Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] cppcheck cleanliness: duplicate expression

Hello, Herbert, On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 07:23 +0200, Herbert Duerr wrote: > getting rid of the related UNO API would also be a good idea if there > wasn't the "UNO API semper fi" mantra. No such mantra in the LibreOffice world I guess :) F. ___ LibreO

Re: [Libreoffice] o3tl/cow_wrapper.hxx not found

(re-formatting the make output for clarity) > [ build CXX ] o3tl/qa/cow_wrapper_clients > R=c:/cygwin/home/Simon/git && > O=$R/libo/solver/wntmsci12.pro && > W=$R/libo/workdir/wntmsci12.pro && > S=$R/libo && Here the build mechanism sets some shell variables that will then be used later on the sa

Re: [Libreoffice] o3tl/cow_wrapper.hxx not found

On 9 September 2011 09:19, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > (re-formatting the make output for clarity) > >> [ build CXX ] o3tl/qa/cow_wrapper_clients >> R=c:/cygwin/home/Simon/git && >> O=$R/libo/solver/wntmsci12.pro && >> W=$R/libo/workdir/wntmsci12.pro && >> S=$R/libo && > > Here the build mechanism sets

Re: [Libreoffice] o3tl/cow_wrapper.hxx not found

> --- a/solenv/gbuild/platform/windows.mk > +++ b/solenv/gbuild/platform/windows.mk > @@ -234,10 +234,10 @@ endef >  endif > >  # Helper class > -gb_Helper_SRCDIR_NATIVE := $(shell cygpath -m $(SRCDIR) | $(gb_AWK) > -- '{ print tolower(substr($$0,1,1)) substr($$0,2) }') > -gb_Helper_WORKDIR_NATIVE

[Libreoffice] master: position to heigh while typing data in a cell

Hi Start spreadsheet type 8 or so > position is to heigh This changed somewhere between Build ID: 6ecb780-4eb4f62-09af278 Build ID: 11df18b-3f8994a-4525197 No issue (yet) -- - Cor - http://nl.libreoffice.org ___ LibreOffice mailing list Li

Re: [Libreoffice] Commit 66f05b5d5acc43e4615bc19045d3600ed93e328b breaks the build

Hi David, On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 06:28:30AM +0200, David Tardon wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 09:22:52PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > > > Unfortunately, system python is not always named 'python'. On one of my > > systems, it is named 'python2.6' and the build breaks when it encounters >

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] speed up localized builds by introducing po2lo

Hi Miklos, 2011/9/8 Miklos Vajna : > I'm attaching an updated patch that fixes po2lo on Windows, where it did > not translate anything due to path translating (/ vs \) issues. > First of all, many thanks for your work. Full build time in translations module with all languages took 82 minutes, with

[Libreoffice] Specification of the BITxxx functions

Hallo, my english is very very bad, therefore I need help. I've tried to describe the new functions in german. Can anybody it translate in english, and integrate in Pootle. Thanks Wolfgang BITxxx.odt Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text __

[Libreoffice] How to get LVS spellchk dict into distribution

Hi! I's like to know how it could be possible to get Latvian spellchecker dictionary into distribution. Regards Janis Eisaks developer of lv_LV and ltg_LV dics -- http://dict.dv.lv ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org ht

Re: [Libreoffice] A few questions for developers

On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 01:24 +0400, Dmitry. A. Ashkadov wrote: > I found that some functions/methods is never used. This functions are > listed in «unusedcode.easy» file. Is this file generated automatically > or I should modify it in case of removing unused functions? Both. So if you remove a me

Re: [Libreoffice] Specification of the BITxxx functions

Hi Translated to English, afraid I don't know enough to integrate into Pootle. Regards, Noel Grandin. Wolfgang Pechlaner wrote: > Hallo, > > my english is very very bad, therefore I need help. > I've tried to describe the new functions in german. > Can anybody it translate in english, and integr

Re: [Libreoffice] Specification of the BITxxx functions

Hi, 2011/9/9 Noel Grandin : > Hi > > Translated to English, afraid I don't know enough to integrate into Pootle. > > Very good, I'm taking over from here. Thanks, Andras ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedes

Re: [Libreoffice] cppcheck duplicate if expressions in bulmaper.cxx (sd part)

On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 08:19 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 09/08/2011 10:47 PM, julien2412 wrote: > > I checked the history, it's there since 16/11/2000 (commit > > 5dc708093d1ee179099abdcbf0c6f649b1c4deeb) > > > > could anyone explain to me the purpose of this ? Just a typo ? > > It's preced

