Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice] [PUSHED] EasyHacks: Reanimating more tests in ure/sal

On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 11:10:07PM +0100, Wilhelm Pflüger wrote: > More reanimated tests. The osl/file part is not satisfying. I had to > switch off some tests in osl_old_test_file.cxx. Maybe it is not worth to > keep it. > > These patches are LGPLv3+/MPL. > Nice work! I have a couple of comment

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove bogus comments + bash line

Hi Guilaume, you can request a git account an push the patches by your own: http://freedesktop.org/wiki/AccountRequests Thomas On 02/08/2011 08:57 AM, Guillaume Poussel wrote: > I have edited the wiki to show I'm currently working on it. > Please find attached again new patches to remove this c

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice] [PUSHED] EasyHacks: Reanimating more tests in ure/sal

On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 09:16:54AM +0100, David Tardon wrote: > On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 11:10:07PM +0100, Wilhelm Pflüger wrote: > > More reanimated tests. The osl/file part is not satisfying. I had to > > switch off some tests in osl_old_test_file.cxx. Maybe it is not worth to > > keep it. > > >

Re: [Libreoffice] issue with Borderline structure

On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:22:50PM +0100, Dietmar wrote: > I am having an issue with my extension Borderliner written in Java. It > works fine with Oracle OOo, but does not with Go-OO and LO. Yes, we know already: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33397 . D. ___

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Corrected typo in names of four swriter classes

On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:30:47PM +0100, Christoph Herzog wrote: > From c70749b0ae94c606f87398b36f7a8a4aa4ae9fb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Christoph Herzog > Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 21:20:16 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] Corrected typo in names of four swriter classes > > Checked for the misspel

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice] [PUSHED] EasyHacks: Reanimating more tests in ure/sal

Hi David, > 4. Special preprocessor magic is required... > > 5. sal tests are 'special' with regard to cppunit... Could you summarise this sort of information on the wiki somewhere? A lot of the code-base seems to have very little testing in place and dependency issues make it hard enough to ad

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] BorderLine fix

Hello fellow hackers, David fixed the BorderLine API problem a while ago with this commit http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=0d209ac289dd5c79da6950b4c01b0cec9b7fbe6d in master. I reviewed it and would be ok to cherry-pick it into 3.3.1 branch. Could anybody else review

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Get rid of SvBytes/SvSvULongs in SwUndoDelNum

On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 23:31 +0300, Andrey Turkin wrote: > So that would be the next step? Should I squash the two patches and resubmit > it? Hopefully, Michael or somebody will push the pair of them. Since we both seem to be looking at this section of the EasyHacks, can I suggest we follow Micha

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] patch lib-core/eventattacher

On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:20:55PM +0100, Rob Snelders wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a small patch which translates the comments in the > eventattacher from German to English > Thanks, pushed! D. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.o

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] BorderLine fix

On 08/02/11 09:33, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: Hello fellow hackers, David fixed the BorderLine API problem a while ago with this commit http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=0d209ac289dd5c79da6950b4c01b0cec9b7fbe6d in master. I reviewed it and would be ok to cherry-pick it

[Libreoffice] [PATCH][EasyHacks] Get rid of SvBytes and SvULongs in SwLayCacheIoImpl

Hi, Attached is a patch to remove a couple more uses of svarray stuff from writer. Nigel >From 54529e04dcd47306724c478d3ac177a63ce24a42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nigel Hawkins Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:09:53 + Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Remove svArrays from SwLayCacheIoImpl --- sw/source/cor

[Libreoffice] self-introduction Bjoern Michaelsen

Hi all, I would like to shortly introduce myself as new contributor to LibreOffice: I am Bjoern Michaelsen and I work on the Ubuntu Desktop Team and will take responsibility for the Libreoffice packaging there. I joined Canonical starting February, 1st. Before joining Canonical I have been part

[Libreoffice] FreeBSD support round2

Hi, here is a new set of simple patches for freebsd. libs-gui-fix-spadmin set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH so be able to correctly launch spadmin bootstrap-cleanup-unx-fbsd.mk is inspired by openbsd, it is a huge simplification of what was done before + it prevents from having different shared library nam

