On 10/12/2010 Petr Mladek wrote:
> OOo has only 5 days, see
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Release_criteria#Stopper_issues
> How is it there with building and approving the national builds?
As shown in the page you link, it's "5 days including a weekend", so the
constraints proposed by
Hi Alex,
On 2010-12-11 at 12:19 +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> > I have heard quite some complaints about the missing native language
> > versions already; I am not sure I've explained it well enough
> > previously, but this testing is blocking it. So please - help me :-)
> >
>
> Any chanc
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 20:26 -0800, Joseph Powers wrote:
> I played around in writer a little bit but couldn't figure out where
> this code was being used. If someone could point me in the right
> direction, I'll do a little more testing.
Quite possibly it is simply not used :-) I guess, c
Hi Jerry,
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 19:53 -0500, Jerry Shi wrote:
> Hi, I'm new to opensource, so tell me if I'm asking very stupid
> questions, but,
Your questions seem sensible, and welcome to open-source (or Free
Software ;-).
> * Where is bin/g? I can't find it anywhere, and it se
Le 11/12/2010 10:01, Jean-Baptiste Faure a écrit :
> Le 06/12/2010 17:04, Jan Holesovsky a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am sorry - I promised the LibO online help (WikiHelp) already the last
>> week, but it haven't happened; it needed more work than anticipated :-(
>>
>> Either way, the good news is that
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 22:50 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 01:49:37PM +, Caolán McNamara
> wrote:
> > I think its a tool that fs built to get a graphical view of module
> > dependencies ?. But it was never fixed to be 64bit clean, right ?, so
> > not built on x86_64 anyw
Hi Sophie,
On 2010-12-11 at 14:35 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote:
> > I have heard quite some complaints about the missing native language
> > versions already; I am not sure I've explained it well enough
> > previously, but this testing is blocking it. So please - help me :-)
>
> I've search for
Hi Sophie & all,
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 14:35 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote:
> I've search for your explanation on our list but didn't find them.
> Currently we (the localizer team) do not want the localized help to be
> uploaded on the wiki until we know about the localization process that
> will be
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 13:57 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> So at least we can get the name of the "missing" symbol
..
> There's some broken dependency somewhere and something isn't getting
> rebuilt.
I have a build broken in this way here, and will dig at / fix the
dependency issues late
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
On 2010-12-11 at 10:01 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> I can't find any wiki page which explain this project. Does such
> web-page exists ? If not, I think such should be created as a reference.
Good idea, I've created it now based on the mail to Sophie; and sorry
that I ha
Hi Arno,
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 18:56 -0500, Arno Teigseth wrote:
> I'm looking at a very old bug in openoffice that irritated me a lot:
> "Drag-filling in an autofiltered list also fills hidden cells"
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89232
Oh - this might make a nice
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
On 2010-12-13 at 11:02 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> What about security ? How can you protect WikiHelp against vandalism and
> spam if everybody is allowed to update this on-line help ? It seems it
> is not so easy if you consider the wiki of OOo.
So far the accounts are
I have one suggestion and I have seen this on the Ubuntu wiki.
When any editing is done on a page its emailed to a team, in this case
the wiki team, and they check it for formatting so its consistent as
well as the content.
On 12/13/2010 11:46 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
On
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 10:32 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 13:57 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > So at least we can get the name of the "missing" symbol
> ..
> > There's some broken dependency somewhere and something isn't getting
> > rebuilt.
FWIW it *might* be a .a, if an
Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 18:56 -0500, Arno Teigseth wrote:
> > I'm looking at a very old bug in openoffice that irritated me a lot:
> > "Drag-filling in an autofiltered list also fills hidden cells"
> > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89232
>
> Oh - this
Hi,
ah, I have somehow missed this mail.
