Andrea Pescetti píše v So 11. 12. 2010 v 11:45 +0100: > On 06/12/2010 Petr Mladek wrote: > > Andrea Pescetti píše v Ne 05. 12. 2010 v 18:39 +0100: > > > So a major change with respect to the OpenOffice.org release process > > > would be that no explicit approval is needed for localized versions. > > ... I understand your concerns. We came with the central build because of > > the many advantages: > > + translators do not need to fight with technical problems > > + save space (do not duplicate binaries) > > + packaging is standardized, compatible, ... > > Yes, these are clear advantages from the infrastructure point of view. > > > I have several ideas how to solve the above problem: > > + do smoke test of each localization to make sure that it starts > > at least; we should do it anyway > > + do more and more frequent bug fix releases with only safe and > > critical fixes; it is a bit questionable because of resources > > + allow to later update just a single localization > > These are all valid solutions, but they will not help for the quality of > the first (3.3) release, which will be rather important.
Sure. I see that LO-3.3 will be a kind of special as well ;-) OOo-3.3-rc8 is delayed. They moved the the final release to January. We are going to create LO-3.3-rc2 tag (most likely tomorrow) and provide newer builds with the Windows help packs, ... I am pretty sure that we will need rc3 to integrate more fixes from OOo-3.3-rc8, ... It means that the LO-3.3 release is going to slip to January as well. It should give you more time for testing... Best Regards, Petr _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