[Libreoffice] Fw: [PATCH] Removed unused functions and classes from calc 3last

Hi, Could somebody advise if the patch below is acceptable or if I should change it somehow? If it can't be committed for some reason, please let me know so that I can focus on some other area. Thanks & regards, Alfonso - Forwarded Message From: Alfonso Eusebio To: LibreOffice Li

Re: [Libreoffice] self-introduction Bjoern Michaelsen

On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 10:32:13AM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > I would like to shortly introduce myself as new contributor to > LibreOffice: Welcome! From git log: commit f6a16194d1348cb1c679acec5cd9e014ca3f3104 Author: bjoern.michael...@canonical.com Did you accidently swap your real

[Libreoffice] Issues for pivot tables ... where to post

Hi Kohei, *, Someone writes about an issue in OOo/Lo 330, that was not present in OOo 321. Is it better to post that in Bugzilla or in the OOo IssueTracker? (Currently I see one Pivot-issue - 33990 - in Bugzilla) Thanks, Cor -- - giving openoffice.org its foundation :: The Document Foundati

Re: [Libreoffice] self-introduction Bjoern Michaelsen

Hi Miklos, On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 12:37:58 +0100 Miklos Vajna wrote: > Did you accidently swap your real name and email address in your git > config? Yes, and it is fixed by now. Quoth my IRC log from yesterday: 16:13 * Sweetshark searches through the git scm book for "how to not botch your first

Re: [Libreoffice] EasyHacks: Make existing tests work (ure/sal)

On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 23:45 +0100, Wilhelm Pflüger wrote: > Attached please find some changes to make tests in ure/sal work. > > One test fails and breaks the build though I looked back over the history of the code related to that failing test and I see that some years ago it was tweaked to spec

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] BorderLine fix

On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 10:33 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > Hello fellow hackers, > > David fixed the BorderLine API problem a while ago with this commit > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=0d209ac289dd5c79da6950b4c01b0cec9b7fbe6d > in master. > > I reviewed it and wo

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Build fails in i18npool

On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 15:47 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > What was it ? The specific thing that Fridrich fixed was a dubious hash_map/unordered_map::erase on the results of a hash_map/unordered_map::find when find returns the end iterator to indicate that nothing was found > Oh, and by the way,

Re: [Libreoffice] self-introduction Bjoern Michaelsen

Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > I am Bjoern Michaelsen and I work on the Ubuntu Desktop Team and will > take responsibility for the Libreoffice packaging there. I joined > Canonical starting February, 1st. > Hi Björn, a warm welcome, also here on this list - looking forward to work with you! Also than

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] removed more blank lines/reordered #include's

On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 08:54 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote: > There are at least three different stlpool.hxx in different directories > of LO, but > it is included just as "#include ". I think that > ../../../../inc/bf_sd/stlpool.hxx is the one which is included, but I am > not sure. Shouldn

[Libreoffice] talk about software deployment

Hello, I was invited to LOADays in Antwerp, Belgium, to deliver a talk on LibreOffice software deployment mid of April. However, I don't know if I can make it, so I'd like to ask if one of you with expertise in this area would be interested to go there? Travel funding might be possible. *NO

[Libreoffice] [Bug 32894] [Task] LibreOffice 3.3.1 release blockers / stoppers

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32894 --- Comment #16 from Tor Lillqvist 2011-02-08 06:12:07 PST --- Nominating bug #31023. And when I say "nominate", I mean "suggest". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail b

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Build fails in i18npool

On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 01:47:17PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 15:47 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > > Oh, and by the way, createRegistryServiceFactory() used in saxparser.cxx > > is deprecated in OpenOffice: > > A lot of things that are deprecated remain in there, not

[Libreoffice] How to make cell with list data validation, a combo box

Hello, I've been trying to make a combobox for a cell with Data Validation > List for LibreOffice calc. I thought I could add that in the source and try out - so I downloaded LO source and started greping for text, all thanks to the excellant LO page to do so and the LibreOffice IRC channel. Now

[Libreoffice] [PATCH][EasyHacks] Remove some use of svarray stuff in SwScriptInfo

Hi, The attached patch removes one use of SvBytes and SvXub_StrLens from SwScriptInfo. There are still other uses in there to be replaced, but the bits don't interact very much. Changes under LGPLv3+/MPL Nigel. >From 8d92a6e07a576a76b429f98c10ab48975a69768f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nigel