Sophie Gautier píše v Ne 05. 12. 2010 v 20:49 +0300:
> Hi Andrea, all,
> On 05/12/2010 20:39, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> > On 26/11/2010 Petr Mladek wrote:
> >> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria
> >> Feel free to update it or propose improv
Hi Michael, :-)
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 18:24, Michael Meeks wrote:
> So - there is no need to open the wiki for editing ever, if that is a
> huge problem for people, and certainly we don't have to do this for 3.3,
> and certainly we don't have to open the wiki so just anyone can turn up
>
Hi Peter,
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 17:20 +0100, Peter Jentsch wrote:
> I'll have a look at libxslt and try to add support for libxslt to
> XSLTFilter.cxx. I the long run I guess it'll be desirable to let XSLT
> filter components tell XSLTFilter wether they want saxon9 / XSLT2.0 or
> not using an addi
Hello
Please permit me to express certain personal issues I do not know if I might
receive helps from you of course my subject might appear so sudden but please
consider this as a wish and accept my mail with a deep sense of humility
I lost my father about some months ago; I and my sister are A
Hi Kendy,
First, thanks for your answer:
On 13/12/2010 13:20, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Sophie,
On 2010-12-11 at 14:35 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote:
I have heard quite some complaints about the missing native language
versions already; I am not sure I've explained it well enough
previously, but
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 11:35 +0100, Gert Faller wrote:
> it seems that the RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM is (completly ? mostly ?)
> finished so I'm back to PDF Export
Oh - wow :-) great work. Did we remove it as an easy-hack, and move it
to the completed hacks section, so other people don't
Last two patches to remove these macros.
Andy>From d754de30bcc8ed04bfce96336be71b0e710a8765 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Holder
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 14:51:41 +
Subject: [PATCH] Change unnamespaced file.hxx macros
---
l10ntools/source/help/HelpLinker.cxx |2 +-
toolkit/sour
On 13/12/2010 13:57, Petr Mladek wrote:
Hi,
ah, I have somehow missed this mail.
Sophie Gautier píše v Ne 05. 12. 2010 v 20:49 +0300:
Hi Andrea, all,
On 05/12/2010 20:39, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 26/11/2010 Petr Mladek wrote:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria
Feel free to
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 12:27 +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> So you see, it might not be entirely hopeless after all.
Oh - exactly ! :-) and it would be good to remove that hostile junk
header with apparent Sun ownership claim anyway. Good stuff.
So - please do poke him (gently
Hi Michael,
On 13/12/2010 13:24, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Sophie& all,
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 14:35 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote:
I've search for your explanation on our list but didn't find them.
Currently we (the localizer team) do not want the localized help to be
uploaded on the wiki until we
Lior Kaplan wrote:
> Could we import changes made in the PDF import extension ?
>
> See http://hg.services.openoffice.org/cws/pdfextfix04
>
Yep, makes sense - if someone could second this, I'll commit it to
-3-3.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpe1Z2XnBMLJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 18:57 +0800, David Nelson wrote:
> Personally, I like the idea of editing the help on the wiki rather than
> offline.
> But could the problem be solved by creating a user group on the wiki and
> only allowing editing rights for that group's users? Then we could add
> select
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 10:32 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 13:57 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > So at least we can get the name of the "missing" symbol
> ...
> > There's some broken dependency somewhere and something isn't getting
> > rebuilt.
It turns out this was
Hi Thorsten,
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 12:57 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Lior Kaplan wrote:
> > Could we import changes made in the PDF import extension ?
> > See http://hg.services.openoffice.org/cws/pdfextfix04
> >
> Yep, makes sense - if someone could second this, I'll commit it to
> -3-3.
Hi there,
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 18:49 +0100, Joachim wrote:
> Here is a patch that removes the placeholder icons in default_images/res.
Great - I pushed it :-)
> There are still such icons in ooo_custom_images, I'll send a patch later.
Really ? I'd not expect to see them there;
Regardless if its spam posting or editing of a pages its all moderated
so if there is spam its automatically denied. also they have it to where
you have to have a login to be able to do any editing. CAPTCHA can also
help mitigate spam and bots when users sign up to be able to do any
editing of
Hi Kendy,
Le 13/12/2010 11:37, Jan Holesovsky a écrit :
> Hi Jean-Baptiste,
>
> On 2010-12-11 at 10:01 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
>> I can't find any wiki page which explain this project. Does such
>> web-page exists ? If not, I think such should be created as a reference.