Re: [Libreoffice] Specification of the BITxxx functions

Hi, Am 2011-09-09 13:10, schrieb Andras Timar: Hi, 2011/9/9 Noel Grandin: Hi Translated to English, afraid I don't know enough to integrate into Pootle. Very good, I'm taking over from here. In the description, I made an error. It should be : less then 2^48 and not less or equal 2^48. Ple

[Libreoffice] (no subject)

Hi everybody.im sorry to bother to you, but i wasnt sure where to go, im a very low level editor on wikipedia and i had created the libreoffice writer and libreoffice calc articles, they are quite small articles and were copied from the oo.o articles and then heavily modified, but im sure giv

Re: [Libreoffice] configure.in monstrosity

On Thursday 08 of September 2011, Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi Tomáš, > > On Thursday, 2011-09-08 14:50:00 +0200, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > > It would be really nice if that huge file would be split into several > > separate parts per-use. > > > > So I would like to propose slow cleanup/splitting to have s

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Add missing chart data point ODF1.2 standard symbols

Hi all, Final patch, now in one file :) Following problems are already in current LibO version and not caused by my patch: *Import of xls looses values of non-automatic fields *Import of xlsx sets the kind to "automatic" although they were explicitly set in Excel *Export to xlsx sets the kind

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Re: Fix configure to not require java packages when passed --without-java

Forgot to add the patch to the summary so doing now. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] master: position to heigh while typing data in a cell

Hi Cor, On Friday, 2011-09-09 10:26:05 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote: > Start spreadsheet > type 8 or so > > position is to heigh I assume this is due to http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=3364fefe1e2dec522211040f2f9ea37bf5cd7466 AFAIK Kohei is doing some work to adapt default ro

Re: [Libreoffice] master: position to heigh while typing data in a cell

On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 15:54 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi Cor, > > On Friday, 2011-09-09 10:26:05 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote: > > > Start spreadsheet > > type 8 or so > > > position is to heigh > > I assume this is due to > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=3364fefe1e2dec5222

[Libreoffice] [PATCH v2] convert Mesa to gbuild and add to tail_build

I've attached an updated patch to convert Mesa to gbuild and add it to tail_build. I've tested it with SYSTEM_MESA_HEADERS YES and NO. PeterFrom af6ae8a30ebea0f86ec2cb33bb94500cfbd3e027 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Foley Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 20:48:59 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] convert Mesa

Re: [Libreoffice] master: position to heigh while typing data in a cell

Hi Caolán, On Friday, 2011-09-09 16:00:20 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > > Start spreadsheet > > > type 8 or so > > > > position is to heigh > > > > I assume this is due to > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=3364fefe1e2dec522211040f2f9ea37bf5cd7466 > > I think this

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH v2] convert Mesa to gbuild and add to tail_build

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Peter Foley wrote: > > I've attached an updated patch to convert Mesa to gbuild and add it to > tail_build. I've tested it with SYSTEM_MESA_HEADERS YES and NO. > diff --git a/Mesa/prj/d.lst b/Mesa/prj/d.lst deleted file mode 100644 index 9690bd4..000 --- a/Mesa

Re: [Libreoffice] master: position to heigh while typing data in a cell

Eike Rathke wrote (09-09-11 15:54) I assume this is due to http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=3364fefe1e2dec522211040f2f9ea37bf5cd7466 AFAIK Kohei is doing some work to adapt default row heights in Calc. That's what swiftly passed my mind too. So experimental or not - migh

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH v2] convert Mesa to gbuild and add to tail_build

diff --git a/slideshow/Library_OGLTrans.mk b/slideshow/Library_OGLTrans.mk index f3dd316..9e31c16 100644 --- a/slideshow/Library_OGLTrans.mk +++ b/slideshow/Library_OGLTrans.mk @@ -63,6 +63,10 @@ $(eval $(call gb_Library_add_linked_libs,OGLTrans,\ $(gb_STDLIBS) \ )) +ifeq ($(SYSTEM_MESA_HEAD

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 12:56 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > 2/ I had a spike in IRC questions/confusions from new tentative > contributors on that topic, so I wanted to make it as newbie friendly > as possible. iow a 'just fscking work' approach. Cache compression is advertised as saving space i

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH v2] convert Mesa to gbuild and add to tail_build

On Fri, 9 Sep 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > diff --git a/slideshow/Library_OGLTrans.mk b/slideshow/Library_OGLTrans.mk > index f3dd316..9e31c16 100644 > --- a/slideshow/Library_OGLTrans.mk > +++ b/slideshow/Library_OGLTrans.mk > @@ -63,6 +63,10 @@ $(eval $(call gb_Library_add_linked_libs,OGLTran

