Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

If one of us (cloph) strongly feels that we should use # comments in configure.in and not dnl comments (well, keywords), and most others (?) (including me) are indifferent, why don't just change them all in one go then? I wonder if there is some cases where the dnl keyword can not just be change

Re: [Libreoffice] One Git Conversion Done. new repos online

Hello! Could You tell me, please, how long old repositories will be present? 07.08.2011 00:38, Norbert Thiebaud пишет: The One Git conversion is done. master is now at git clone git://anongit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core other than that, everything else should be pretty much the same. I

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] for Bug 32719

Hi Jeffrey, jeffrey chang píše v Po 01. 08. 2011 v 13:27 +0800: > Here is the patch for EasyHack 32719. Thank you very much for the patch! Before we can apply it, can you please clean it up a bit? - please do not introduce commented out code [like: // aLayoutSize.Height() = long (aLayoutSize

Re: [Libreoffice] [MHST][EasyHack] #38830 code review request

Hi Ta Tung, Ta Duc Tung píše v Po 18. 07. 2011 v 07:05 +0700: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34697 > Above easy hacks are marked as duplicate so I've submitted to #34697. > Please help me to review it :) I have pushed it in the following form: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreof

Re: [Libreoffice] One Git Conversion Done. new repos online

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Dmitry A. Ashkadov wrote: > Hello! > > Could You tell me, please, how long old repositories will be present? For at least until the end-of-life of the 3.4.x series... So I'd say at least another 6 months. probably more and we will probably just move them in a sub-d

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

Hi Norbert, *, On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Christian Lohmaier > wrote: >> >> if it's already an alias for ccache, it won't be prefixed with an >> additional "ccace" > [...] > I'm not sure I'm following: are you talking of the case whe

Re: [Libreoffice] One Git Conversion Done. new repos online

Norbert, is it possible to use new repositories now? Or «core» repository isn't ready now? The LO may be built from «core» repository on Linux and Windows? Thank You. 08.08.2011 11:54, Norbert Thiebaud пишет: On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Dmitry A. Ashkadov wrote: Hello! Could You tell

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][REVIEW] SetNamedRanges speedup fdo#35357

Hi all first sorry for my silence. Holidays with bad connectivity (and wife and children veto for using computers ;) ) I just want to thank all of you for finalizing this (and sorry kohei for missing the "content" thing) hacking libO is not that difficult but requires time. i'll try to propose o

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

Hi Tor, *, On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > If one of us (cloph) strongly feels that we should use # comments in > configure.in and not dnl comments (well, keywords), and most others (?) > (including me) are indifferent, why don't just change them all in one go then? I do

Re: [Libreoffice] One Git Conversion Done. new repos online

Will the release branch «libreoffice-3-4» available on «core» repository? http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/One_Git_Conversion -- Best Regards, Dmitry <>___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.fre

[Libreoffice] [Calc] Feature Request - charts : error bars + broken axes

Dear Developers, In case this list is not the best suited for the present request, please, let me know the address to that I should better use. Owing to all the feature already included, the Chart tool in Calc is very close to be a good alternative to specialised scientific graph softwares (like

Re: [Libreoffice] Build with --enable-werror

On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 14:42 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi, > > On Sunday, 2011-08-07 14:23:20 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > > > I'm trying to build with --enable-werror > > Seems I'm hit by http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40146 > Ok, I'll skip that file, wait for my new machine and in

Re: [Libreoffice] One Git Conversion Done. new repos online

Hi Norbert, Kohei, Kohei Yoshida píše v Ne 07. 08. 2011 v 13:33 -0400: > On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > > The One Git conversion is done. Hooray! :-) Thanks so much for that! > Just want to make sure I understand our plan correctly. The core > repository is for the

Re: [Libreoffice] One Git Conversion Done. new repos online

On 08/08/2011 10:47, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Norbert, Kohei, Kohei Yoshida píše v Ne 07. 08. 2011 v 13:33 -0400: On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: The One Git conversion is done. Hooray! :-) Thanks so much for that! Just want to make sure I understand our plan corr

Re: [Libreoffice] [MHST] GDB doesn't show name of methods in backtrace

Hi Ta Tung, Ta Duc Tung píše v St 03. 08. 2011 v 15:16 +0700: > I attach the patch for sw. It's used to add a radio button to print > dialog in Writer. Please apply and see the bug. > In this patch, I add a new radio button named Current page to print > dialog. Instead of this approach, I've j

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Consistent paragraph border handling for HTML export