> Good idea, I've
Hi Sophie,
On 2010-12-13 at 14:05 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote:
> > I have subscribed to the l10n mailing list just on Friday, after I
> > learned that there were some discussions there I was not aware of until
> > then.
>
> This is the list for the people doing the work you're currently
> remov
Hi all,
Hopefully someone can help out here. I've been attempting my first build
on MacOSX and the build fails in soltools trying to make mdepend :
../unxmacxi.pro/misc/make_makedepend.makedepend_1.cmd: line 1: -n:
command not found
dmake: Error code 127, while making '../unxmacxi.pro/bin/makede
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
On 2010-12-13 at 14:11 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Wikihelp
> >
> Thank you for this wiki page about WikiHelp. I will contribute with
> questions and suggestions.
Great, thank you!
> For now, I am not sure that everybody
Hi Sophie,
I am sorry for missing this mail :-( Please cc: me explicitly the next
time.
On 2010-12-08 at 14:34 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote:
> So, some inputs from the localizer point of view concerning the help files.
> Currently, it's not available else than on line and in English, which is
>
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
Jean-Baptiste Faure píše v Pá 10. 12. 2010 v 20:02 +0100:
> Hi Petr, all,
>
> Le 10/12/2010 15:24, Petr Mladek a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > Jean has modified http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria
> > and increased the number of days for reporting blocker bugs from 7 t
Hi guys,
On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 20:49 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote:
> On 05/12/2010 20:39, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> > So a major change with respect to the OpenOffice.org release process
> > would be that no explicit approval is needed for localized versions.
Right. I do not believe we can
On 13/12/10 11:34, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 12:27 +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
>> So you see, it might not be entirely hopeless after all.
> Oh - exactly ! :-) and it would be good to remove that hostile junk
> header with apparent Sun ownership claim anyway. Good stuf
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 11:45 +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> These are all valid solutions, but they will not help for the quality of
> the first (3.3) release, which will be rather important. Maybe a
> solution for the Microsoft Windows package could be to put in the
> "smaller" multi-language ins
Hi Wols,
Le 13/12/10 15:05, Wols Lists a écrit :
> I've had a reply from him. Sadly he didn't (didn't even say if he could)
> relicence it, but he said it was abandonware. It was last worked on
> about the time OOo went to 3.0, and sqlite went to 3.0 too. Christian
> moved on to the JDBC and ODB
Andrea Pescetti píše v Ne 12. 12. 2010 v 19:30 +0100:
> On 10/12/2010 Petr Mladek wrote:
> > OOo has only 5 days, see
> > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Release_criteria#Stopper_issues
> > How is it there with building and approving the national builds?
>
> As shown in the page you link,
On 13/12/10 10:57, David Nelson wrote:
> Personally, I like the idea of editing the help on the wiki rather than
> offline.
> But could the problem be solved by creating a user group on the wiki and
> only allowing editing rights for that group's users? Then we could add
> selected
> devs, i10n a
Hi Petr,
Just jumping to the last part about tests,
On 13/12/2010 17:04, Petr Mladek wrote:
[...]
Just to get better picture. How much time would you need to finish all
known manual tests?
You may not know but I've translated (from our German friends) some
tests for 3.3 QA here:
http://wik
Hi Caolán,
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 21:05:38 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> This is good stuff, I didn't push this yet though. There's one little
> easily-fixed snag I think, e.g.
