On 12.3.2022 19.12, Ahmed Abdelatty Mohamed Radalla wrote:
Greetings,
I am trying to build LibreOffice on Windows using LODE. I installed the
prerequisites (MSVC & JDK) and then followed the instructions on the
wiki. When it was time to build, I got this error:
checking the dependency genera
Greetings,I am trying to build LibreOffice on Windows using LODE. I installed the prerequisites (MSVC & JDK) and then followed the instructions on the wiki. When it was time to build, I got this error:checking the dependency generation prefix (clang.exe -showIncludes)... configure: error: cannot de
Hi,
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 9:46 PM Kaganski Mike
wrote:
> Hi,
> So this is just to let you know in case you need an alternative JRE.
>
>
Another alternative is Red Hat OpenJDK [1] (which is probably more or less
identical to Amazon Corretto). I didn't try it however, but probably will
the next
Hi,
On 30/05/2019 14.46, Kaganski Mike wrote:
> Since Oracle JDK versions prior to 12 are now unavailable from the
> official site [1] for unregistered users (and version 12 is said to
> still have problems/needs workarounds [2]), I decided to give Amazon
> Corretto [3] a try.
As a side note,
Hi,
Since Oracle JDK versions prior to 12 are now unavailable from the
official site [1] for unregistered users (and version 12 is said to
still have problems/needs workarounds [2]), I decided to give Amazon
Corretto [3] a try. I downloaded and installed the two MSIs listed on
that page (amazo
On 16.02.2016 21:03, Paul Blinzer wrote:
> Michael, et al,
>
> thank you for the suggestion of --disable-atl. Using it let the compile
> go through.
ok... i was more suspecting that nobody had tested --disable-atl and
thus some test that actually required ATL was not disabled in that case,
but go
Michael, et al,
thank you for the suggestion of --disable-atl. Using it let the compile go
through.
Also for the good news, to root cause the ATL issue I reinstalled VS2013
community alongside VS2015 community and with that the compilation went
through just fine. So no action on your side necessar
Michael,
thanks for the pointer, I have the "community edition" installed and I have
not used that option... The build install on that machine is pretty much by
the book (or better, the web page).
I'll gather up the files and send it to you via PM (unless I can glimpse
what's going on myself in wh
On 12.02.2016 06:43, Paul Blinzer wrote:
> Compilation went well until reaching unit test for the xmltesttools (see
> below for output).
> [build CUT] sc_condformats
> C:/sources/libo-core/test/source/xmltesttools.cxx:70:SdExportTest::testBnc822341
> equality assertion failed
> - Expected: 1
> - A
Still working on getting a basic compile of LibreOffice on Windows working
(Linux version compilation goes smoothly).
Platfom: Windows 10 64bit, running Cygwin 32 LODE build setup to compile
libreoffice. Using VS2013 Community edition.
Default setup of build envrionment as outlined in
https://wiki
On 11.02.2016 06:29, Paul Blinzer wrote:
> Platfom: Windows 10 64bit, running Cygwin 32 LODE build setup to compile
> libreoffice.
> Default setup of build envrionment as outlined in
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/BuildingOnWindows
>
> Synced up to git repo today (2/10/2016)
> C
Platfom: Windows 10 64bit, running Cygwin 32 LODE build setup to compile
libreoffice.
Default setup of build envrionment as outlined in
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/BuildingOnWindows
Synced up to git repo today (2/10/2016)
Compilation went well until reaching unit test for ssl c
Christian Lohmaier googlemail.com> writes:
>
> Hi Alfreen, *,
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Afreen Bano
gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > After runnning the command "/opt/lo/bin/make" I got the below error:
> >
> > "make[1]:INTERNAL: Exiting with 1jobserver token available should be 2!
> > mak
Hi Alfreen, *,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Afreen Bano wrote:
>
> After runnning the command "/opt/lo/bin/make" I got the below error:
>
> "make[1]:INTERNAL: Exiting with 1jobserver token available should be 2!
