Hi Michael, I'm from Germany, where XSLT at least currently is slightly more popular than COBOL.
http://www.google.com/trends?q=COBOL%2C +XSLT&ctab=0&geo=de&geor=all&date=all&sort=0 I guess you're right about XSLT 2.0 being at bit underdetermined though. Cheers, Peter Am Montag, den 13.12.2010, 11:04 +0000 schrieb Michael Meeks: > Hi Peter, > > On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 17:20 +0100, Peter Jentsch wrote: > > I'll have a look at libxslt and try to add support for libxslt to > > XSLTFilter.cxx. I the long run I guess it'll be desirable to let XSLT > > filter components tell XSLTFilter wether they want saxon9 / XSLT2.0 or > > not using an additional attribute in USERDATA. > > It'd be great to have your experience there, so we can work out what to > do about XSLT2.0 (which supposedly is a frankenstein of a language > anyway). Incidentally, XSLT is (still) trending below COBOL: > > http://www.google.com/trends?q=COBOL%2C+XSLT > > It'd be great to work closely with Gioele - since you will share the > requirement of not using the existing Java code to flatten the ODF to a > single XML file. > > Thanks for looking into this though ! > > HTH, > > Michael. > _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