>
> - else if ( aArgStr.CompareToAscii( "-psn", 4 ) == COMPARE_EQUAL )
> + else if
> ( aArg.equalsIgnoreAsciiCaseAsciiL(
On 13/12/10 14:17, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
>> I've seen a couple of things about sqlite *2* that implies it's not a
>> > particularly friendly database. 3 may well be an improvement. But
>> > anyways, once we've got sqlite in place I'm then going to try and write
>> > an engine for LO. That'll be
Renaming the executables from s*.exe to l*.exe has been discussed and apart
from the differentiation of office suites it has a practical implication for
Windows users:
An extension (e.g. ods) is associated with an exe file (e.g. scalc.exe). If
the user has installed OpenOffice AND LibreOffice, th
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 10:13 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 22:50 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 01:49:37PM +, Caolán McNamara
> > wrote:
> > > I think its a tool that fs built to get a graphical view of module
> > > dependencies ?. But it was nev
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 10:31 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> I'll work on removing this module later today.
Remove it from the solenv/unx/*.mk list of "modules with warnings that
should be ignored while you're at it.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreO
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 15:33 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 10:31 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > I'll work on removing this module later today.
>
> Remove it from the solenv/unx/*.mk list of "modules with warnings that
> should be ignored while you're at it.
Roger that.
--
On 13/12/10 14:52, Takeshi Abe wrote:
>> p.s. I think we should have a wiki page to list the old String methods
>> > and the new OUString equivalents side-by-side with snags listed. (Some
>> > of the String methods are sort of OUStringBuffer equivalents, and some
>> > are hard to do with OUStrings,
Andrea Pescetti píše v So 11. 12. 2010 v 11:45 +0100:
> On 06/12/2010 Petr Mladek wrote:
> > Andrea Pescetti píše v Ne 05. 12. 2010 v 18:39 +0100:
> > > So a major change with respect to the OpenOffice.org release process
> > > would be that no explicit approval is needed for localized versions.
>
Hi All,
Any chance that someone could have a look at that?
Thanks,
Camille
On 10/12/2010 23:10, camille wrote:
> Dear LibO devs,
>
> Please find attached a tentative patch for my own Easy Hack described
> below.
>
> The problem :
>
> Default color for native tables in Impress is blue. Most p
Hi all,
recently I've been looking at fdo#31716 and have found out that the
reading of help indexes that seems to cause the slowdown serves to no
purpose, because the result is then just ignored. To be more precise,
the result is assigned (through SfxMenuControl::Bind) to
SfxMenuControl::aHelpText
camille wrote:
> Please find attached a tentative patch for my own Easy Hack described
> below.
>
Thanks camille, looks good & is a sensible approach. Committed to
-3-3.
Keep the patches coming! :)
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpd77dGGctLp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
Marc Paré wrote:
> I'm helping out with the "Features list" for the upcoming
> LibreOffice v. 3.3 as found on this page:
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/LibOReleaseEvents/LOPressKit/FeatureList3.3
> . Sophie was kind enough to help with the initial list. Is there a
> place where a l
Marc Paré wrote:
> I'm helping out with the "Features list" for the upcoming
> LibreOffice v. 3.3 as found on this page:
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/LibOReleaseEvents/LOPressKit/FeatureList3.3
> . Sophie was kind enough to help with the initial list. Is there a
> place where a l
Le 2010-12-13 14:34, Thorsten Behrens a écrit :
Marc Paré wrote:
I'm helping out with the "Features list" for the upcoming
LibreOffice v. 3.3 as found on this page:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/LibOReleaseEvents/LOPressKit/FeatureList3.3
. Sophie was kind enough to help with the
Hello,
Here's a patch for testtools
Julien.
(LGPLv3+ / MPL)
commit 454a035958ee250cfc302967d5e936e0c634e746
Author: serval
Date: Mon Dec 13 21:36:13 2010 +0100
RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for testtools
diff --git a/testtools/source/bridgetest/multi.hxx
b/testtools/source/bridgetest/mul
Hi,
Here are some various cppcheck cleanup in vcl.
Incidentally, while checking for one ccpcheck warning I have found a
duplicate definition and implementation of two classes:
PspSalInfoPrinter and PspSalPrinter are defined both in vcl/unx/inc/salprn.h
and vcl/unx/headless/svpprn.hxx
The implemen
With the patch it's better...