Re: [Libreoffice] LibO security

At 2:22am -0500 Tue, 08 Feb 2011, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Well, we have. It's Cc-ed. What we prolly need is to properly document this. No no! They're just practicing good security: obscurity! ;-) Kevin ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists

Re: [Libreoffice] self-introduction Bjoern Michaelsen

On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 10:32 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > I am Bjoern Michaelsen and I work on the Ubuntu Desktop Team and will > take responsibility for the Libreoffice packaging there. I joined > Canonical starting February, 1st. And - just to say in public; what is well known in pr

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] lp#696527 enabling Human icons theme in 3.3 branch

Hi all, on the master branch I already commited: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=f6a16194d1348cb1c679acec5cd9e014ca3f3104 http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-gui/commit/?id=00b43fc0d82950e2abc57cca3746d395252bc9e0 http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/compon

Re: [Libreoffice] LibO security

On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 08:22 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > yes, since we've merged all code from OOo 3.3.0 (with the exception > of one rather broken calc fix). .. > Well, we have. It's Cc-ed. What we prolly need is to properly > document this. We could do worse than cutting / pasting /

[Libreoffice] lots of fallback icons shown in menus

So my GNOME settings are by default to not show icons in menus so I didn't notice that we show a placeholder graphic for all missing icons in menus. That means though that *all* menu entries have an icon beside them when icons are turned on, and a load of them are the broken graphic placeholder.

Re: [Libreoffice] Issues for pivot tables ... where to post

On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 13:23 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: > Hi Kohei, *, > > Someone writes about an issue in OOo/Lo 330, that was not present in OOo > 321. > > Is it better to post that in Bugzilla or in the OOo IssueTracker? > (Currently I see one Pivot-issue - 33990 - in Bugzilla) Let's put it in

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Updated Serbian translation

2011.01.23. 16:24 keltezéssel, Andras Timar írta: > 2011/1/23 Goran Rakic : >> У нед, 23. 01 2011. у 08:05 +0100, Andras Timar пише: >> >>> This patch does not apply cleanly on the current files. >> >> I made a patch against master branch, attached is the updated patch >> against libreoffice-3-3. D

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Updated Serbian translation for 3.3.1

On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 00:30 +0100, Goran Rakic wrote: > Patch against the libreoffice-3-3 branch attached. Timar pushed this into 3-3 back on the 2nd. Thanks for these. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.free

[Libreoffice] [Bug 32894] [Task] LibreOffice 3.3.1 release blockers / stoppers

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32894 Bug 32894 depends on bug 32329, which changed state. Bug 32329 Summary: [MAILMERGE] E-Mail server connection fails https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32329 What|Old Value |New Value

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] lp#696527 enabling Human icons theme in 3.3 branch

Hi Bjoern, ok for me for 3.3.1 -- Cedric On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 15:54 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Hi all, > > on the master branch I already commited: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=f6a16194d1348cb1c679acec5cd9e014ca3f3104 > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libre

Re: [Libreoffice] Some changes for the "Getting Involved

On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 11:30 -0500, spad...@sover.net wrote: > Hello, all > > I am just getting started with LibreOffice development, and was following > the instructions at . > I noticed that a couple of things should be added: > > On my Ubunt

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] [PUSHED] lp#696527 enabling Human icons theme in 3.3 branch

Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > If this patch gets accepted for 3.3, we likely can get rid of the > patch in the build repo, which I would consider a Good Thing(tm). > Looks good to me, cherry-picked for 3.3 - actual shipment of icons is controlled by the distro-config anyways. Cheers, -- Thorsten

[Libreoffice] [Bug 32894] [Task] LibreOffice 3.3.1 release blockers / stoppers

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32894 Rainer Bielefeld changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|32329 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][EasyHacks] Remove some use of svarray stuff in SwScriptInfo

The attached patch removes some more SvBytes and SvXub_StrLens usage from SwScriptInfo. Changes under LGPLv3+/MPL Nigel. >From bdbe75e3715a5e553c26edcefb09abff7ebf936b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nigel Hawkins Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 15:05:14 + Subject: [PATCH 4/4] Remove direction svArray

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Mac builds / lang-packs ...