> make:***[build] Error2"
> [...]
> Please anyone tell me what should I do to bu
Hello,
I am trying to build Libreoffice on windows7 (32bit), for this I referred to
the below link:
"https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Windows_Build_Dependencies";
I installed Visual studio 2012 along with Cygwin version 4.
After runnning the command "/opt/lo/bin/make" I got the
I was only using Matus' patch when I did the successful build.
On 2012-05-07 16:28, Matúš Kukan wrote:
On 7 May 2012 14:26, Noel Grandin wrote:
(3) You need Matus Kukan's patch to use mixed paths under cygwin (at least
until it gets committed).
I think Michael's patch [1] also helps?
Just say
On 7 May 2012 14:26, Noel Grandin wrote:
> (3) You need Matus Kukan's patch to use mixed paths under cygwin (at least
> until it gets committed).
I think Michael's patch [1] also helps?
Just saying there are also other options.
[1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2012-May/03116
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Noel Grandin wrote:
> Was 1h55 before, now approx 55min
Just for reference:
3h45m for a Windows full debug build in my computer using the VM.
--
Jesús Corrius
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop
Was 1h55 before, now approx 55min
On 2012-05-07 16:06, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
As oppose to how long before ? iow what is the gain ?
Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
h
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Noel Grandin wrote:
> On 2012-05-07 14:08, Andras Timar wrote:
>>
>> Out of interest, could you please share the know-how of building with
>> RAM-Drive under Windows 7? Thanks, Andras
>
>
> (0) I'm building under Windows7-64, using the latest Cygwin release, and the
On 2012-05-07 14:08, Andras Timar wrote:
Out of interest, could you please share the know-how of building with
RAM-Drive under Windows 7? Thanks, Andras
(0) I'm building under Windows7-64, using the latest Cygwin release, and
the Visual Studio 2008 compiler.
(1) I use the excellent free (do
We have 233000 lines of makefile code using a mix of dmake and gmake.
Good luck converting that to cmake.
On 2012-02-20 09:52, Josh Heidenreich wrote:
Hi,
Okay so it might be nuts, but has anyone tried creating a native VS
solution/projects, which ruins inside the ide? Could one be created
c
On February 17, 2012 at 11:22 AM Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > Projects like this have to
> > battle the "embrace, extend, extinguish" philosophy of commercial
interests.
>
> What makes you think only commercial entities have that philosophy? As
> far as I know Linux, also embraces and extends POSI
febbraio 2012 18:55
A: w.guerri...@ranocchilab.com
Cc: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Oggetto: Re: I: Building LibreOffice on Windows
Weird, I have a 6-core Windows machine compiling 12 things at once, no
problem.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 18:37, walter wrote:
>
> In fact, my problem is
chilab.com
> Cc: Bjoern Michaelsen; libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> Oggetto: Re: Building LibreOffice on Windows
>
>> In any case the problem remains that cl.exe is not able to use all the
>> cpu power.
>
> You said you see max 13% CPU usage by each cl.exe process on a four-cor
op.or
g] Per conto di Tor Lillqvist
Inviato: lunedì 20 febbraio 2012 16:58
A: w.guerri...@ranocchilab.com
Cc: Bjoern Michaelsen; libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Oggetto: Re: Building LibreOffice on Windows
> In any case the problem remains that cl.exe is not able to use all the
> cpu power
> Not the last time I benchmarked it (which was long before
> filter-showIncludes.pl). For the most part the slowness of forking on windows
> was related to some latency, i.e. a new process would take some time to get
> started, but it wouldnt eat cycles for that, thus making it irrelevant in a
> p
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 05:42:11PM +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> And the slowness of Cygwin's forking and executing the various Perl,
> shell and whatnot processes involved in each file being compiled (note
> the pipe to filter-showIncludes.pl) has nothing to do with it?
