On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Robinson Tryon <bishop.robin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Eike Rathke <er...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> > * lo >> 1st rank. YES! >>... >>> > * lobz >> No, too long. Lobster, anyone? >> >> From my view of a developer who has to type and squeeze these into the >> alreay short enough commit summary line. > > Hi all -- thank you for voting! For those of you who haven't yet > voted...do it! We'll close the voting process at the next QA call. > > Here's a quick summary of how the votes have been cast so far: > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/LibreOffice_Bugzilla_Proposal#We.27re_now_voting.21.21.21 > > The devs really like lo# (as it gives them more room in commit > messages),
Yeah, and it is the dev that have to type it a lot, no ? >but by a wide margin the only 4-char abbreviation in the > list has taken an early lead. Sure, but if you were to ask that question on the dev-ml rather than here.. I'd bet you you'd get many more vote for lo# Norbert PS: btw I don't see the appeal to want to stick characters in there to re-inforce the idea that it is a bugzilla number... the # in it is sufficient enough to make that clear so the b/bz stuff is not only a waste of space.. but also completely redundant. it is like climbing up or descending down... _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