Re: [Libreoffice] master: position to heigh while typing data in a cell

Hi, On Friday, 2011-09-09 15:54:55 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > > Start spreadsheet > > type 8 or so > > > position is to heigh > > I assume this is due to > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=3364fefe1e2dec522211040f2f9ea37bf5cd7466 With http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreof

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Terrence Enger wrote: > On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 12:56 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > >> 2/ I had a spike in IRC questions/confusions from new tentative >> contributors on that topic, so I wanted to make it as newbie friendly >> as possible. iow a 'just fscking work

Re: [Libreoffice] Bringing some sanity to interline spacing

Hi Khaled, On Friday, 2011-09-02 18:21:50 +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote: > > > MSWord is not known for its sane handling of font metrics, and I have > > > been told recent (2007-) broke it even further. > > > > Hum, ending up with .docs, .docxs, .rtfs that layout even further from > > their original

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH v2] convert Mesa to gbuild and add to tail_build

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Peter Foley wrote: >> > > Without the ifeq and with SYSTEM_MESA_HEADERS=YES I got this error. > > /root/libreoffice/slideshow/Library_OGLTrans.mk:66: *** > gb_LinkTarget_use_external: unknown external: Mesa.  Stop. what happen if you change the RepositoryExternal

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH v2] convert Mesa to gbuild and add to tail_build

oh and I forgot to ask: what is the value of SYSTEM_MESA_HEADERS in you EnvHost.sh ? Norbert ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Re: Bringing some sanity to interline spacing

Hi, Can someone with Windows please test the attached patch from Khaled? Please don't push as is, this needs to be encapsulated in the new SAL_USE_NEW_LINEHEIGHT=1 environment, so both old and new handling need to be available. Eike -- PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all priva

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

Talking about compression of the ccache cache, ... On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 11:35 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > > Well, my boxes are usually cpu bound (even with a fully hot ccache) > and I have plenty of space for my ccache, so that is not that clear a > choice to me. So, unconditional compressi

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Terrence Enger wrote: > I notice, BTW, that "How to build LibreOffice" > no > longer says that we automatically enable ccache if it is found on the > system. >  Should that statement be added back to the

Re: [Libreoffice] Bringing some sanity to interline spacing

On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 06:39:52PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi Khaled, > > On Friday, 2011-09-02 18:21:50 +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote: > > > > > MSWord is not known for its sane handling of font metrics, and I have > > > > been told recent (2007-) broke it even further. > > > > > > Hum, ending

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

On Friday 09 of September 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Terrence Enger wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 12:56 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > >> 2/ I had a spike in IRC questions/confusions from new tentative > >> contributors on that topic, so I wanted to make

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 12:47 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Terrence Enger > wrote: > > I notice, BTW, that "How to build LibreOffice" > > no > > longer says that we automatically enable ccache if it i

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Terrence Enger wrote: > On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 12:47 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Terrence Enger >> wrote: >> > I notice, BTW, that "How to build LibreOffice" >> > n

[Libreoffice] How to get LVS spellchk dict into distribution

Hi! I's like to know how can I get Latvian spellchecker dictionary into distribution. Regards Janis Eisaks developer of lv_LV and ltg_LV dics -- http://dict.dv.lv ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesk

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 37390, which changed state. Bug 37390 Summary: LibreOffice does not create valid ODF. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37390 What|Old Value |New Value

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote: >  So if ccache has 0% hit ratio, there is 17% overhead in this specific case. > With 100% hit ratio, 73% is saved. That, if my math is right, means at least > 19% ccache hit ratio is required for breaking even. I'm am gathering numbers, in the m

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] convert Mesa to gbuild

On 08.09.2011 02:40, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> >> I suppose that to be perfect that should bu tuck under >> gb_LinkTarget_use_Mesa in RepositoryExternal.mk to properly deal with >> the case when using system-mesa vs internal-mesa... >> >>

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH v2] convert Mesa to gbuild and add to tail_build

On Fri, 9 Sep 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Peter Foley wrote: > >> > > > > Without the ifeq and with SYSTEM_MESA_HEADERS=YES I got this error. > > > > /root/libreoffice/slideshow/Library_OGLTrans.mk:66: *** > > gb_LinkTarget_use_external: unknown external: Mes

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 20:22 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote: > On Friday 09 of September 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > > Could somebody else, preferably with a somewhat more common system :), post > their results, so that we can compare? I assume the ccache overhead (caused > by I/O I'd say) is exce

Re: [Libreoffice] How to get LVS spellchk dict into distribution

Hi, 2011/9/9 Jānis : > Hi! > > I's like to know how can I get Latvian spellchecker dictionary into > distribution. > Please give us the link to your spellchecker files and tell us about its license. From technical point of view it's a no-brainer to include it into our source tree. I can do that.

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: sal/inc

On 09/07/2011 02:56 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: sal/inc/sal/types.h | 16 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) New commits: commit de290e726ed2aa5a4c007d61a7db1042c45d43db Author: Bjoern Michaelsen Date: Wed Sep 7 12:37:08 2011 +0200 introduce SAL_DEPRECATED macro Is

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #201 from rpr.nos...@gmail.com 2011-09-09 12:46:16 PDT --- Nominating Bug 40482 - Non-printing characters become invisible. This is a rather annoying regression in Writer (LibO ver. 3.4.3). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesk

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 rpr.nos...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||40482 -- Configure bugmail: https

Re: [Libreoffice] o3tl/cow_wrapper.hxx not found

Hi Matus, all, I made that change, did make clean in o3tl and then make, now there is another error: C:/cygwin/home/Simon/git/libo /workdir/wntmsci12.pro/CxxObject/o3tl/qa/cow_wrapp er_clients.o C:/cygwin/home/Simon/git/libo /workdir/wntmsci12.pro/CxxObject/o3tl /qa/test-cow_wrapper.o C:/cygwin/h

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH v2] convert Mesa to gbuild and add to tail_build

On 09.09.2011 21:28, Peter Foley wrote: > On Fri, 9 Sep 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Peter Foley wrote: >>> >>> Without the ifeq and with SYSTEM_MESA_HEADERS=YES I got this error. >>> >>> /root/libreoffice/slideshow/Library_OGLTrans.mk:66: *** >>> gb_L

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] some cleaning for Windows part - need a review

hello, liking systematic work, I was cleaning the unreadVariable warning from cppchecker.:-) This also let improve my programming knowledge and style... Here a bunch of changes that touch only Win product,... that I am unable to test, having only unix. Neverless, I did it would it be to redu

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 14:04 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Terrence Enger > wrote: > > > > Uh oh. That page is restricted to administrators. > > no it is not. you just need to register to the wiki... but there is no > special restriction on that. Harrumph. I

Re: [Libreoffice] Bringing some sanity to interline spacing

hello With http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=052f181dad89ad34d90513bc9dcd3e3239727933 the new spacing is used only if SAL_USE_NEW_LINEHEIGHT=1 is set in the environment, else the old metrics are used. sorry, I am unable to find out the commit and the link point to nothin

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 14:22 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > > Now granted, once we can reliably do incremental build, the question > of the effectiveness of ccache will be much more acute. > presumable incremental build only try to compile stuff that _need_ to > be compiled and therefore should b

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Terrence Enger wrote: > On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 14:22 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> >> Now granted, once we can reliably do incremental build, the question >> of the effectiveness of ccache will be much more acute. >> presumable incremental build only try to compi

[Libreoffice] Cppcheck defect when @ is present

Hello, Following the pb "cppcheck duplicateExpression", I found why the "duplicateExpression" wasn't detected on salframe.cxx from aqua part. It's due to the @ use, for example @try, @catch and other things like this. As soon as the "@ parts" are commented out, detection works. I created the tick

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote: >  Since there (AFAIR) haven't been any actual data presented in the discussion here are some number for my linux buildbot. no ccache, clean full build real56m2.046s user187m2.925s sys 20m45.332s ccache, empty cache, clean full bui

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] speed up localized builds by introducing po2lo

On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 10:40:54AM +0200, Andras Timar wrote: > There are 2 minor issues. > 1. When the English string contains \n and translation does not > contain \n, the script outputs the English string instead of the > translation. See for example this line: > basctlsource\basicide\

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] cppcheck cleanliness: duplicate expression

Hello all, On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 14:03, Fridrich Strba wrote: > On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 07:23 +0200, Herbert Duerr wrote: >> getting rid of the related UNO API would also be a good idea if there >> wasn't the "UNO API semper fi" mantra. > > No such mantra in the LibreOffice world I guess :) So so

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] some cleaning for Windows part - need a review

> By the way, just a question: from which version is Windows supported? Only NT-based ones, WIndows 2000 or later. And even the Windows 2000 support is in my opinion "don't break it on purpose" only, I don't think anybody regularly checks that it works on Windows 2000. So in practice I think we wo