Hi Harri, Harri Pitkänen píše v St 03. 08. 2011 v 18:46 +0300: > Attached patches remove the special case where border settings tab disappears > from paragraph settings dialog when Writer is in HTML editor mode and "HTML > 3.2" is selected as format option for HTML export. The second patch enab

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

On Monday 08 of August 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > I've pushed > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=57cf026739a3d707378 >ca38f59518b018fccca8f > > This try to automatically use ccache when present, unless CC= or CXX= > was specified by the user or --disable-ccache was passe

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

Hi Lubos, On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Lubos Lunak wrote: > On Monday 08 of August 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> I've pushed >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=57cf026739a3d707378 >>ca38f59518b018fccca8f >> >> This try to automatically use ccache when present, unles

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Replace SvULongs with vector and code clean up part 1

Hi Maciej, On Sunday, 2011-08-07 17:04:49 +0200, Maciej Rumianowski wrote: > >From ba07b8f694f9736b9c43dc3f0a34d1248d8fcd77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Maciej Rumianowski > Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 16:46:17 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] Replace SvULongs with vector and code clean up > > Instead of

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

On Monday 08 of August 2011, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Lubos Lunak wrote: > > On Monday 08 of August 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > >> I've pushed > >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=57cf026739a3d707 > >>378 ca38f59518b018fccca8f > >> >

Re: [Libreoffice] Reporting an error when loading of a component fails

On Aug 4, 2011, at 1:04 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote: > On Wednesday 03 of August 2011, Caolán McNamara wrote: >> On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 14:58 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote: >>> - osl_loadModule*() functions are plain C functions from stable API, so >>> no overloading to add the extra argument for the error mes

Re: [Libreoffice] Problem with embedded images

On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 15:09 -0700, tka0330 wrote: > The number 2048 (2 ^ 11) is not accidental. I checked that each save the > file doubles the number of tags referring to the same object. What we really need is a bug filed about this with a sample document attached to it that makes it as easy as

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Fwd: [PATCH] Bug 39167

Hi, On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > can you propose an alternative patch in the bug report? I'll try to produce something in the next few days. And about all the politics here ... I just don't know where to stand. The two Easy Bugs in question here really seem to have

Re: [Libreoffice] Reporting an error when loading of a component fails

On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 11:56 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > one could even imagine locking a mutex around dlopen/dlerror in > osl_loadModule, so that at least all non-third-party-calls to > dlopen/dlerror cooperate for correct multi-threaded behavior. But > that would probably be overkill.) I

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Bug 39168

Hello, I would like to inform everyone that I attached my purposed patch that fixes the bug 39168 in our bug report page, since it causes an already mentioned problem in the overwriting dialog's popup I don't consider it as something stable, but as in the recent days there were arguments abou

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

> I think this feature is trying to be way too clever. I think I agree with Lubos here. Better to let those who know what ccache is, and who think/know they will benefit from it, decide themselves whether to use it, and exactly how. --tml ___ LibreO

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix building bridge with -mavx

On Aug 2, 2011, at 1:18 PM, Tomas Chvatal wrote: > Libreoffice bridge code won't compile on new CPUs which add -mavx to cxxflags > with --march=native. > As first idea for the fix is actual ban for the -mavx cxxflag by adding > -nomavx. I'm curious, in what way does the implicit -mavx cause the

Re: [Libreoffice] SfxItemSet reimplementation (was: va_start without va_end)

Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > > Hi Norbert, all, > > On Thu, 4 Aug 2011 20:47:43 -0500 > Norbert Thiebaud > wrote: > >> The va_end manpage, on linux says: >> "Each invocation of va_start() must be matched by a corresponding >> invocation of va_end() in the _same function_" >>

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix building bridge with -mavx

On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 12:18 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On Aug 2, 2011, at 1:18 PM, Tomas Chvatal wrote: > > Libreoffice bridge code won't compile on new CPUs which add -mavx to > > cxxflags with --march=native. > > As first idea for the fix is actual ban for the -mavx cxxflag by adding > >

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Replace SvULongs with vector and code clean up part 1

Hi Maciej, On Monday, 2011-08-08 11:41:20 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=c1be3dab3d37b74570b49d8534c4d2677a318286 Bad bad me, you'll also need http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=2ccabe21ad789aa0bc2c3bd7834a18760ff4f2da htt