Le 13 décembre 2010 21:41, Joachim Trémouroux
a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Here are some various cppcheck cleanup in vcl.
>
> Incidentally, while checking for one ccpcheck warning I have found a
> duplicate definition and implementation of two classes:
> PspSalInfoPrinter and
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 11:10 +, Andy Holder wrote:
> Last two patches to remove these macros.
Looks good, pushed. Thanks for this.
Is that the last use of those macros ?, is so you can move it from the
Easy Hacks to the completed section on the wiki.
C.
__
Hello,
Remove call-catcher / bloat removal with ScCellRangesBase of sc.
Compiling sc was ok.
Julien
(LGPLv3+ / MPL)
commit 3d43e48f2ce30615a33ca3cc3e5b634a7893b02f
Author: serval
Date: Mon Dec 13 22:06:35 2010 +0100
Remove callcatcher for ScCellRangesBase
diff --git a/sc/inc/cellsuno.hx
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 23:52 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote:
> So I amend my patch as attached
Looks good to me, pushed, thanks for this. Nice to see some UniStrings
and ByteStrings bite the dust.
As an aside, there is plenty of code that started off with char*, got
changed to "String" which was then th
Hi Gioele,
I got the message that xslt processing should be done by libxml/libxslt
not by xalan. Because I'm new to libxml, I first need to have closer
look at libxslts transformation API (and how to use that from LO, which
brings it's own xml processing API). Currently it looks as if it could
be
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 21:37 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here's a patch for testtools
Looks good to me, pushed, thanks for this. Can't be too many of these
left to do, is there ?
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop
While trying to build LibreOffice for the first time I found
out doccomp.cxx didn't compile. Looks like a recent patch
intended to change a function definition but forgot to adjust
the declaration.
It's a simple patch. The file now compiles.
Octavio Alvarez (1):
sw: doccomp.cxx type mismatch bu
Commit 84a19491 broke sw build by forgetting to change ULONG to size_t on
::SetIndex, as it appears from the rest of the diff.
---
sw/source/core/doc/doccomp.cxx |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sw/source/core/doc/doccomp.cxx b/sw/source/core/doc/doccomp.cx
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 21:41 +0100, Joachim Trémouroux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are some various cppcheck cleanup in vcl.
>
> Incidentally, while checking for one ccpcheck warning I have found a
> duplicate definition and implementation of two classes:
> PspSalInfoPrinter and PspSalPrinter are define
Hi there,
I'd like to port a patch to the libreoffice-3-3 branch to ignore
preceding and trailing spaces in cells during csv import. The change is
already committed on master, and the attached is the total difference
against the current libreoffice-3-3 branch. The change on master
consists of se
Hi Michael,
I'm from Germany, where XSLT at least currently is slightly more popular
than COBOL.
http://www.google.com/trends?q=COBOL%2C
+XSLT&ctab=0&geo=de&geor=all&date=all&sort=0
I guess you're right about XSLT 2.0 being at bit underdetermined though.
Cheers,
Peter
Am Montag, den 13.12.
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 21:42 +0100, Joachim Trémouroux wrote:
> With the patch it's better...
Looks good. Mostly the scoping ones and assigned but unused warnings, as
far as I can see. Pushed now, thanks for this.
Just watch out for some of the cppcheck warnings, a few here and there
are false pos
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 13:14 -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
> Commit 84a19491 broke sw build by forgetting to change ULONG to size_t on
> ::SetIndex, as it appears from the rest of the diff.
That's the right fix, but Joseph Powers bet you to the punch and
committed his equivalent fix already :-)
C.
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 22:09 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Remove call-catcher / bloat removal with ScCellRangesBase of sc.
> Compiling sc was ok.
Yup, agreed, pushed this. Thanks, another small step towards smaller
binaries and less code to maintain :-)
C.
__
Hi Cor,
I totally missed to answer your mail ... kudos to the little red
exclamation mark (but, not within the status bar, of course *g*).
