Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > > Hi Norbert, all, > > On Thu, 4 Aug 2011 20:47:43 -0500 > Norbert Thiebaud <nthieb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> The va_end manpage, on linux says: >> "Each invocation of va_start() must be matched by a corresponding >> invocation of va_end() in the _same function_" >> (emphasis is mine) >> so it's not just ugly, but also 'wrong'... > > FWIW, I tried a clean new from the group up reimplementation of > SfxItemset once in cws new_itemsets: > ... > Maybe somebody is interested in integrating the replacement Itemset? I > added an EasyHack for it: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39849 > Although that is a truely challenging task, it would also be most > rewarding. > > Best, > > Bjoern > > > -- > https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen > > > _______________________________________________ > LibreOffice mailing list > LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice > I don't know if i can do this easyhack but what about the 3 cases of vm_end ? Should vm_end be added ? If yes, i can commit and pushed them for the 2 first cases. For the third case, i can also do it but I can't check before since it impacts above all Windows parts and I compile on Linux.
Julien. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/va-start-without-va-end-tp3223648p3235171.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
