On Monday 08 of August 2011, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Lubos Lunak <l.lu...@suse.cz> wrote: > > On Monday 08 of August 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > >> I've pushed > >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=57cf026739a3d707 > >>378 ca38f59518b018fccca8f > >> > >> This try to automatically use ccache when present, unless CC= or CXX= > >> was specified by the user or --disable-ccache was passed to autogen > >> This also detect if CC or CXX is already an alias for ccache, in which > >> case ccache is not prefixed to CC and/or CXX > > > > I disagree with this change, as it does not improve anything for > > anybody. Ccache needs an explicit setup for LO anyway, > > No, no specific setup necessary, using the symlinks or exporting > CC/CXX is standard way.
By setup I meant increasing the ccache size, although I didn't realize that LO build might fit if one builds without any debug info. > > so people who have already done > > their setup will need to adjust for this. People who only have ccache > > installed but haven't done anything will get slower builds, as the > > default ccache cache size is vastly unsufficient for LO builds, > > Not true either. Default ccache size is 1GB, and that is enough when > you focus on one branch. (a build uses less than 500MB) This is not true if the build uses any kind of debug info, and I would find it a really nasty surprise that one would need to explicitly adjust ccache when enabling debug build. I think this feature is trying to be way too clever. -- Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