Hi *, On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote: > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Michael Meeks > wrote: >> >>        Would it not be better in 3.4 (when we have solved the size issues) to >> have a single download (like Windows) that includes all the languages, > +1 > It is fine, O

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] [PUSHED] BorderLine fix

Caolan McNamara wrote: > > David fixed the BorderLine API problem a while ago with this commit > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=0d209ac289dd5c79da6950b4c01b0cec9b7fbe6d > > in master. > > > > I reviewed it and would be ok to cherry-pick it into 3.3.1 branch. Could

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] patch lib-core/eventattacher

Hi, it seems that the translations in ucb/source/sorter/sortresult.cxx didn't make their way. I've pushed them. Thank you for your contribution. Christina Rossmanith ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedes

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][EasyHacks] Remove some use of svarray stuff in SwScriptInfo

This patch removes the last use of SvBytes from SwScriptInfo. And should be the last usage in sw. Nigel >From 3d1e455ca3ede76235e769b65342f0f31d9f44ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nigel Hawkins Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 16:12:13 + Subject: [PATCH 5/5] Remove compression svArray usage from SwScr

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] [PUSHED] BorderLine fix

Caolan McNamara wrote: > > David fixed the BorderLine API problem a while ago with this commit > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=0d209ac289dd5c79da6950b4c01b0cec9b7fbe6d > > in master. > > > > I reviewed it and would be ok to cherry-pick it into 3.3.1 branch. Could

Re: [Libreoffice] LibO security

Michael Meeks wrote: > We could do worse than cutting / pasting / editing point two of: > http://people.gnome.org/~michael/blog/2011-02-04.html into the release > notes (or something). > Added a short notice, and a link to that blog post. Let's work on a more formal approach to this for the

Re: [Libreoffice] ure cppcheck, variableScope.

Hello, On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 23:48 -0300, Kayo Hamid wrote: > Hi guys, it's minor change, sending for review. I just pushed the patch. Thanks for the help, even if minor. Regards, -- Cédric Bosdonnat LibreOffice hacker http://documentfoundation.org OOo Eclipse Integration developer http://cedr

Re: [Libreoffice] FreeBSD support round2

2011/2/8 Baptiste Daroussin : > Hi, > > here is a new set of simple patches for freebsd. > > libs-gui-fix-spadmin set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH so be able to correctly > launch spadmin > bootstrap-cleanup-unx-fbsd.mk is inspired by openbsd, it is a huge > simplification of what was done before + it preve

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Remove bogus comments + bash line

Hi Guillaume, I just pushed all of them! Many thanks for your cleanup. Regards, On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 08:57 +0100, Guillaume Poussel wrote: > I have edited the wiki to show I'm currently working on it. > Please find attached again new patches to remove this comments. > > Regards, > Guillaume Po

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] ure cppcheck, variableScope.

On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 18:36 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > Hello, > > On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 23:48 -0300, Kayo Hamid wrote: > > Hi guys, it's minor change, sending for review. > > I just pushed the patch. Thanks for the help, even if minor. Oops, I forgot to tag it as pushed... fixed now. --

Re: [Libreoffice] Address Books

On 01/26/2011 05:41 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> for info: >> >> http://hg.services.openoffice.org/cws/dba34a/rev/d5b3bb5ca529 >> > Cherry-picked on master. > > -- Thorsten > Thorsten, I've just updated: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107809 SeaMon

Re: [Libreoffice] Address Books

Hi Gary, NoOp wrote (08-02-11 19:24) Thorsten, I've just updated: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107809 SeaMonkey address books were working in OOo m97& m98 but broke again in 3.3.0. I now get the exact same error in LO 3.3.0 m97 and m98 are from the master, after 330 was br

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: svtools/inc svtools/source

On Tuesday 08 of February 2011, Joseph Powers wrote: > New commits: > commit 27f2608c5d1deb6cfc8c7e56239563815588e015 > Author: Joseph Powers > Date: Tue Feb 8 06:55:57 2011 -0800 > > Remove DECLARE_LIST( ValueItemList, ValueSetItem* ) > > diff --git a/svtools/inc/svtools/valueset.hxx > b/sv

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] remove old icon themes ...

On Sunday 06 of February 2011, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 12:58 +0100, Andreas Proschofsky wrote: > > Just to chime in here: Setting --with-theme does nothing for me, LO > > builds all icon sets, no matter what I ask it to... > > Right ;-) they should all be

Re: [Libreoffice] Address Books

On 02/08/2011 10:36 AM, Cor Nouws wrote: > Hi Gary, > > NoOp wrote (08-02-11 19:24) >> Thorsten, I've just updated: >> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107809 >> SeaMonkey address books were working in OOo m97& m98 but broke again in >> 3.3.0. I now get the exact same error in LO

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] patch lib-core/eventattacher

Hi, there were more patches not yet pushed, so I've applied them. I didn't touch the files which differed only by whitespace. And I didn't delete comments containing bugids and text. This I would like to leave for the experts :-) The not yet applied patchfile is appended. Christina diff --

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice default UI font need to be changed

On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 17:34 +0700, Samphan Raruenrom wrote: > Glyph fallback for CTL text in Windows is currently broken but "only" > for UI text rendering, not for text in the document. Search for WinGlyphFallbackSubstititution in vcl/win for the windows specific glyph substitution stuff. There a

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] patch lib-core/eventattacher

Hello Christina, On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 21:04 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote: > there were more patches not yet pushed, so I've applied them. I didn't > touch the files which differed only by whitespace. And I didn't delete > comments containing bugids and text. This I would like to leave for t

Re: [Libreoffice] How to make cell with list data validation, a combo box

On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 19:46 +0530, Kishan Bhat wrote: > Hello, > > I've been trying to make a combobox for a cell with Data Validation > > List for LibreOffice calc. > > I thought I could add that in the source and try out - so I downloaded > LO source and started greping for text, all thanks to

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: SmNodeToTextVisitor Fixes

Hello Jonas, Michael, list, Sorry for not replying sooner. On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 19:32 +0100, Jonas Finnemann Jensen wrote: > I don't think it's critial... None of the commits that removes > brackets and improves SmNodeToTextVisitor have been applied to > libreoffice-3-3... The SmNodeToTextVisito

Re: [Libreoffice] Who do I know when a patch will make it to a release

On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 14:35 +0700, Samphan Raruenrom wrote: > The intention for my original post is two fold:- > 1) I'd like to know when/which-version will this fix land in. Definitely 3.4 anyway. *maybe* a 3.3.X > 2) I'd like to understand the policy for development vs. release > branches. For

Re: [Libreoffice] Easy hack patch!

On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 11:59 -0500, spad...@sover.net wrote: > Now with fewer blank lines! Thanks for this, unluckily though someone else got to it just before you :-) C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freede

Re: [Libreoffice] Easy hack patch!

Gna, sorry for this. Didn't update the wiki page, as these clean up was incidendental to some other cleaning. I'll update the wiki page. Thomas On 02/08/2011 09:56 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 11:59 -0500, spad...@sover.net wrote: >> Now with fewer blank lines! > > Thanks f

Re: [Libreoffice] Reusing the GLib mainloop from GTK/GNOME integration

Hi Alberto, On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 17:47 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote: > I am working on exporting the menubar menu items structure through a > DBus service, you can check my progress this the bzr branch I am > working on[0]. Wonderful :-) but why are you doing this as an extension ? :-) sure

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: FreeBSD support round2

On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 11:29 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi, > > here is a new set of simple patches for freebsd. > > libs-gui-fix-spadmin set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH so be able to correctly > launch spadmin libs-gui: b5eb853f93d79c4204169903aa6d2a420eb6d7ce > libs-core-fix-unopkg.sh add Free

Re: [Libreoffice] Strange Shared object xxx not found errors

On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 19:35 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > My builds are now crashing in the same way in a few modules; pyuno is one of > them. > --enable-new-dtags ... > > The library is present in /usr/pkg/lib/libpython2.6.so.1.0 > When I run the command by hand in a shell, there's no error an

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Mac builds / lang-packs ...

Hi Christian, On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 16:46 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Michael Meeks > > wrote: > >>Would it not be better in 3.4 (when we have solved the size issues) > >> to > >> have a si

Re: [Libreoffice] lots of fallback icons shown in menus

Hi Caolan, On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 15:05 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > So my GNOME settings are by default to not show icons in menus so I > didn't notice that we show a placeholder graphic for all missing icons > in menus. Oooh ! :-) that is only on master I hope :-) > Do we think that

Re: [Libreoffice] Easy hack patch!

Now that easy hack is done :) On 02/08/2011 10:03 PM, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > Gna, sorry for this. Didn't update the wiki page, as these clean up was > incidendental to some other cleaning. I'll update the wiki page. > > Thomas > > On 02/08/2011 09:56 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: >> On Sun, 2011-0

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove obsolete Hyperlink Bar from calc

Hi, Please find attached patch that removes the Hyperlink Bar from calc (made available under LGPLv3+/MPL). Patch has been rebased with origin/master and compiled before submission. I've started removing the references to the Hyperlink Bar from the apps. Once that's done I'll remove the implem

[Libreoffice] translated parts of German comment in svtools/inc/ruler.hxx

Hello, this patch is LGPLv3+/MPL. Greetings, Tobias >From e38102f749d242152d0ada7e50405d7833b5acb8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tobias Rosenberger Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 22:51:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] translated parts of German comment in svtools/inc/ruler.hxx --- svtools/inc/ruler.hxx | 235

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Mac builds / lang-packs ...

Hi Michael, *, On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 16:46 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Nguyen Vu Hung >> wrote: >> > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Michael Meeks >> > wrote: >[...] >> The counter-question to that

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Mac builds / lang-packs ...

Hello, just for the sake of this discussion, how big is the MSO installation for OS X? Maybe someone can check, I am not using it. If LO dmg will grow to 350Mb or 400Mb (with help in all languages) probably that is still not so bad compared to the full dmg of MSO. I understand not everyone has f

[Libreoffice] Issue in Base

Hi Guys&Girls Bugzilla query returns "zarro boogs" so hence my question: is anyone aware of the bug in base wrt tool bars for report building? See users list http://www.mail-archive.com/users@libreoffice.org/msg02099.html Thanks, Cor -- - giving openoffice.org its foundation :: The Docume

[Libreoffice] [Bug 32894] [Task] LibreOffice 3.3.1 release blockers / stoppers

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32894 --- Comment #17 from Cor Nouws 2011-02-08 15:58:50 PST --- Suggesting bug 33970 . Crash with roaming profiles of course is a no-go for our business users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You ar

[Libreoffice] Some help for LibreOffice testing with ODF ?

Hi all, OpenDoc Society writes us with a request to join in for Officeshots. The system that makes it possible to easily test our output against ODF etc. Since I think the best change to find someone to help with this little task is this list, I quote the mail: Quote: " before the next plu

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Removed unused functions and classes from calc 3last

Hi Alfonso, On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 19:08 +, Alfonso Eusebio wrote: > Please notice that this patch removes three entire classes: > ScSummableCompressedArray, ScVbaCharts and ScVbaSeriesCollection. > For the last two classes the corresponding .cxx and .hxx files have been > removed. Yup, tha

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [Pushed] refactoring gendict

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Kenneth Venken wrote: > > I think i've implemented all the suggestions. There's one hard coded limit > (i < 0x1FFF) i don't get. Why isn't it 0x2000 since existMark has a size of > 0x1. I changed it to i < 0x2000. This will not have an influence on > xdictionar

Re: [Libreoffice] Fw: [PATCH] Removed unused functions and classes from calc 3last

On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 10:59 +, Alfonso Eusebio wrote: > Hi, > > Could somebody advise if the patch below is acceptable or if I should change > it > somehow? I've answered your earlier post. Sorry I was away at FOSDEM in the past 5 days. Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Remove obsolete Hyperlink Bar from calc

Hi Alfonso, On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 21:41 +, Alfonso Eusebio wrote: > Please find attached patch that removes the Hyperlink Bar from calc (made > available under LGPLv3+/MPL). > Patch has been rebased with origin/master and compiled before submission. Looks all good. Pushed. > I've started r

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] translated parts of German comment in svtools/inc/ruler.hxx

On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 23:15 +0100, Tobias Rosenberger wrote: > this patch is LGPLv3+/MPL. Thanks! Pushed. -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] patch translating comments

Looks like someone has already applied this patch. Setting [PUSHED] tag in the subject line. -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libre

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Get rid of SvBytes/SvSvULongs in SwUndoDelNum