Am Dienstag, den 07.12.2010, 13:34 +0100 schrieb Cor Nouws:
> Hi again,
>
> (after a short lunch, a second thought ;-) )
Well, as I said, I had some in the
Petr Mladek wrote:
> The testing by volunteers is really appreciated. We would not be able to
> release without it. People would not use LibO if there are bugs in the
> basic functionality.
> Just to get idea? How much time would you need to make 99% normal users
> happy? It means that you need not
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:30:50 +0100, Peter Jentsch wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I'm from Germany, where XSLT at least currently is slightly more popular
> than COBOL.
But compared to, say, python, both are just background noise :)
http://www.google.com/trends?q=COBOL%2C+XSLT%2C+python&ctab=0&geo=d
Alright, thanks for all the help so far. To answer your questions, I'm
using openSuse 11.2, on a fairly new dual core laptop. Um...about the
dependencies...I went to the repository for openSuse and installed both
build and bootstrap, but I'm not quite sure that was the right thing to do,
which br
Nevermind that bit about it not existing. I forgot built-in libraries. I'm
still not sure why the assert would fail though...
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Jerry Shi wrote:
> Alright, thanks for all the help so far. To answer your questions, I'm
> using openSuse 11.2, on a fairly new dual
Alright, so I just got off of irc.freenode.net, and now have another
question. For some odd reason, make fetch does not work. It gives me an
error, make: nothing to be done for 'fetch', which stumped the person I was
chatting with. Any ideas?
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Jerry Shi wrote:
nevermind, being pretty stupid now...Disregard the last email.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Jerry Shi wrote:
> Alright, so I just got off of irc.freenode.net, and now have another
> question. For some odd reason, make fetch does not work. It gives me an
> error, make: nothing to be done fo
So, just one more thing before I go do something else...is it fine if I
exclude modules? I got around the nss thing by disabling it when I was
running ./autogen.sh. Now, I have an error in graphite where "CPU you
selected does not support x86-64 instruction set" I do have a 64 bit
computer, as I
Hi Joost,
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 12:19 +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote:
> Hereby additional patch with:
>
> * Check on pName is NULL.
>
> * Showing original sheet name in input box, when Rename option is
> checked.
>
> Not implemented: OrgName_#.
Ok. I've finished my review & followup work to gi
On Mon Dec 13 2010 20:53:22 GMT-0800 (PST) Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Hi Joost,
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 12:19 +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote:
Hereby additional patch with:
* Check on pName is NULL.
* Showing original sheet name in input box, when Rename option is
checked.
Not implemented: OrgName_#.
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 23:53 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Hi Joost,
>
> On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 12:19 +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote:
>
> > Hereby additional patch with:
> >
> > * Check on pName is NULL.
> >
> > * Showing original sheet name in input box, when Rename option is
> > checked.
> >
> >
Caolán McNamara said:
> On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 21:32 +0800, imacat wrote:
> Hmm, it would seem so. What I would suggest, is to remove that empty
> clone/l10n dir. In a fresh shell do the ./autogen.sh --with=languages
> again and ./download steps again and see if that l10n dir is created
> again, but
I found where this code is used: Writer -> Insert -> Indexes and Tables ->
Indexes and Tables -> Entries.
Currently I can't build due to a non-related issue so I can't trouble shoot it.
My git foo is also bad enough that I can't figure out how to remove it...
Needless to say, my patch causes a
Hi Andy,
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 21:06 -0800, Andy Brown wrote:
> I would like to thank you guys. This will be great. :) Any idea when
> we will see it in action?
Well, since this just landed on master, I would say it'll be in the next
major version after 3.3maybe 3.4?
Just a guess.
Kohei
Hi all,
I've put some reflexions on how to handle the help files taking into
account each team needs on the discussion page opened by Kendy yesterday
[1].
The proposal I made is to handle the en_US file on the wiki to let the
documentation team take care of it and remove the hurdle of editin
89 matches
Mail list logo