Re: [Libreoffice] One Git Conversion Done. new repos online

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > On 08/08/2011 10:47, Jan Holesovsky wrote: >> >> Hi Norbert, Kohei, >> >> Kohei Yoshida píše v Ne 07. 08. 2011 v 13:33 -0400: >> >>> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Norbert Thiebaud >>>  wrote: The One Git conversion is done. >>

[Libreoffice] [GSoC] [rtfimport] 11th week

Hi, Previous week starts here: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vmiklos/lo-gsoc/tree/README#n1208 In short, it was about: - improved copy&paste import to use the new RTF filter in experimental mode - added unit test in writerfilter, it tests 8 files (6 expected pass, 2 expected fail, all test do

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] SAL_ALLOW_LINKOO_SYMLINKS, libreoffice-3-4 sal module with dbglevel=2: init test fails

On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 11:32 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > Ah, I found: > solenv/bin/linkoo:export SAL_ALLOW_LINKOO_SYMLINKS=1 > sc/source/ui/vba/testvba/runTests.pl: $ENV{"SAL_ALLOW_LINKOO_SYMLINKS"} = "1"; > toolkit/workben/layout/TEST:export SAL_ALLOW_LINKOO_SYMLINKS=1 > > > > I worked aro

[Libreoffice] Blocker Bug for 3.4.2 release

Hello, I decided to rate "Bug 39510 - CRASH closing document with footnotes" as a blocker, because LibO currently is unusable for scientific texts or other ones with many footnotes, see my Comment 7 in the bug. I know it's rather late and

Re: [Libreoffice] build problems with cppunit (windows)

On Sat, 2011-08-06 at 19:12 +0400, Dmitry. A. Ashkadov wrote: > I have the same problem. I tried to build LO (branch > «libreoffice-3-4-2») but building fails on module xml2cmp with same > error. I really don't understand how You built a stable LibreOffice > 3.4.2... > TypeInfoHelper.obj : erro

Re: [Libreoffice] curiosity in OResultSet.cxx

On Sat, 2011-08-06 at 14:01 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote: > Do you know what I might be able to do to make LibreOffice > execute the line in question? The queries I tried did not > execute the line, and I confess that I did not persist very > long exploring in opengrok. Given that our default allo

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice Alfresco platform at alfresco.libreoffice.org and documentation.libreoffice.org

Hello Dan, On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 17:11 +0300, Dan Corneanu wrote: > I have started to implement a skeleton in C++ for a CMIS UCP. > What would be a good place to share/publish the code? > I have started from the UCB module by creating a local development > branch. I suppose it would be possible to

Re: [Libreoffice] two assertions raised and a failed database query

On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 11:32 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote: > Greetings, > > I am asking here about a couple of raised assertions and a > failed database query. Maybe there is a connection, but > maybe not. > > My system is ubuntu-natty (11.04), and I did a build with > configuration parameters >

Re: [Libreoffice] va_start without va_end

Hi Julien, On Thursday, 2011-08-04 23:10:08 +0200, Julien Nabet wrote: > /libs-gui/i18npool/source/calendar/ > calendar_gregorian.cxx 62 va_start(ap, pat); > 59 static void debug_cal_msg(const char *pat, ...) > 60 { > 61 va_list ap; > 62 va_start(ap, pat); > 63

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fix for fdo#39915: defining named ranges should be case insensitive

Hello, this patch makes our check for existing named ranges in Insert->Names->Define case insensitive. Our formula compiler is already case insensitive so we shouldn't be able to create two named ranges with the same case insensitive name. Regards, Markus From c780ab6059ce88ac694d3007f67ed8fe1411

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fix for fdo#39678: don't write table:protection-key-digest-algorithm to odf 1.1 or odf 1.0

On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 18:27 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > changed it and pushed to master: Looks good. Pushed the attached patch to the 3-4 branch with my sign-off. Kohei ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.fr

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Rainer Bielefeld changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||39026 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Biel

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] configure help text incorrect: --with-system-sane(-header)

On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 11:30 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > Hi, > > The bootstrap configure help text claims it supports > --with-system-sane-header, but when passed this option it says > "warning: unrecognized option --with-system-sane-header". The option > actually implemented is called --wit

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEWED] [PUSHED 3-4] fix for fdo#39915: defining named ranges should be case insensitive

On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 17:30 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > Hello, > > this patch makes our check for existing named ranges in > Insert->Names->Define case insensitive. Our formula compiler is > already case insensitive so we shouldn't be able to create two named > ranges with the same case insens