On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 09:35 +, Nigel Hawkins wrote: > On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 23:31 +0300, Andrey Turkin wrote: > > So that would be the next step? Should I squash the two patches and > > resubmit > > it? > > Hopefully, Michael or somebody will push the pair of them. I did push both patches f

Re: [Libreoffice] Fwd: [tdf-discuss] Problem with linking external sheets in CALC

On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 20:19 +0700, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote: > Hi OP and Kohei-san, > > FYI, consider this as a nasty hack or a bug? Well, if the sheet name of an external document changes, of course it will break links. Nothing we can do about that. > Is there any faster way how to update these br

Re: [Libreoffice] Fwd: [tdf-discuss] Problem with linking external sheets in CALC

On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 23:16 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 20:19 +0700, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote: > > Hi OP and Kohei-san, > > > > FYI, consider this as a nasty hack or a bug? > > Well, if the sheet name of an external document changes, of course it > will break links. Nothing w

[Libreoffice] re-enable icons on Linux for KDE

On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 20:43 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote: > On Sunday 06 of February 2011, Michael Meeks wrote: > > Right ;-) they should all be built, and delivered into the solver, but > > only the ones you specify should be bundled > > Does that mean you have broken KDE integration with that

[Libreoffice] adding easy hacks ...

On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 23:05 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks#Allow_copy_and_paste_of_multiple_ranges > Added to Easy Hacks page. So - to make it truly 'Easy' - an easy hack needs more than this - IMHO. Particularly, for an expert addi

Re: [Libreoffice] Breaking in sw: error: expected template-name before '<' token

Hi David, On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 15:06 -0800, David Dumaresq wrote: > I'm getting, first, warnings about declarations that have been previously > defined. > "warning: this is the location of the previous definition" That is fairly normal :-) > and finally a number of errors abou

Re: [Libreoffice] Wiki Development/Code Overview

Hi Christoph, On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 23:32 +0100, Christoph Herzog wrote: > I've made some changes to the hierarchical structure of the page and > added an alphabetical list of directories&repositories in clone/. Please > check whether I'm taking the right direction. Ooh :-) looks nice -

[Libreoffice] extending Easy Hacks with bugs ...

Hi Rainer, So - I'm concerned that our easy hacks page is getting burned away rather rapidly; and I wonder - would it be good to have a set of "easy bugs" - perhaps with a suitable tag, so we can have a generic query that people can poke at to find things to fix. We have a lot of these (I

Re: [Libreoffice] which bugids to keep (was: [PUSHED] patch lib-core/eventattacher)

Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 21:04 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote: > > there were more patches not yet pushed, so I've applied them. I didn't > > touch the files which differed only by whitespace. And I didn't delete > > comments containing bugids and text. This I would like

Re: [Libreoffice] Issue in Base

Cor Nouws wrote: > Bugzilla query returns "zarro boogs" so hence my question: is anyone > aware of the bug in base wrt tool bars for report building? > See users list > http://www.mail-archive.com/users@libreoffice.org/msg02099.html > Hi Cor, at least I'm not - so better file a bug for it. I'd ra

Re: [Libreoffice] Some help for LibreOffice testing with ODF ?

Cor Nouws wrote: > Quote: > " before the next plugfest it would be really useful if someone > from the LibreOffice community would set up a copy of LibreOffice > for Officeshots.org (ideally on multiple platforms and both a trunk > version and a release, but lets start with the basics). This is no

[Libreoffice] Improvement LibreOffice

Dear Sirs, I am a user of open source software. I am also a writer and using LibreOffice having trouble with layout of books. There are specialized programs: Adobe PageMaker, Adobe InDesign, Microsoft Publisher. Given the above I ask you to consider developing a similar product in the LibreOff

Re: [Libreoffice] extending Easy Hacks with bugs ...

Michael Meeks wrote: > Is there some standard keyword we could use for this ? of course, I'd > really only want developers adding that keyword - when they have added > some suitable code pointers to make it truly 'easy' :-) > Hi Michael, Rainer, I believe we implicitely already do that - I

Re: [Libreoffice] Strange Shared object xxx not found errors

On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 09:30:56PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 19:35 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > My builds are now crashing in the same way in a few modules; pyuno is one of > > them. > > > --enable-new-dtags ... > > > > The library is present in /usr/pkg/lib/libpy