Not the last time I
Yes, indeed, i have taken a huge blindness !!
> In any case the problem remains that cl.exe is not able to use all the
> cpu power.
You said you see max 13% CPU usage by each cl.exe process on a four-core,
hyperthreading machine (i.e. 8-processor from Windows's point of view)?
What is 100 di
> Did you go with cmake, a cmake-style solution (something which
> converted makefiles to VS projects) or manually maintained them?
Manually maintained.
I started using cmake but it had to be discarded for some reason.
Unfortunately I don't remember why, but it was a long time ago so it
may not be
> In any case the problem remains that cl.exe is not able to use all the cpu
> power.
You said you see max 13% CPU usage by each cl.exe process on a
four-core, hyperthreading machine (i.e. 8-processor from Windows's
point of view)?
What is 100 divided by 8?
--tml
In any case the problem remains that cl.exe is not able to use all the cpu
power.
I think that this problem must be analyzed.
Best,
walter
> I have noted that on my machine the cl.exe process is unable to push a
> cpu core to the limit.
M
> I think that is oversimplifying things quite a bit.
Well, what isn't? Excuse me for writing quick emails without spending
a week researching first.
> While there are some
> stability issues with cygwin
"some" stability issues?
> when combined with evil Windows necessities like
> in-memory-vir
> I have noted that on my machine the cl.exe process is unable to push a cpu
> core to the limit.
My experience is the opposite; I occasionally see a cl.exe taking over
25% CPU on a four-core system (not HT)... Might of course just be
rounding errors; in any case for compilations taking a long tim
Hi *
About windows / Cygwin performance.
I have noted that on my machine the cl.exe process is unable to push a cpu
core to the limit.
The best that the cl.exe can is 13% cpu usage without any I/O activity.
Where is the time spent ?
Any Idea ?
I have a i7 870 @ 2.93 GHz, HT enabled.
Best,
Walter
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 02:06:37PM +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> The main problem in building LibreOffice for Windows on Windows
> currently is that the *open source* stuff used in the build, i.e.
> Cygwin, is slow and causes random errors. The Microsoft compiler and
> linker work fine. If the
Hi Jesus, Tor, *,
> It can be done, yes. But it requires several months of work from
> someone who knows what is doing and the result would probably be a
> nightmare to maintain.
Did you go with cmake, a cmake-style solution (something which
converted makefiles to VS projects) or manually maintai
> Speaking with Italo Vignoli (The Document Foundation) I understood that the
> goal was to use only open source tools so you do not have to depend in any
> way by the owners tools, such as Microsoft.
Bah. I don't agree with that.
After all, we are talking about building software to run on a
Mi
Windows
> But .. isn't there a project that involves the complete replacement
> of the MS compiler?
Yes. But that is not used *on* Windows. The subject of this thread is "Building
LibreOffice *on* Windows".
MinGW (the commonly used name for the GNU compiler and tool-
> AFAIK that was a pure community effort and not backed by Sun/Oracle.
I meant that Sun/Oracle was behind OpenOffice.org.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> OpenOffice.org, at least back when Sun/Oracle still was behind it, had
> a few (?) people working on using MinGW on Windows. We are not
> interested in that. Correspondingly they had not worked on
> cross-compilation (to any platform)
> But .. isn't there a project that involves the complete replacement of the
> MS compiler?
Yes. But that is not used *on* Windows. The subject of this thread is
"Building LibreOffice *on* Windows".
MinGW (the commonly used name for the GNU compiler and tool-chain when
But .. isn't there a project that involves the complete replacement of the
MS compiler?
Best Regards
walter
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:44:50AM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 18:22 +1030, Josh Heidenreich wrote:
> > Okay so it might be nuts, but has anyone tried creating a native VS
> > solution/projects, which ruins inside the ide? Could one be created
> > cmake style perhaps?
