On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 01:51:11PM +0100, Joren DC
> wrote:
>> What about lbz, which is a combination of our 2 top-votes (lo and lobz)?
>> lbz was also one of the choises, but it looks like a golden midway
>> between the top votes :)?
>
> I
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 01:51:11PM +0100, Joren DC
wrote:
> > Here are the final tallies from the voting:
> > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/December_16#PENDING_ITEM:_Bugzilla_Migration_etc.
> >
> > blo (1)
> > libo (2)
> > lbz (3)
> > lob (3)
> > lo (6)
> > lobz (7)
>
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Joren DC wrote:
> Robinson Tryon schreef op 17/12/13 13:41:
>> lo (6)
>> lobz (7)
>>
>> Separated by just a single vote, lo and lobz are (unsurprisingly) the
>> favorites :-)
> What about lbz, which is a combination of our 2 top-votes (lo and lobz)?
> lbz was also
Robinson Tryon schreef op 17/12/13 13:41:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Here are the final tallies from the voting:
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/December_16#PENDING_ITEM:_Bugzilla_Migration_etc.
>
> blo (1)
> libo (2)
> lbz (3)
> lob (3)
> lo (6)
> lobz (7)
>
> -
>
> Separated by
Hi everyone,
Here are the final tallies from the voting:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/December_16#PENDING_ITEM:_Bugzilla_Migration_etc.
blo (1)
libo (2)
lbz (3)
lob (3)
lo (6)
lobz (7)
-
Separated by just a single vote, lo and lobz are (unsurprisingly) the
favorites
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Robinson Tryon
wrote:
> Up at the top of your email you said:
> "I'm sorry I apparently started a bikeshed on this..."
>
> ...but the length and breadth of your email belies that
> characterization of this particular decision about abbreviations. This
> is clearly n
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Robinson Tryon
> wrote:
>> I felt like I was working hard to go through appropriate channels...
>
> Yeah, you did well. I'm sorry I apparently started a bikeshed on this...
> I have missed ESC of nov 21st (m
Le Fri, 06 Dec 2013 22:31:53 +0100, Robinson Tryon
a écrit:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Mat M wrote:
You should have cross-posted the vote announcement on all concerned
lists,
then you'd been more votes.
What are the 'concerned lists'? i10n? projects? website? Lots of
people intera
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Robinson Tryon
wrote:
> I felt like I was working hard to go through appropriate channels.
> Perhaps if I'd spent more time I could've gotten more input from other
> groups, but at this point I feel like I've already spent a ton of time
> on just this one little pie
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Mat M wrote:
> You should have cross-posted the vote announcement on all concerned lists,
> then you'd been more votes.
What are the 'concerned lists'? i10n? projects? website? Lots of
people interact with the bugtracker, chief among them, the QA team.
For me, th
Hello Robinson, *
Le Fri, 06 Dec 2013 07:54:07 +0100, Robinson Tryon
a écrit:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud
wrote:
but by a wide margin the only 4-char abbreviation in the
list has taken an early lead.
Sure, but if you were to ask that question on the dev-ml rather tha
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Robinson Tryon
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>> sure but the dev need to use the canonical abbreviation because we
>> have bot that use them to detect association between commit and bugs
>> that is not the case on Ask for instance
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> sure but the dev need to use the canonical abbreviation because we
> have bot that use them to detect association between commit and bugs
> that is not the case on Ask for instance
technically speaking, the bot could recognize lo# as well
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Robinson Tryon
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>>>
>>> The devs really like lo# (as it gives them more room in commit
>>> messages),
>>
>> Yeah, and it is the dev that have to type it a lot, no ?
>
> Sure -- and people on the Ask
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>>
>> The devs really like lo# (as it gives them more room in commit
>> messages),
>
> Yeah, and it is the dev that have to type it a lot, no ?
Sure -- and people on the Ask site, and QA people in FDO...err
, etc..
>>but by a wide marg
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Robinson Tryon
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Eike Rathke wrote:
>>
>>> > * lo
>> 1st rank. YES!
>>...
>>> > * lobz
>> No, too long. Lobster, anyone?
>>
>> From my view of a developer who has to type and squeeze these into the
>> alreay short enough commi
16 matches
Mail list logo
