3 developers. Once that is done the patch is pushed to the stable branch ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailm

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac builds / lang-packs ...

2011-02-07 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Yep - though I don't really like the installer concept on mac, I guess I'd then prefer to install all those langs unconditionally. If that turns out to cause issues, we can discuss other options. Thorsten I have seen on mac some installers that allow you to specify which drive to install on. Qu

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] tinbuild Readme

2011-05-11 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Attached is a patch which corrects an error with the example given in the tinbuild readme in regards to working with gmail. I also added that the smtp port needs to be changed in the tinbuild script itself to 587 if using gmail. Thanks Jonathan >From 570e0dbcbb692727a821dc0b8d71fc4ef8f69

[Libreoffice] .doc and .docx support in master

2011-05-17 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Hey guys I am trying to test out the master branch, and im noticing a major issue with the .docx as well as the .doc import filters. .docx im guessing is still not implemented, and if that is the case what stage is it at before we will have support for working with .docx documents. Also whe

Re: [Libreoffice] build breaks on i686

2011-05-17 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
I can confirm i have seen this in building as well on 64bit, running gcc 4.5 on kubuntu natty 11.04, the only difference is that the build continues for me and somehow successfully completes. If you take a look at my last tinbuild the dmake error appears somewhere in the tinbuild log. On 05/17

[Libreoffice] pulling modules prior to compilation

2011-05-22 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
hey guys i would like to try and pull all the modules prior to running autogen.sh? -- Jonathan Aquilina ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >