Not trying to hijack, but i'm still a novice developer still learning
the ways of development, but is there such a thing as over optimization?
On 1/12/11 7:36 PM, Noel Power wrote:
On 12/01/11 18:03, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Octavio Alvarez
<alvar...@alvarezp.ods.org> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 03:18:01 -0800, Noel Power<nopo...@novell.com>
wrote:
Hi there
fix for fdo#32742#, its a simple fix ( but was a bugger to find )
imo is
riskless etc.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/base/commit/?id=0afe2266016b03f6e11008463042c7daacead0e1
is ripe for signoff and cherrypicking, be grateful if someone could
help
with that
Is suggest to make ::std::sort on the next line use s_nCount also and
prevent a useless division operation.
Actually the 'useless' division' is resolved at compile time. so it
is free.
on the other hand passing s_nCount instead of a constant _could_
deprive the template code of some possible optimizations.
(I don't know if std::sort is smart enough to take avantage of it..
but it could, and eventually it will)
Norbert
the other thing to remember is that this is some static
initialisation, it is done just once, so even thinking about
optimising that would seem to be overkill :-)
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