>
> Okay so it might be nuts, but has anyone tried creating a native VS
> solution/projects, which ruins inside the ide? Could one be created cmake
> style perhaps?
5 years ago I did that for a non trivial Open Source project (it
included gtk, python, gstreamer, etc.).
I would say it was more or les
> Okay so it might be nuts, but has anyone tried creating a native VS
> solution/projects, which ruins inside the ide?
In theory it should be fairly trivial to create a "native" (whatever
that means) VS solution that just runs the same Cygwin make that you
would start manually otherwise.
But I gu
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 18:22 +1030, Josh Heidenreich wrote:
> Okay so it might be nuts, but has anyone tried creating a native VS
> solution/projects, which ruins inside the ide? Could one be created
> cmake style perhaps?
Ruins ? :-) I suspect that, unless this can be compiled from the
gn
Hi,
Okay so it might be nuts, but has anyone tried creating a native VS
solution/projects, which ruins inside the ide? Could one be created cmake
style perhaps?
Josh
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:14:28AM -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > If at all possible, rather run Ubuntu (or some other Linux distro)
> > inside a VMWare virtual machine on your Windows desktop.
>
> Don't forget openSUSE and Fedora. We have quite a number of core
> developers from both of th
>> > Projects like this have to battle the "embrace, extend, extinguish"
>> > philosophy of commercial
>> > interests.
>> What makes you think only commercial entities have that philosophy?
> What makes you think I thought that?
I misunderstood your use of "battle". I thought you meant that onl
> Projects like this have to
> battle the "embrace, extend, extinguish" philosophy of commercial interests.
What makes you think only commercial entities have that philosophy? As
far as I know Linux, also embraces and extends POSIX, for instance,
and has more or less managed to extinguish quite ma
On February 16, 2012 at 11:23 AM "Jesús Corrius"
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> > If at all possible, rather run Ubuntu (or some other Linux distro)
inside a
> > VMWare virtual machine on your Windows desktop.
>
> We should encourage Windows developers to join the project to have a
> better Windows ver
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 17:19 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
> well, nobody builds on Windows. because the Windows build is very often
> broken. which is because nobody builds on Windows.
I build it on occasion, a master from a day or two ago built fine with
express 2008
C.
Hi Gareth,
Tor Lillqvist píše v Čt 16. 02. 2012 v 17:13 +0200:
> This is a short summary, and I might be missing something. For more
> detail, there should be stuff in the wiki. Don't hesitate to ask more
> on this list! And as you read the wiki, please fix inconsistencies you
> notice, that is w
Hi Walter,
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 18:50 +0100, walter wrote:
> A few weeks ago I spoke by telephone with Italo Vignoli (The Document
> Foundation) explaining my needs and the work that I hope to do.
Sure, but unless you clearly explain your needs, it's hard for everyone
else to know what y
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 20:34 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > That would be great but I don't think it would be very legal to distribute
> > it :)
>
> Not to the general public, but surely to specfic customers that can
> prove they have the required licenses themselves already? But IANAL...
> That would be great but I don't think it would be very legal to distribute it
> :)
Not to the general public, but surely to specfic customers that can
prove they have the required licenses themselves already? But IANAL...
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailin
A few weeks ago I spoke by telephone with Italo Vignoli (The Document
Foundation) explaining my needs and the work that I hope to do.
Regards
walter
___
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 18:24 +0100, walter
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 18:24 +0100, walter wrote:
> My only problem is knowing whether to invest my time in 'cygwin' or Linux.
> I need to build a customized version, and the new code will be returned to
> the community
It depends what you want to achieve. If you want to get a bug fixed
th
>In other words, you are doing this commercially, as part of your job, for
business purposes?
[walter] YES
>So you are instead demanding that the "community" (which consists of
volunteers spending their own personal resources, and paid developers
working for >companies that might even be your co
Hi Tor,
>
> Or you could contract out the effort of setting up a working build
> environment on a machine... For instance provide a Windows virtual
> machine image with everything set up.