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEWED] [PUSHED 3-4] fix for fdo#39678: don't write table:protection-key-digest-algorithm to odf 1.1 or odf 1.0

Marked [PUSHED 3-4]. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] curiosity in OResultSet.cxx

On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 15:10 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sat, 2011-08-06 at 14:01 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote: > > Do you know what I might be able to do to make LibreOffice > > execute the line in question? The queries I tried did not > > execute the line, and I confess that I did not persi

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [MHST] GDB doesn't show name of methods in backtrace

Hi, Just a short message for a crazy idea that's somewhere in the middle. Make it work like the find bar: * defaults to grey italicised text reading "Current page (n)" (with n being the page number of the current page, although the part in brackets is optional and I'd love Christoph's opinion here

[Libreoffice] [BUG] dbaccess/xmlfilter.cxx

Hello, I found out that on make -sr debug=true dbglevel=2 dbaccess did not compile successfully, the problem is with xmlfilter.cxx, it uses OStringBuffer, but there is no include to use it, so cxx says: "OStringBuffer is not a member of rtl namespace" I did the include, and the build works fi

Re: [Libreoffice] two assertions raised and a failed database query

On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 16:14 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 11:32 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote: > > (snip) > > This table is described in bug > > 34309 "error on importing a timestamp field from db2 via > > ODBC"

Re: [Libreoffice] build problems with cppunit

I tried build LO from 'core' repository on Windows 7. The result is the same error. Modules 'cppunit' and 'xml2cmp' wasn't built due to the same unresolved external symbol. We tried to build devel. version of LO, but the define «_DEBUG» is not really set. ((( 31.05.2011 01:03, Regina Hensche

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] memory leak in calc

Hello, http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/calc/commit/?id=41f8f6d3503e91f23a6d58cbab5ae314f663aab9changes delete to delete[] for a pointer that was created with new[]. I think it should be included into the 3-4 branch since this removes a memory leak. Regards, Markus ___

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEWED] [PUSHED 3-4] memory leak in calc

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > Hello, > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/calc/commit/?id=41f8f6d3503e91f23a6d58cbab5ae314f663aab9 > changes delete to delete[] for a pointer that was created with new[]. > > I think it should be included into the 3-4 branch since t

Re: [Libreoffice] va_start without va_end

I commited and pushed the first and second case. I let the third case for the moment. Julien. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/va-start-without-va-end-tp3223648p3236981.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

[Libreoffice] svx: successful linking of libsvxcore hides compile error

Hi, A very disturbing scenario: During make in svx if compiling svx/source/items/numfmtsh.cxx fails, Library/libsvxcorelo.so is still linked because it does not depend on it. So far so good, but there's no indication at the end whatsoever that something failed as the screen is filled with object f

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use STL find() in SvxNumberFormatShell

Hi Eike, Dnia 2011-08-07, nie o godzinie 21:31 +0200, Eike Rathke pisze: > > I suggest > > ::std::vector::iterator GetAdded_Impl( size_t nKey ); > > with logically the content of IsAdded_Impl() but using ::std::find() > instead of the awkward loop and returning the position's iterator that > can

[Libreoffice] Suggestion and patch for "Confirmation of save format" dialog

HI, For a long time I have been annoyed at the "Are you sure you want to save as a .DOC" message, as I find the buttons confusing. I have made some changes, with the button to show the format name. Screenshots: http://thejosh.info/libreoffice/export_format1.png http://thejosh.info/libreoffice/ex

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fix for fdo#37319: don't write invalid references to odf files

Hello, this patch removes entries like #REF! A1:A3 for named ranges when the sheet referenced by the named range is no longer there. I implemented Regina's first suggestion because I don't see a way to implement the other version with our current formula api. All in all this should be quite a sav

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fix for fdo#37319: don't write invalid references to odf files

Can you double-check the bug number? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37319 is closed as INVALID. I don't think this is the bug you are referring to... Kohei ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.free

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fix for fdo#37319: don't write invalid references to odf files

Hello Kohei, oh sorry. It's 37391. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37391 2011/8/9 Kohei Yoshida > Can you double-check the bug number? > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37319 > > is closed as INVALID. I don't think this is the bug you are referring > to... > > Kohei

[Libreoffice] Custom Animation not working

Hi, I rercently built 3.5 codebase, cloned 2 weeks back. I'm surprised to see that custom animation is not working. It was working fine in previous production releases, like 3.3.2, and 3.4.0 Is there anyone else who can confirm? -- Swagat ___ LibreOffi