That would be great but I don't think it would be very legal to distribute it :)
--
Jesús Corrius
> I am a windows developer and I need to integrate LibreOffice in our windows
> business application.
In other words, you are doing this commercially, as part of your job,
for business purposes?
> I would have a hard time switching to develop using Linux.
We don't have any immediate plans to dro
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 18:02 +0100, walter wrote:
> It would be interesting that a core developer uses Cygwin :)
I do when I'm on Windows. It's not like we have any other choices
anyway.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
___
LibreOffic
> It would be interesting that a core developer uses Cygwin :)
The build on Windows using cygwin is more complicated than on Linux.
But once you have the beast built, the development should be exactly the same.
--
Jesús Corrius
___
LibreOffice mailing
It would be interesting that a core developer uses Cygwin :)
> But the real problem is that if the community does not want or can not
> support then development on the windows platform is good for me to say
> this very clearly.
> I can not go and play around and waste time in this way.
What d
> But the real problem is that if the community does not want or can not
> support then development on the windows platform is good for me to say this
> very clearly.
> I can not go and play around and waste time in this way.
What do you mean by supported?
--
Jesús Corrius
_
I am a windows developer and I need to integrate LibreOffice in our windows
business application.
I would have a hard time switching to develop using Linux.
But the real problem is that if the community does not want or can not
support then development on the windows platform is good for me to say
Hi guys,
> If at all possible, rather run Ubuntu (or some other Linux distro) inside a
> VMWare virtual machine on your Windows desktop.
We should encourage Windows developers to join the project to have a
better Windows version.
Telling them to use Linux will not improve the situation.
--
Jesú
On 16/02/12 16:17, Noel Grandin wrote:
> Hi
>
> If at all possible, rather run Ubuntu (or some other Linux distro)
> inside a VMWare virtual machine on your Windows desktop.
>
> It's much easier, speaking as someone who does just that, after spending
> too long fighting with building under Window
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 17:17 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
> Hi
>
> If at all possible, rather run Ubuntu (or some other Linux distro)
> inside a VMWare virtual machine on your Windows desktop.
Don't forget openSUSE and Fedora. We have quite a number of core
developers from both of these distros, so
In the long run the best choice is definitely to abandon cygwin and develop
using Linux.
I used cygwin for a little while and I've seen that is not well supported L
Which version of Linux is better to use?
There are big differences between using Ubuntu and CentOS?
Regards,
walter
Hi
If at all possible, rather run Ubuntu (or some other Linux distro)
inside a VMWare virtual machine on your Windows desktop.
It's much easier, speaking as someone who does just that, after spending
too long fighting with building under Windows.
Regards, Noel.
On 2012-02-16 16:54, Gareth
> New to open source and attracted to LibreOffice and I want to start
> contributing.
Great! Welcome!
> But how does the whole build process work on Windows?
This is a short summary, and I might be missing something. For more
detail, there should be stuff in the wiki. Don't hesitate to ask more
Hi,
New to open source and attracted to LibreOffice and I want to start
contributing.
But how does the whole build process work on Windows?
Gareth
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listin
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 10:11 +0100, Stuart Ledwich (Hotmail) wrote:
> ... -IH:/src/libre/bootstrap ...
> c1 : fatal error C1083: Cannot open source file: 'pango-enum-types.c': No
> such file or directory
You know, I think this is the same problem I had recently, which seemed
to be triggered by bui
I am attempting to build libre in debug mode on windows and after quite
some time I have hit the following problem:
cl -MDd -W3 -nologo -I. -I.. -I.
-IH:/src/libre/bootstrap/solver/350/wntmsci12.pro/inc/stl
-IH:/src/libre/bootstrap/solver/350/wntmsci12.pro/inc/external
-IH:/src/libre/
76 matches
Mail list logo
